13-Oct-2024 19:28 GMT.		 UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[News] OS 4 coverage on OS newsANN.lu
Posted on 15-Jul-2002 06:57 GMT by SimplePPC116 comments
View flat
View list
Mike Bouma did an excellent write-up on OS 4 for OS news. Includes 5 unreleased screenshots. The article can be found here.
List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1Leki15-Jul-2002 05:09 GMT
Comment 2NihilVor15-Jul-2002 05:23 GMT
Comment 3Ben Hermans/Hyperion15-Jul-2002 05:27 GMT
Comment 4Anonymous15-Jul-2002 05:55 GMT
Comment 5Rik Sweeney15-Jul-2002 06:39 GMT
Comment 6Bifford the Youngest15-Jul-2002 06:50 GMT
Comment 7Bifford15-Jul-2002 06:52 GMT
Comment 8Rik Sweeney15-Jul-2002 07:12 GMT
Comment 9Anders Kjeldsen15-Jul-2002 07:14 GMT
Comment 10Don Cox15-Jul-2002 07:18 GMT
Comment 11Peter Erixon15-Jul-2002 07:20 GMT
Comment 12Budda15-Jul-2002 07:34 GMT
Comment 13Joe "Floid" Kanowitz15-Jul-2002 07:37 GMT
Comment 14Anders Kjeldsen15-Jul-2002 07:41 GMT
Comment 15James Carroll15-Jul-2002 07:46 GMT
Comment 16Mike Bouma15-Jul-2002 07:48 GMT
Comment 17Treke15-Jul-2002 07:52 GMT
Comment 18Don Cox15-Jul-2002 08:14 GMT
Comment 19Mika Hanhijärvi15-Jul-2002 08:18 GMT
Comment 20Lando / Trinity15-Jul-2002 08:30 GMT
Comment 21Don Cox15-Jul-2002 08:31 GMT
Comment 22Chris Young15-Jul-2002 08:48 GMT
Comment 23Gavin15-Jul-2002 08:59 GMT
Comment 24Per Lindén15-Jul-2002 09:17 GMT
Comment 25Solar15-Jul-2002 09:31 GMT
Comment 26Janne Sirén15-Jul-2002 09:48 GMT
Comment 27Leif15-Jul-2002 10:01 GMT
Comment 28Ben Hermans/Hyperion15-Jul-2002 10:04 GMT
Comment 29cOrpse15-Jul-2002 10:14 GMT
Comment 30Don Cox15-Jul-2002 10:16 GMT
Comment 31Don Cox15-Jul-2002 10:18 GMT
Comment 32Per Lindén15-Jul-2002 10:25 GMT
Comment 33Peter Gordon15-Jul-2002 10:26 GMT
Comment 34Viktor Schöneberg15-Jul-2002 10:29 GMT
Comment 35Hi15-Jul-2002 10:38 GMT
Comment 36Don Cox15-Jul-2002 10:51 GMT
Comment 37Viktor Schöneberg15-Jul-2002 10:52 GMT
Comment 38Mika Hanhijärvi15-Jul-2002 10:58 GMT
Comment 39Mika Hanhijärvi15-Jul-2002 10:59 GMT
Comment 40Viktor Schöneberg15-Jul-2002 11:01 GMT
Comment 41Mika Hanhijärvi15-Jul-2002 11:05 GMT
Comment 42Chris Y15-Jul-2002 11:05 GMT
Comment 43AmiTroll15-Jul-2002 11:16 GMT
Comment 44Mika Hanhijärvi15-Jul-2002 11:22 GMT
Comment 45AmiTroll15-Jul-2002 11:27 GMT
Comment 46Peter Gordon15-Jul-2002 11:29 GMT
Comment 47amigammc15-Jul-2002 11:39 GMT
Comment 48amigammc15-Jul-2002 11:40 GMT
Comment 49Fabio Alemagna15-Jul-2002 11:43 GMT
Comment 50kjetil15-Jul-2002 11:51 GMT
Comment 51X15-Jul-2002 11:57 GMT
Comment 52AmiTroll15-Jul-2002 12:12 GMT
Comment 53Chris Y15-Jul-2002 12:28 GMT
Comment 54Chris Y15-Jul-2002 12:30 GMT
Comment 55catohagen15-Jul-2002 12:32 GMT
Comment 56Peter Gordon15-Jul-2002 12:53 GMT
Comment 57ehaines15-Jul-2002 13:17 GMT
Comment 58anonymous15-Jul-2002 13:49 GMT
Comment 59Troels E15-Jul-2002 14:15 GMT
Comment 60joe15-Jul-2002 14:41 GMT
Comment 61Adam Kowalczyk15-Jul-2002 15:19 GMT
Comment 62Solar15-Jul-2002 16:39 GMT
Comment 63anonymous15-Jul-2002 17:15 GMT
Comment 64z515-Jul-2002 17:49 GMT
Comment 65Adam Kowalczyk15-Jul-2002 17:56 GMT
Comment 66Chris Y15-Jul-2002 18:30 GMT
Comment 67Frans15-Jul-2002 18:36 GMT
Comment 68ShadesOfGrey15-Jul-2002 19:00 GMT
Comment 69catohagen15-Jul-2002 19:22 GMT
Comment 70Adam Kowalczyk15-Jul-2002 19:27 GMT
Comment 71catohagen15-Jul-2002 19:44 GMT
Comment 72Lando / Trinity15-Jul-2002 19:51 GMT
Comment 73Farker15-Jul-2002 20:03 GMT
Comment 74anonymous15-Jul-2002 20:28 GMT
Comment 75Adam Kowalczyk15-Jul-2002 21:08 GMT
Comment 76Ed Dana15-Jul-2002 23:26 GMT
Comment 77amigammc15-Jul-2002 23:39 GMT
Comment 78amigammc15-Jul-2002 23:48 GMT
Comment 79Joe "Floid" Kanowitz15-Jul-2002 23:52 GMT
Comment 80Solar16-Jul-2002 06:17 GMT
Comment 81Don Cox16-Jul-2002 06:34 GMT
Comment 82Johan Grip16-Jul-2002 06:50 GMT
Comment 83Solar16-Jul-2002 07:59 GMT
Comment 84Joe "Floid" Kanowitz16-Jul-2002 08:04 GMT
Comment 85Chris Y16-Jul-2002 08:52 GMT
Comment 863seas16-Jul-2002 10:56 GMT
Comment 87Rik Sweeney16-Jul-2002 11:23 GMT
Comment 88Adam Kowalczyk16-Jul-2002 11:37 GMT
Comment 89anonymous16-Jul-2002 13:28 GMT
Comment 90anonymous16-Jul-2002 13:36 GMT
Comment 91Chris Y16-Jul-2002 13:50 GMT
Comment 92Tonny16-Jul-2002 14:14 GMT
Comment 93Rik Sweeney16-Jul-2002 14:15 GMT
Comment 94Don Cox16-Jul-2002 14:15 GMT
Comment 95Adam Kowalczyk16-Jul-2002 15:17 GMT
Comment 963seas16-Jul-2002 16:45 GMT
Comment 97Rik Sweeney16-Jul-2002 16:47 GMT
Comment 98Chris Y16-Jul-2002 17:29 GMT
Comment 99Adam Kowalczyk16-Jul-2002 17:41 GMT
Comment 100Alan Croft16-Jul-2002 18:05 GMT
Comment 101strobe16-Jul-2002 19:15 GMT
Comment 102Anonymous16-Jul-2002 19:44 GMT
Comment 103Adam Kowalczyk16-Jul-2002 21:00 GMT
Comment 104anonymous16-Jul-2002 21:27 GMT
Comment 105Hammer (Same person from Amiga.org)16-Jul-2002 21:32 GMT
Comment 1063seas16-Jul-2002 21:45 GMT
Comment 1073seas16-Jul-2002 22:00 GMT
Comment 108Adam Kowalczyk16-Jul-2002 22:11 GMT
Comment 1093seas16-Jul-2002 23:15 GMT
Comment 110Marcus Sundman17-Jul-2002 06:01 GMT
Comment 111Andreas Wolf17-Jul-2002 09:29 GMT
Comment 112Andreas Wolf17-Jul-2002 09:32 GMT
OS 4 coverage on OS news : Comment 113 of 116ANN.lu
Posted by Anonymous on 17-Jul-2002 09:46 GMT
In reply to Comment 103 (Adam Kowalczyk):
"I think Linux can benefit from running on a VP system."
Why would I want Linux to run more slowly ? I don't understand. You're going to have to explain slowly and clearly why making all my software slower AND paying a license fee to Tao would be a "benefit". Every piece of Linux software that's released runs fine on my PC. 99% of the same software runs on Ole's PPC Linux system, including EVERYTHING in the modern Red Hat or Debian distributions.
[ Do you also think people should own cars that are 10% more expensive and 10% slower but have a reversable steering column so that they can be safely driven in countries with contrary road laws ? ]
It's also important to realise that Tao's "binary portability" does not apply in temporal terms. That is, software from one version of AmigaDE (say the "Fruity Loops special developer edition, Dec 2001") won't necessarily work with a different version (say the "Double Intent pre-non-release, June 2002") and so from the POV of an end user, AmigaDE is actually worse than the supposedly "non portable" system they have now.
Jump...
#115 Don Cox
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 1143seas17-Jul-2002 11:48 GMT
Comment 115Don Cox17-Jul-2002 12:12 GMT
Comment 116Solar18-Jul-2002 03:00 GMT
Back to Top