20-Apr-2024 04:45 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[News] Production Teron CX systems soon for US$500ANN.lu
Posted on 04-Sep-2002 06:51 GMT by JoeBlow44 comments
View flat
View list
www.mai.com/news&events/PressRelease090302.html Production version Teron systems using the Teron CX design will soon be available for purchasing from Mai Logic's strategic partners in the targeted price range of around $500.00 each.
List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1anarchic_teapot04-Sep-2002 08:27 GMT
Comment 2Samface04-Sep-2002 09:07 GMT
Comment 3Anonymous04-Sep-2002 09:31 GMT
Comment 4JoeBlow04-Sep-2002 09:47 GMT
Comment 5Hagge04-Sep-2002 09:50 GMT
Production Teron CX systems soon for US$500 : Comment 6 of 44ANN.lu
Posted by Björn Hagström on 04-Sep-2002 10:51 GMT
In reply to Comment 5 (Hagge):
"SDRAM - Doesn't matter since the PPC cpu isn't fast enough for ddr anyway (PPC7470 or something might be)."
Not entirly true. Between the memory and the CPU there's a north bridge chip. It handles more than just the CPU's requests for memory resouces. Such as AGP and PCI/read writes from/to memory. DMA writing data directly into RAM when reading from an IDE Device. And other I/O coming from the south bridge. Simply put, it's a gateway between the different parts of a modern computer.
Imagine that the cpu is saturating its FSB by reading from memory at 133Mhz. Using SDRAM this would soak up most available bandwidth to the memory modules. With DDR SDRAM (at 133Mhz effective 266Mhz) there would be "lots" of bandwidth left for other parts to use. Such as streaming a divx movie from a UDMA drive while the CPU is decoding previously read data.
(There's more to it all than what is said above, as some hothead will probably say in a reply. But please understand that sometimes it's not needed to go beyond generalisations to show a point..)
/Björn
Jump...
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 7Chris Roccati04-Sep-2002 10:51 GMT
Comment 8José04-Sep-2002 10:54 GMT
Comment 9priest04-Sep-2002 11:31 GMT
Comment 10priest04-Sep-2002 11:32 GMT
Comment 11Anonymous04-Sep-2002 11:38 GMT
Comment 12Anonymous04-Sep-2002 12:07 GMT
Comment 13José04-Sep-2002 16:00 GMT
Comment 14Seehund04-Sep-2002 16:36 GMT
Comment 15Seehund04-Sep-2002 16:51 GMT
Comment 16David Scheibler04-Sep-2002 17:01 GMT
Comment 17Anonymous04-Sep-2002 17:02 GMT
Comment 18JoannaK04-Sep-2002 17:25 GMT
Comment 19JoannaK04-Sep-2002 17:45 GMT
Comment 20takemehomegrandma04-Sep-2002 18:00 GMT
Comment 21priest04-Sep-2002 18:03 GMT
Comment 22Seehund04-Sep-2002 18:26 GMT
Comment 23strobe04-Sep-2002 20:36 GMT
Comment 24Adam Kowalczyk05-Sep-2002 01:18 GMT
Comment 25Anonymous05-Sep-2002 02:45 GMT
Comment 26Solar05-Sep-2002 05:32 GMT
Comment 27Anonymous05-Sep-2002 08:54 GMT
Comment 28priest05-Sep-2002 10:28 GMT
Comment 29priest05-Sep-2002 10:32 GMT
Comment 30JoannaK05-Sep-2002 11:12 GMT
Comment 31JoannaK05-Sep-2002 11:26 GMT
Comment 32Anonymous05-Sep-2002 11:37 GMT
Comment 33Anonymous05-Sep-2002 12:50 GMT
Comment 34Anonymous05-Sep-2002 15:01 GMT
Comment 35priest05-Sep-2002 16:43 GMT
Comment 36priest05-Sep-2002 16:55 GMT
Comment 37Kronos05-Sep-2002 17:00 GMT
Comment 38MonkeyOS05-Sep-2002 17:09 GMT
Comment 39Andrew Deacon05-Sep-2002 17:50 GMT
Comment 40Adam Kowalczyk05-Sep-2002 19:48 GMT
Comment 41JoannaK05-Sep-2002 22:03 GMT
Comment 42priest06-Sep-2002 07:04 GMT
Comment 43vic07-Sep-2002 12:24 GMT
Comment 44Anonymous08-Sep-2002 00:34 GMT
Back to Top