18-Sep-2024 08:52 GMT.		 UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[News] OS 4 coverage on OS newsANN.lu
Posted on 15-Jul-2002 06:57 GMT by SimplePPC116 comments
View flat
View list
Mike Bouma did an excellent write-up on OS 4 for OS news. Includes 5 unreleased screenshots. The article can be found here.
List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1Leki15-Jul-2002 05:09 GMT
Comment 2NihilVor15-Jul-2002 05:23 GMT
Comment 3Ben Hermans/Hyperion15-Jul-2002 05:27 GMT
Comment 4Anonymous15-Jul-2002 05:55 GMT
Comment 5Rik Sweeney15-Jul-2002 06:39 GMT
Comment 6Bifford the Youngest15-Jul-2002 06:50 GMT
Comment 7Bifford15-Jul-2002 06:52 GMT
Comment 8Rik Sweeney15-Jul-2002 07:12 GMT
Comment 9Anders Kjeldsen15-Jul-2002 07:14 GMT
Comment 10Don Cox15-Jul-2002 07:18 GMT
Comment 11Peter Erixon15-Jul-2002 07:20 GMT
Comment 12Budda15-Jul-2002 07:34 GMT
Comment 13Joe "Floid" Kanowitz15-Jul-2002 07:37 GMT
Comment 14Anders Kjeldsen15-Jul-2002 07:41 GMT
Comment 15James Carroll15-Jul-2002 07:46 GMT
Comment 16Mike Bouma15-Jul-2002 07:48 GMT
Comment 17Treke15-Jul-2002 07:52 GMT
Comment 18Don Cox15-Jul-2002 08:14 GMT
Comment 19Mika Hanhijärvi15-Jul-2002 08:18 GMT
Comment 20Lando / Trinity15-Jul-2002 08:30 GMT
Comment 21Don Cox15-Jul-2002 08:31 GMT
Comment 22Chris Young15-Jul-2002 08:48 GMT
Comment 23Gavin15-Jul-2002 08:59 GMT
Comment 24Per Lindén15-Jul-2002 09:17 GMT
Comment 25Solar15-Jul-2002 09:31 GMT
OS 4 coverage on OS news : Comment 26 of 116ANN.lu
Posted by Janne Sirén on 15-Jul-2002 09:48 GMT
In reply to Comment 25 (Solar):
>AmigaOS *4* will have memory protection. AmigaOS *3.x* applications will not
>benefit from that, since they will be run in a OS 3.x "sandbox". In a sense,
>your OS 4 applications will be protected from the OS 3.x sandbox and vice
>versa, but an OS 3.x app running amok will still be able to kill everything
>in the sandbox. (AFAIK, as always.)
That is how one would hope it works. However, I have not read anywhere that it actually does that. I don't remember the details how they were laid out, but I don't recall talk of a sandbox for OS 3.x applications in OS 4? It was more on the lines that you can turn it on and off, and it will break some applications if on - and misuse of MEMF_PUBLIC may distort something as well? It would be cool, though, if it does have a sandbox.
Jump...
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 27Leif15-Jul-2002 10:01 GMT
Comment 28Ben Hermans/Hyperion15-Jul-2002 10:04 GMT
Comment 29cOrpse15-Jul-2002 10:14 GMT
Comment 30Don Cox15-Jul-2002 10:16 GMT
Comment 31Don Cox15-Jul-2002 10:18 GMT
Comment 32Per Lindén15-Jul-2002 10:25 GMT
Comment 33Peter Gordon15-Jul-2002 10:26 GMT
Comment 34Viktor Schöneberg15-Jul-2002 10:29 GMT
Comment 35Hi15-Jul-2002 10:38 GMT
Comment 36Don Cox15-Jul-2002 10:51 GMT
Comment 37Viktor Schöneberg15-Jul-2002 10:52 GMT
Comment 38Mika Hanhijärvi15-Jul-2002 10:58 GMT
Comment 39Mika Hanhijärvi15-Jul-2002 10:59 GMT
Comment 40Viktor Schöneberg15-Jul-2002 11:01 GMT
Comment 41Mika Hanhijärvi15-Jul-2002 11:05 GMT
Comment 42Chris Y15-Jul-2002 11:05 GMT
Comment 43AmiTroll15-Jul-2002 11:16 GMT
Comment 44Mika Hanhijärvi15-Jul-2002 11:22 GMT
Comment 45AmiTroll15-Jul-2002 11:27 GMT
Comment 46Peter Gordon15-Jul-2002 11:29 GMT
Comment 47amigammc15-Jul-2002 11:39 GMT
Comment 48amigammc15-Jul-2002 11:40 GMT
Comment 49Fabio Alemagna15-Jul-2002 11:43 GMT
Comment 50kjetil15-Jul-2002 11:51 GMT
Comment 51X15-Jul-2002 11:57 GMT
Comment 52AmiTroll15-Jul-2002 12:12 GMT
Comment 53Chris Y15-Jul-2002 12:28 GMT
Comment 54Chris Y15-Jul-2002 12:30 GMT
Comment 55catohagen15-Jul-2002 12:32 GMT
Comment 56Peter Gordon15-Jul-2002 12:53 GMT
Comment 57ehaines15-Jul-2002 13:17 GMT
Comment 58anonymous15-Jul-2002 13:49 GMT
Comment 59Troels E15-Jul-2002 14:15 GMT
Comment 60joe15-Jul-2002 14:41 GMT
Comment 61Adam Kowalczyk15-Jul-2002 15:19 GMT
Comment 62Solar15-Jul-2002 16:39 GMT
Comment 63anonymous15-Jul-2002 17:15 GMT
Comment 64z515-Jul-2002 17:49 GMT
Comment 65Adam Kowalczyk15-Jul-2002 17:56 GMT
Comment 66Chris Y15-Jul-2002 18:30 GMT
Comment 67Frans15-Jul-2002 18:36 GMT
Comment 68ShadesOfGrey15-Jul-2002 19:00 GMT
Comment 69catohagen15-Jul-2002 19:22 GMT
Comment 70Adam Kowalczyk15-Jul-2002 19:27 GMT
Comment 71catohagen15-Jul-2002 19:44 GMT
Comment 72Lando / Trinity15-Jul-2002 19:51 GMT
Comment 73Farker15-Jul-2002 20:03 GMT
Comment 74anonymous15-Jul-2002 20:28 GMT
Comment 75Adam Kowalczyk15-Jul-2002 21:08 GMT
Comment 76Ed Dana15-Jul-2002 23:26 GMT
Comment 77amigammc15-Jul-2002 23:39 GMT
Comment 78amigammc15-Jul-2002 23:48 GMT
Comment 79Joe "Floid" Kanowitz15-Jul-2002 23:52 GMT
Comment 80Solar16-Jul-2002 06:17 GMT
Comment 81Don Cox16-Jul-2002 06:34 GMT
Comment 82Johan Grip16-Jul-2002 06:50 GMT
Comment 83Solar16-Jul-2002 07:59 GMT
Comment 84Joe "Floid" Kanowitz16-Jul-2002 08:04 GMT
Comment 85Chris Y16-Jul-2002 08:52 GMT
Comment 863seas16-Jul-2002 10:56 GMT
Comment 87Rik Sweeney16-Jul-2002 11:23 GMT
Comment 88Adam Kowalczyk16-Jul-2002 11:37 GMT
Comment 89anonymous16-Jul-2002 13:28 GMT
Comment 90anonymous16-Jul-2002 13:36 GMT
Comment 91Chris Y16-Jul-2002 13:50 GMT
Comment 92Tonny16-Jul-2002 14:14 GMT
Comment 93Rik Sweeney16-Jul-2002 14:15 GMT
Comment 94Don Cox16-Jul-2002 14:15 GMT
Comment 95Adam Kowalczyk16-Jul-2002 15:17 GMT
Comment 963seas16-Jul-2002 16:45 GMT
Comment 97Rik Sweeney16-Jul-2002 16:47 GMT
Comment 98Chris Y16-Jul-2002 17:29 GMT
Comment 99Adam Kowalczyk16-Jul-2002 17:41 GMT
Comment 100Alan Croft16-Jul-2002 18:05 GMT
Comment 101strobe16-Jul-2002 19:15 GMT
Comment 102Anonymous16-Jul-2002 19:44 GMT
Comment 103Adam Kowalczyk16-Jul-2002 21:00 GMT
Comment 104anonymous16-Jul-2002 21:27 GMT
Comment 105Hammer (Same person from Amiga.org)16-Jul-2002 21:32 GMT
Comment 1063seas16-Jul-2002 21:45 GMT
Comment 1073seas16-Jul-2002 22:00 GMT
Comment 108Adam Kowalczyk16-Jul-2002 22:11 GMT
Comment 1093seas16-Jul-2002 23:15 GMT
Comment 110Marcus Sundman17-Jul-2002 06:01 GMT
Comment 111Andreas Wolf17-Jul-2002 09:29 GMT
Comment 112Andreas Wolf17-Jul-2002 09:32 GMT
Comment 113Anonymous17-Jul-2002 09:46 GMT
Comment 1143seas17-Jul-2002 11:48 GMT
Comment 115Don Cox17-Jul-2002 12:12 GMT
Comment 116Solar18-Jul-2002 03:00 GMT
Back to Top