24-Apr-2024 21:02 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[Web] Forbes article on next gen IBM powerPCANN.lu
Posted on 14-Oct-2002 03:03 GMT by Christophe Decanini50 comments
View flat
View list
Here it is.
List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1Pav14-Oct-2002 01:53 GMT
Comment 2Bill "tekmage" Borsari14-Oct-2002 02:58 GMT
Comment 3coldfire14-Oct-2002 04:59 GMT
Comment 4Per14-Oct-2002 05:00 GMT
Comment 5anarchic_teapot14-Oct-2002 07:16 GMT
Comment 6Don Cox14-Oct-2002 07:22 GMT
Comment 7Johan Rönnblom14-Oct-2002 08:14 GMT
Comment 8Lando14-Oct-2002 09:38 GMT
Comment 9sutro14-Oct-2002 09:40 GMT
Comment 10Marcus Sundman14-Oct-2002 09:46 GMT
Comment 11Anonymous14-Oct-2002 10:10 GMT
Comment 12cheesegrate14-Oct-2002 10:15 GMT
Comment 13Freddy14-Oct-2002 10:28 GMT
Comment 14Freddy14-Oct-2002 10:32 GMT
Comment 15sutro14-Oct-2002 11:08 GMT
Comment 16Anonymous14-Oct-2002 11:10 GMT
Comment 17Anonymous14-Oct-2002 11:45 GMT
Comment 18priest14-Oct-2002 11:46 GMT
Comment 19priest14-Oct-2002 11:48 GMT
Comment 20coldfire14-Oct-2002 12:28 GMT
Comment 21priest14-Oct-2002 12:30 GMT
Comment 22Don Cox14-Oct-2002 13:37 GMT
Comment 23Alkemyst14-Oct-2002 13:48 GMT
Comment 24Don Cox14-Oct-2002 16:17 GMT
Comment 25Alkemyst14-Oct-2002 17:17 GMT
Comment 26hgm14-Oct-2002 18:05 GMT
Comment 27strobe14-Oct-2002 20:40 GMT
Comment 28strobe14-Oct-2002 20:50 GMT
Comment 29Abuse14-Oct-2002 21:21 GMT
Comment 30david lowenstein14-Oct-2002 22:29 GMT
Comment 31Anonymous14-Oct-2002 22:41 GMT
Comment 32priest15-Oct-2002 02:27 GMT
Comment 33priest15-Oct-2002 03:23 GMT
Comment 34Ole-Egil15-Oct-2002 03:46 GMT
Comment 35cheesegrate15-Oct-2002 05:20 GMT
Comment 36Abuse15-Oct-2002 06:47 GMT
Comment 37Don Cox15-Oct-2002 08:56 GMT
Comment 38Alkis Tsapanidis15-Oct-2002 15:34 GMT
Comment 39Leki15-Oct-2002 16:05 GMT
Comment 40Alkemyst15-Oct-2002 16:58 GMT
Comment 41strobe15-Oct-2002 18:18 GMT
Comment 42anarchic_teapot16-Oct-2002 04:58 GMT
Comment 43anarchic_teapot16-Oct-2002 05:09 GMT
Comment 44priest16-Oct-2002 06:46 GMT
Comment 45Anonymous16-Oct-2002 14:18 GMT
Comment 46strobe16-Oct-2002 17:41 GMT
Comment 47david16-Oct-2002 19:08 GMT
Comment 48david16-Oct-2002 19:11 GMT
Comment 49Hammer(Same entity as in amiga.org's forum)17-Oct-2002 00:56 GMT
Forbes article on next gen IBM powerPC : Comment 50 of 50ANN.lu
Posted by Anonymous on 17-Oct-2002 09:01 GMT
In reply to Comment 49 (Hammer(Same entity as in amiga.org's forum)):
>A 2X speed 1GHz 750FX(current) is not a quantum leap in computing speed (i.e. imagine o/c 2Ghz 750FX chip).
>PPC 970(future) was only stated to be twice as fast when compared to the existing IBM's PPC flagchip.
Are you aware this was only refering to the clockspeed?
SPEC numbers are in the region of 3GHz+ PPCs.
>In the case of top-of-the-line Intel processors. Did you forgotten Itanium II(Current)(and soon to be released Itanium III(future)?
Not really a desktop chip imho - four times the amount of transistors of PPC970 which is quite comparable to Pentium4 in size (a bit smaller even).
>PPC solution was behind(compared to X86 solution) with the following benckmarks
Its current FPU is not very special, that's well-known.
The PPC970 will be good for 7.2 gigaflops in theory (actually 5.22 dhrystone-gflops).
>(Note that G4 did well in RC5, and the G4 was competitive with X86s in Photonshop 7 test)
PPC really comes into its own territory when Altivec is used - up to 8 flops/MHz :-)
While an optimal use is realized with asm code, I think there will be more support to
Jump...
TopPrevious commentbottom
Back to Top