24-Apr-2024 11:15 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[Rant] Microsoft to Exit Mac Market If Sales Continue to LagANN.lu
Posted on 16-Jul-2002 23:29 GMT by Paul Smith71 comments
View flat
View list
If a serious software publisher plans to leave a platform with a huge userbase (surely we're talking in the hundreds of thousands for MacOSX?), then what chance does OS4 have of making it with promotion figures of about 600? (for forum)

Link to OSNews.com article If nothing else, this proves what what many have been saying for the past 12 months (and openly ridiculed for). The days of binding your software to custom hardware are over.

Surely it is time that the people in charge of AmigaOS acknowledged that the non-mainsteam hardware route was a mistake. I'd bet that a similar promotion scheme for a version of AmigaOS that ran on the majority of the world's computers would have brought a much larger, and possibly commercially viable userbase. I'd also wager that the numbers sold would have been so, that it would have brought more revenue than the current scheme of selling hardware with it.

This is not intended as flamebait. I hope to provoke a discussion on the future of AmigaOS, rather than a flame-fest.

List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1Mike Veroukis16-Jul-2002 21:46 GMT
Comment 2Darrin16-Jul-2002 21:55 GMT
Comment 3Joe "Floid" Kanowitz16-Jul-2002 22:12 GMT
Comment 4gary_c16-Jul-2002 23:35 GMT
Comment 5the man in the shadows17-Jul-2002 02:00 GMT
Comment 6Frans17-Jul-2002 06:01 GMT
Comment 7koan17-Jul-2002 06:15 GMT
Comment 8Mika Hanhijärvi17-Jul-2002 06:43 GMT
Comment 9Mika Hanhijärvi17-Jul-2002 06:51 GMT
Comment 10Iggy Drougge17-Jul-2002 07:06 GMT
Comment 11José17-Jul-2002 07:08 GMT
Comment 12Lando / Trinity17-Jul-2002 07:31 GMT
Comment 13kjetil17-Jul-2002 07:54 GMT
Comment 14Anonymous17-Jul-2002 08:00 GMT
Comment 15reflect17-Jul-2002 08:05 GMT
Comment 16John Chandler17-Jul-2002 09:16 GMT
Comment 17redrumloa17-Jul-2002 09:16 GMT
Comment 18Anonymous17-Jul-2002 09:22 GMT
Comment 19Sam Dunham17-Jul-2002 09:45 GMT
Comment 20Hammer17-Jul-2002 09:48 GMT
Comment 21Anonymous17-Jul-2002 09:58 GMT
Comment 22Jack Perry17-Jul-2002 09:58 GMT
Comment 23reflect17-Jul-2002 10:38 GMT
Comment 24Anonymous17-Jul-2002 11:12 GMT
Comment 25reflect17-Jul-2002 11:19 GMT
Comment 26sutro17-Jul-2002 11:42 GMT
Comment 27Roj17-Jul-2002 11:47 GMT
Comment 28Fabian Jimenez17-Jul-2002 11:47 GMT
Comment 29Don Cox17-Jul-2002 12:08 GMT
Comment 30Anonymous17-Jul-2002 12:34 GMT
Comment 31Lee O'Malley17-Jul-2002 13:21 GMT
Comment 32Darrin17-Jul-2002 13:27 GMT
Comment 33Darrin17-Jul-2002 13:34 GMT
Comment 34dammy17-Jul-2002 13:51 GMT
Comment 35TimeWillTell17-Jul-2002 14:17 GMT
Comment 36Don Cox17-Jul-2002 14:20 GMT
Comment 37Anonymous17-Jul-2002 14:27 GMT
Comment 38Amigasteve17-Jul-2002 14:46 GMT
Comment 39acg17-Jul-2002 15:00 GMT
Comment 40Kelly Samel17-Jul-2002 15:39 GMT
Comment 41strobe17-Jul-2002 15:47 GMT
Comment 42anonymous17-Jul-2002 16:25 GMT
Comment 43Coolio17-Jul-2002 16:56 GMT
Comment 44Coolio17-Jul-2002 17:05 GMT
Comment 45Rafo17-Jul-2002 17:59 GMT
Comment 46Anonymous17-Jul-2002 18:06 GMT
Comment 47Jaybee17-Jul-2002 19:41 GMT
Comment 48smithy17-Jul-2002 19:59 GMT
Comment 49Ruben Monteiro17-Jul-2002 21:38 GMT
Comment 50gary_c17-Jul-2002 23:09 GMT
Comment 51Hammer (same person as in Amiga.org)17-Jul-2002 23:39 GMT
Comment 52Hammer18-Jul-2002 00:04 GMT
Comment 53Lee O'Malley18-Jul-2002 00:10 GMT
Comment 54Anonymous18-Jul-2002 09:19 GMT
Comment 55acg18-Jul-2002 13:23 GMT
Microsoft to Exit Mac Market If Sales Continue to Lag : Comment 56 of 71ANN.lu
Posted by Coolio on 18-Jul-2002 13:32 GMT
No sooner had I mentioned that linux (and indeed, most *nix distros) are vastly less stable when X is loaded up, I should have been prepared for the screaming hoards trotting out with "Oh, mine doesn't crash!" "Mine has been running for YEARS without crashing!" I'm just waiting for the usual refrain, "If your uptime isn't at least equal to my uptime, then it means YOU'RE DOING SOMETHING WRONG! IT'S NOT MY BELOVED LINUX!" Well hey, sh*t heads, I haven't rebooted Windows 98 in 9 months, and I do casual web browsing and stare at pr0n on it as well! OH MY GOD, THAT THEREFORE PROVES THAT WINDOWS 98 IS STABLE! TROT TROT TROT! TROT TROT TROT! My friend has a Quad XEON PC running WINDOWS 2000 and it hasn't needed a reboot in YEARS! TROT TROT TROT!
Xwindows is vastly unstable, it has slow refreshes, and there STILL isn't a dominant window manager for it. Every hangup I've seen on a linux box is in X. So, now that you people have trotted out your personal jesus testimonials about the VAST STABILITY Of *nix boxes running X is, I hate to say it, but just because YOU haven't had it crash doesn't invalidate MY, or anyone else's experience! Go do a search for xwindows unstable in google. Now try a search for xwindows crash. TROT TROT TROT!
My point in all this? Well, besides that people who use *nix have inflated senses of self worth, is that it DOESN'T MATTER. Until MorphOS gets a proper toehold in the Amiga market, NOTHING MATTERS. It's like buzzards fighting over rotting meat! IT JUST DOESN'T MATTER! SING IT WITH ME!
Jump...
#57 Anonymous #66 Seehund
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 57Anonymous18-Jul-2002 14:33 GMT
Comment 58Coolio18-Jul-2002 15:04 GMT
Comment 59amigammc18-Jul-2002 15:06 GMT
Comment 60mike huel18-Jul-2002 19:02 GMT
Comment 61anonymous18-Jul-2002 19:10 GMT
Comment 62amigammc19-Jul-2002 00:39 GMT
Comment 63amigammc19-Jul-2002 00:42 GMT
Comment 64NeRP19-Jul-2002 01:04 GMT
Comment 65Anonymous19-Jul-2002 06:55 GMT
Comment 66Seehund19-Jul-2002 07:47 GMT
Comment 67NoctReX19-Jul-2002 10:18 GMT
Comment 68NoctReX19-Jul-2002 10:37 GMT
Comment 69Jim Forbes-Ritte (AGAfaster)19-Jul-2002 11:59 GMT
Comment 70Coolio19-Jul-2002 15:35 GMT
Comment 71Brad Ray20-Jul-2002 16:13 GMT
Back to Top