20-Apr-2024 11:27 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[Forum] MorphOS 68k speedANN.lu
Posted on 03-Nov-2002 12:34 GMT by Anonymous (Edited on 2002-11-03 18:27:14 GMT by Teemu I. Yliselä)23 comments
View flat
View list
At http://www.amiga-news.de/forum/thread.php3?id=4353&start=21&BoardID=4 (german) two Betatesters make statements regarding MorphOS' 68k-emu speed. No exact numbers, but for example some rendering with Cinema4D on a Pegasos-600MHz (and debug-output on) seems to be at least as fast or even faster as with WinUAE-JIT on a 1-GHz-PC.
List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1Alkis Tsapanidis03-Nov-2002 11:43 GMT
Comment 2Alkis Tsapanidis03-Nov-2002 11:45 GMT
Comment 3Rob03-Nov-2002 12:35 GMT
Comment 4Alkis Tsapanidis03-Nov-2002 12:43 GMT
Comment 5Anonymous03-Nov-2002 12:44 GMT
Comment 6Anonymous03-Nov-2002 12:44 GMT
Comment 7Alkis Tsapanidis03-Nov-2002 12:52 GMT
Comment 8Anonymous03-Nov-2002 13:12 GMT
Comment 9Alkis Tsapanidis03-Nov-2002 14:25 GMT
MorphOS 68k speed : Comment 10 of 23ANN.lu
Posted by Kjetil on 03-Nov-2002 14:42 GMT
In reply to Comment 8 (Anonymous):
Don’t se where you are going with you’re comment,
Rendering requires a grate deal of CPU speed and sense this is the same program and the same OS, it is basically like compare JIT against JIT. Take in count that the i686 have to do an byte switch for every DWORD or LONG WORD operation, And that an hole Windows system even share some of CPU restores with UAE, this result only shows the that i686 is more power full then PPC to day.
The result do not show that PPC is faster then i686 1Ghz is only show the benefit of having the same endien on 68000 and PPC Cpu’s, this is way I prefer an PPC over an I686 when is comes to running AmigaOS and I’m not to worried about the MHZ, Motorola will catch up any way. If they don’t well way not AROS.
Jump...
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 11Chris03-Nov-2002 15:59 GMT
Comment 12Ben Hermans/Hyperion03-Nov-2002 16:06 GMT
Comment 13Don Cox03-Nov-2002 16:13 GMT
Comment 14Christophe Decanini03-Nov-2002 16:50 GMT
Comment 15Kjetil03-Nov-2002 17:18 GMT
Comment 16Alkis Tsapanidis03-Nov-2002 18:44 GMT
Comment 17Mike Veroukis03-Nov-2002 21:01 GMT
Comment 18Christophe Decanini03-Nov-2002 21:10 GMT
Comment 19Ole-Egil04-Nov-2002 07:08 GMT
Comment 20Mike Veroukis04-Nov-2002 16:09 GMT
Comment 21Anonymous04-Nov-2002 16:21 GMT
Comment 22Anonymous04-Nov-2002 16:22 GMT
Comment 23strobe04-Nov-2002 22:17 GMT
Back to Top