29-Mar-2024 12:32 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[Web] Forbes article on next gen IBM powerPCANN.lu
Posted on 14-Oct-2002 03:03 GMT by Christophe Decanini50 comments
View flat
View list
Here it is.
List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1Pav14-Oct-2002 01:53 GMT
Comment 2Bill "tekmage" Borsari14-Oct-2002 02:58 GMT
Comment 3coldfire14-Oct-2002 04:59 GMT
Comment 4Per14-Oct-2002 05:00 GMT
Comment 5anarchic_teapot14-Oct-2002 07:16 GMT
Comment 6Don Cox14-Oct-2002 07:22 GMT
Comment 7Johan Rönnblom14-Oct-2002 08:14 GMT
Comment 8Lando14-Oct-2002 09:38 GMT
Comment 9sutro14-Oct-2002 09:40 GMT
Comment 10Marcus Sundman14-Oct-2002 09:46 GMT
Comment 11Anonymous14-Oct-2002 10:10 GMT
Comment 12cheesegrate14-Oct-2002 10:15 GMT
Comment 13Freddy14-Oct-2002 10:28 GMT
Comment 14Freddy14-Oct-2002 10:32 GMT
Comment 15sutro14-Oct-2002 11:08 GMT
Comment 16Anonymous14-Oct-2002 11:10 GMT
Comment 17Anonymous14-Oct-2002 11:45 GMT
Comment 18priest14-Oct-2002 11:46 GMT
Comment 19priest14-Oct-2002 11:48 GMT
Comment 20coldfire14-Oct-2002 12:28 GMT
Comment 21priest14-Oct-2002 12:30 GMT
Comment 22Don Cox14-Oct-2002 13:37 GMT
Comment 23Alkemyst14-Oct-2002 13:48 GMT
Comment 24Don Cox14-Oct-2002 16:17 GMT
Comment 25Alkemyst14-Oct-2002 17:17 GMT
Comment 26hgm14-Oct-2002 18:05 GMT
Comment 27strobe14-Oct-2002 20:40 GMT
Comment 28strobe14-Oct-2002 20:50 GMT
Comment 29Abuse14-Oct-2002 21:21 GMT
Comment 30david lowenstein14-Oct-2002 22:29 GMT
Comment 31Anonymous14-Oct-2002 22:41 GMT
Comment 32priest15-Oct-2002 02:27 GMT
Comment 33priest15-Oct-2002 03:23 GMT
Comment 34Ole-Egil15-Oct-2002 03:46 GMT
Comment 35cheesegrate15-Oct-2002 05:20 GMT
Comment 36Abuse15-Oct-2002 06:47 GMT
Comment 37Don Cox15-Oct-2002 08:56 GMT
Comment 38Alkis Tsapanidis15-Oct-2002 15:34 GMT
Comment 39Leki15-Oct-2002 16:05 GMT
Comment 40Alkemyst15-Oct-2002 16:58 GMT
Comment 41strobe15-Oct-2002 18:18 GMT
Comment 42anarchic_teapot16-Oct-2002 04:58 GMT
Comment 43anarchic_teapot16-Oct-2002 05:09 GMT
Comment 44priest16-Oct-2002 06:46 GMT
Comment 45Anonymous16-Oct-2002 14:18 GMT
Forbes article on next gen IBM powerPC : Comment 46 of 50ANN.lu
Posted by strobe on 16-Oct-2002 17:41 GMT
From MacCenteral:
"Microprocessor Report editor in chief Peter Glaskowsky said that the PowerPC 970's memory architecture is proprietary. One of the hurdles that Apple would have to jump to use IBM's latest processor would be to design a memory controller for the part."
Another interesting tidbit is at 1.2Ghz it uses less power than the G4 at 1Ghz despite having more transistors; 19 vs 21.3 respectively. This might be due to the 0.13 micron process but I wouldn't know.
Jump...
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 47david16-Oct-2002 19:08 GMT
Comment 48david16-Oct-2002 19:11 GMT
Comment 49Hammer(Same entity as in amiga.org's forum)17-Oct-2002 00:56 GMT
Comment 50Anonymous17-Oct-2002 09:01 GMT
Back to Top