19-Apr-2024 01:25 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[News] Thendic France comment on OS4.0ANN.lu
Posted on 17-Aug-2002 19:55 GMT by cheesegrate165 comments
View flat
View list
On an ANN thread Bill and Raquel comment on their attitude towareds AmigaOS4 and it's appearance on the pegasos.
"If AmigaOS4.0 is fully finished and running natively on a PPC we will be happy for Hyperion and Amiga Inc. Undoubtedly, in this community there will be more than one person who will copy a legally obtained copy of the operating system onto the Pegasos. How will Amiga Inc. stop this? We cannot control this and neither can they. If AmigaOS4.0 becomes what it is claimed to be – great! We will sell a few more Pegasos machines. Thanks Hyperion! We wish them our best. We have absolutely nothing against this effort."

Personally I think that no hardware developers who don't licence the amiga name will pay money for certification to get os4 running on their boards. However because the pegasos and the amiga one share the same northbridge and BIOS (atm), it should not be difficult for a developer to port os4 across to the pegasos. The question is; Will Hyperion and Amiga Inc allow this without wanting money from Bplan/Thendic France? And does it matter?
List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1Seehund17-Aug-2002 19:50 GMT
Comment 2cOrpse17-Aug-2002 20:02 GMT
Comment 3dakang17-Aug-2002 20:46 GMT
Comment 4Frodon17-Aug-2002 20:50 GMT
Comment 5cOrpse17-Aug-2002 21:05 GMT
Comment 6Marcus Sundman17-Aug-2002 21:12 GMT
Comment 7Mike Veroukis17-Aug-2002 22:54 GMT
Comment 8Kronos18-Aug-2002 03:42 GMT
Comment 9dammy18-Aug-2002 04:15 GMT
Comment 10amigammc18-Aug-2002 04:29 GMT
Comment 11amigammc18-Aug-2002 04:36 GMT
Comment 12Kronos18-Aug-2002 04:53 GMT
Comment 13Marcus Sundman18-Aug-2002 07:03 GMT
Comment 14Anonymous18-Aug-2002 07:20 GMT
Comment 15Anonymous18-Aug-2002 07:38 GMT
Comment 16Lamer18-Aug-2002 07:47 GMT
Comment 17Chis Roccati18-Aug-2002 07:55 GMT
Comment 18Timothy De Groote18-Aug-2002 08:18 GMT
Comment 19DaveW18-Aug-2002 08:46 GMT
Comment 20DaveW18-Aug-2002 08:54 GMT
Comment 21DaveW18-Aug-2002 09:04 GMT
Thendic France comment on OS4.0 : Comment 22 of 165ANN.lu
Posted by .john on 18-Aug-2002 09:09 GMT
Oh my, I should have posted that here (instead I posted it as comment to the
comment, foo bar):
@bill:
@john
If AmigaOS4.0 is fully finished and running natively on a PPC we will be
happy for Hyperion and Amiga Inc. Undoubtedly, in this community there
will be more than one person who will copy a legally obtained copy of
the operating system onto the Pegasos. How will Amiga Inc. stop this? We
cannot control this and neither can they. If AmigaOS4.0 becomes what it
is claimed to be - great! We will sell a few more Pegasos machines.
Thanks Hyperion! We wish them our best. We have absolutely nothing
against this effort.
Oh, bummer. This is not a professional solution, YOU as a proffesional
should be able to advertise. To advertise the Pegasos with :
"Theoretically you might be able to run pirtated copies of OS4 on it."
is very poor attitude (for a professional). Of course, I might have
misunderstood you completly.
@all
Please check out www.morphos-news for our latest post there in the
associated comments section for a discussion on the G3 vs. G4 issues (I
think it is Post #8). Even very code intensive fast twitch games are
running fine on the G3 Pegasos. This is an adequate machine for 990f the
market. The G4 is a great thing, but do not be deceived by clock speed.
The G3s are also fine. For example, there is NOTHING in the Linux GUI
that takes advantage of AltiVec. The speed of the Motorola G4s is nice,
but AltiVec does nothing unless you are running Mac OS X (which is
written for AltiVec) or single precision, 32-bit HPC code.
Already the G3 is a very poor performer these days. I am not interested
in games at all...I play my games in Windows with a fast PC.
I am talking about those things which are 'in' right now and give a lot
of fun: DivX5 encoding. Video-Effects with realtime-preview. Digital8
cams are cheap these days. So are Firewire cards. If you think I can go
anywhere with a single G3/0.6GHz please tell me. I am not talking about
family-album-style or 320x280 reso here. I am talking about semi-prof,
high-level-amateur. Same goes for any rendering. There is never enough
power for these tasks.
Check this out:
Rumors (?) hit the street, Apple might go x86 within the next years.
http://www.osnews.com/story.php?news_id=1393
Facts get reported, that the latest Apple machines are *slower* than the
last generation. Yes, I am talking about those new beasts with DDR-RAM.
I know it is not the CPU, in that case, but some misconception over at
Apple. But they should have known this. Why did it happen ? Not good for
PPC platform.
Then, there has been some SPEC results reported on OSNews.com,
http://www.osnews.com/story.php?news_id=769
which were taken at over at
Heise.de:
http://www.heise.de/ct/english/02/05/182/
Dual G4 gets beaten completly by dual Athlon and single P4 in one of
Apples most important markets: digital video editing.
Story link: http://www.osnews.com/story.php?news_id=1401
Direct link: http://www.digitalvideoediting.com/2002/07_jul/features/cw_macvspc2.htm
While it might well be, that clockspeeds are not all these x86 CPUs have
new architectures as well. Maybe no Altivec (something as you said
rarely used, but well pointedly used in Linux audio- and video-projects
as well as by major companies, developing professional software) support
on x86 but other features, the PPC does not have.
So all in all I do not care, if there is no compiler available, that
utilizes G4 to its full potential.
I also do not care, that some of these benchmarks might have happened by
using code, that was well optimized for x86 but not for G4.
Why should I ? I pay the price. And I certainly will not pay the price
for a Pegasos just in order to run an illegal copy of AmigaOS4.x. If I
could consider the Pegasos an official Amiga licensee, this would be
another story. So I will look out for other options, maybe Shark, but I
have to see how well this one performs and if, yes, if it will be
possible to put that PCI card into a PC. Otherwise no AmigaOS4 for me.
Heck, maybe one day, if someone wrote an emulator for a dual G4 on a
P4/3.2GHz, or such, lol.
And for Linux it is better to go x86 anyway. Just in order to run some
code, that is proprietary and not available as source. This usually is
x86 native, isn't it ?!
So, all in all I might buy a Pegasos with a single G3/600MHz, that only
runs MorphOS software or plain, straight Linux ports. I pay approx. EUR
600 while for less than this money I will get a P4/2.33GHz and a mobo
with DDR-RAM support and 533MHz FSB that beats the Pegasos to pieces.
I feel a bit depressed myself. I had big hopes for the Pegaos. It just
came about too late. Much too late. And without dual G4. This would have
been the only reason for me to go Pegasos, to have a SMP machine, that
does not require active cooling. Did you know, that the P4 is even quite
sophisticated, at least upto 2GHz, with regards to power usage and thus
very well coolable in a manner, that you won't hear too much of a fan ?
I even had a dream to get a Pegasos with dual G4 and fill up the PCI
slots with DCE's long announced "G4 MicroServer" to hopefully build a
super-number-cruncher in my home. Now I will try to do it different.
I'll have to see.
.john
Jump...
#28 Keith Blakemore-Noble
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 23Mekanix18-Aug-2002 09:52 GMT
Comment 24Alkis Tsapanidis18-Aug-2002 10:08 GMT
Comment 25Alkis Tsapanidis18-Aug-2002 10:14 GMT
Comment 26Alkis Tsapanidis18-Aug-2002 10:15 GMT
Comment 27Daniel Miller18-Aug-2002 11:01 GMT
Comment 28Keith Blakemore-Noble18-Aug-2002 11:13 GMT
Comment 29José18-Aug-2002 13:46 GMT
Comment 30amigammc18-Aug-2002 14:00 GMT
Comment 31amigammc18-Aug-2002 14:27 GMT
Comment 32amigammc18-Aug-2002 14:28 GMT
Comment 33amigammc18-Aug-2002 14:34 GMT
Comment 34amigammc18-Aug-2002 14:36 GMT
Comment 35Mike Veroukis18-Aug-2002 14:43 GMT
Comment 36Mekanix18-Aug-2002 14:56 GMT
Comment 37Timothy De Groote18-Aug-2002 15:12 GMT
Comment 38Raquel and Bill18-Aug-2002 15:39 GMT
Comment 39anonymous18-Aug-2002 16:07 GMT
Comment 40cheesegrate18-Aug-2002 16:11 GMT
Comment 41Alkemyst18-Aug-2002 16:27 GMT
Comment 42Kronos18-Aug-2002 16:32 GMT
Comment 43Alkis Tsapanidis18-Aug-2002 16:51 GMT
Comment 44Alkis Tsapanidis18-Aug-2002 16:56 GMT
Comment 45Anonymous18-Aug-2002 16:59 GMT
Comment 46cOrpse18-Aug-2002 17:15 GMT
Comment 47Amifan18-Aug-2002 18:55 GMT
Comment 48dammy18-Aug-2002 18:59 GMT
Comment 49dammy18-Aug-2002 19:03 GMT
Comment 50anonymous18-Aug-2002 19:18 GMT
Comment 51anonymous18-Aug-2002 19:19 GMT
Comment 52anonymous18-Aug-2002 19:24 GMT
Comment 53cOrpse18-Aug-2002 20:08 GMT
Comment 54Daniel Miller18-Aug-2002 21:34 GMT
Comment 55Daniel Miller18-Aug-2002 21:52 GMT
Comment 56Alkemyst19-Aug-2002 00:49 GMT
Comment 57Anonymous19-Aug-2002 01:07 GMT
Comment 58DaveW19-Aug-2002 05:45 GMT
Comment 59DaveW19-Aug-2002 05:47 GMT
Comment 60DaveW19-Aug-2002 06:16 GMT
Comment 61DaveW19-Aug-2002 06:30 GMT
Comment 62Ben Hermans/Hyperion19-Aug-2002 09:20 GMT
Comment 63Alkis Tsapanidis19-Aug-2002 09:49 GMT
Comment 64priest19-Aug-2002 09:50 GMT
Comment 65Alkis Tsapanidis19-Aug-2002 09:56 GMT
Comment 66Anonymous19-Aug-2002 10:05 GMT
Comment 67Anonymous19-Aug-2002 10:08 GMT
Comment 68z519-Aug-2002 10:27 GMT
Comment 69Anonymous19-Aug-2002 10:32 GMT
Comment 70priest19-Aug-2002 10:36 GMT
Comment 71Alkis Tsapanidis19-Aug-2002 10:36 GMT
Comment 72Anonymous19-Aug-2002 10:50 GMT
Comment 73Darrin B19-Aug-2002 10:51 GMT
Comment 74DaveW19-Aug-2002 10:51 GMT
Comment 75OMG19-Aug-2002 10:53 GMT
Comment 76DaveW19-Aug-2002 10:55 GMT
Comment 77Anonymous19-Aug-2002 10:56 GMT
Comment 78Ben Hermans/Hyperion19-Aug-2002 11:10 GMT
Comment 79Ashke81719-Aug-2002 11:48 GMT
Comment 80Anonymous19-Aug-2002 12:02 GMT
Comment 81DaveW19-Aug-2002 12:03 GMT
Comment 82Ben Hermans/Hyperion19-Aug-2002 12:04 GMT
Comment 83DaveW19-Aug-2002 12:06 GMT
Comment 84priest19-Aug-2002 12:24 GMT
Comment 85amigammc19-Aug-2002 12:28 GMT
Comment 86DaveW19-Aug-2002 12:33 GMT
Comment 87amigammc19-Aug-2002 12:33 GMT
Comment 88amigammc19-Aug-2002 12:35 GMT
Comment 89amigammc19-Aug-2002 12:37 GMT
Comment 90Ben Hermans/Hyperion19-Aug-2002 12:37 GMT
Comment 91Anonymous19-Aug-2002 12:38 GMT
Comment 92amigammc19-Aug-2002 12:39 GMT
Comment 93amigammc19-Aug-2002 12:40 GMT
Comment 94DaveW19-Aug-2002 12:40 GMT
Comment 95DaveW19-Aug-2002 12:42 GMT
Comment 96MIB19-Aug-2002 12:49 GMT
Comment 97Alkis Tsapanidis19-Aug-2002 13:08 GMT
Comment 98Samface19-Aug-2002 13:10 GMT
Comment 99DaveW19-Aug-2002 13:12 GMT
Comment 100cOrpse19-Aug-2002 13:12 GMT
Comment 101priest19-Aug-2002 13:12 GMT
Comment 102priest19-Aug-2002 13:15 GMT
Comment 103cheesegrate19-Aug-2002 13:22 GMT
Comment 104Samface19-Aug-2002 13:29 GMT
Comment 105DaveW19-Aug-2002 13:32 GMT
Comment 106Kronos19-Aug-2002 13:33 GMT
Comment 107amigammc19-Aug-2002 13:35 GMT
Comment 108David Scheibler19-Aug-2002 13:37 GMT
Comment 109Samface19-Aug-2002 13:38 GMT
Comment 110Jon19-Aug-2002 13:38 GMT
Comment 111amigammc19-Aug-2002 13:38 GMT
Comment 112cOrpse19-Aug-2002 13:39 GMT
Comment 113DaveW19-Aug-2002 13:40 GMT
Comment 114cOrpse19-Aug-2002 13:45 GMT
Comment 115Jon19-Aug-2002 13:50 GMT
Comment 116Jon19-Aug-2002 13:59 GMT
Comment 117DaveW19-Aug-2002 14:03 GMT
Comment 118cheesegrate19-Aug-2002 14:04 GMT
Comment 119DaveW19-Aug-2002 14:05 GMT
Comment 120cheesegrate19-Aug-2002 14:06 GMT
Comment 121cOrpse19-Aug-2002 14:09 GMT
Comment 122DaveW19-Aug-2002 14:14 GMT
Comment 123cOrpse19-Aug-2002 14:17 GMT
Comment 124DaveW19-Aug-2002 14:19 GMT
Comment 125cheesegrate19-Aug-2002 14:19 GMT
Comment 126DaveW19-Aug-2002 14:21 GMT
Comment 127cheesegrate19-Aug-2002 14:22 GMT
Comment 128DaveW19-Aug-2002 14:24 GMT
Comment 129cOrpse19-Aug-2002 14:25 GMT
Comment 130Bill19-Aug-2002 14:30 GMT
Comment 131.john19-Aug-2002 15:04 GMT
Comment 132Anonymous19-Aug-2002 15:11 GMT
Comment 133cheesegrate19-Aug-2002 15:13 GMT
Comment 134strobe19-Aug-2002 16:36 GMT
Comment 135strobe19-Aug-2002 16:38 GMT
Comment 136priest19-Aug-2002 17:11 GMT
Comment 137priest19-Aug-2002 17:21 GMT
Comment 138Samface19-Aug-2002 17:23 GMT
Comment 139Bill Hoggett19-Aug-2002 17:24 GMT
Comment 140cheesegrate19-Aug-2002 17:49 GMT
Comment 141cheesegrate19-Aug-2002 17:51 GMT
Comment 142Alkis Tsapanidis19-Aug-2002 19:33 GMT
Comment 143Bill Hoggett19-Aug-2002 20:07 GMT
Comment 144Jürgen Lange20-Aug-2002 03:34 GMT
Comment 145Jürgen Lange20-Aug-2002 04:04 GMT
Comment 146simpleppc20-Aug-2002 05:33 GMT
Comment 147priest20-Aug-2002 07:21 GMT
Comment 148JoannaK20-Aug-2002 07:26 GMT
Comment 149Phil20-Aug-2002 10:41 GMT
Comment 150Phil20-Aug-2002 10:54 GMT
Comment 151Kronos20-Aug-2002 11:41 GMT
Comment 152priest20-Aug-2002 11:51 GMT
Comment 153priest20-Aug-2002 11:54 GMT
Comment 154Kronos20-Aug-2002 11:55 GMT
Comment 155priest20-Aug-2002 12:23 GMT
Comment 156Kronos20-Aug-2002 12:59 GMT
Comment 157Anonymous20-Aug-2002 13:05 GMT
Comment 158Bill Hoggett20-Aug-2002 15:15 GMT
Comment 159Kronos20-Aug-2002 15:25 GMT
Comment 160Bill Hoggett20-Aug-2002 16:39 GMT
Comment 161JoannaK20-Aug-2002 17:15 GMT
Comment 162Anonymous20-Aug-2002 22:39 GMT
Comment 163priest21-Aug-2002 11:49 GMT
Comment 164JoannaK21-Aug-2002 19:00 GMT
Comment 165Anonymous21-Aug-2002 20:37 GMT
Back to Top