18-Apr-2024 13:55 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[News] AmigaOS 4.0 to include Python?ANN.lu
Posted on 24-Nov-2002 20:36 GMT by Bill Hoggett94 comments
View flat
View list
According to Irmen de Jong, the AmigaPython website maintainer, the Python programming language may be included as standard with AmigaOS 4.0.

From the AmigaPython site:

UPDATE november 2002: from very reliable sources I know that AmigaPython might become part of the new Amiga OS 4.0 ! What AREXX was for AmigaDOS 2.x and 3.x, AmigaPython might be for the next generation of Amiga OS (and much more powerful of course)

Further information about Python is available at the Python Home Page.

List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1Anonymous24-Nov-2002 19:42 GMT
Comment 2- GALAXY -24-Nov-2002 19:57 GMT
Comment 3No_name24-Nov-2002 20:05 GMT
Comment 4Bill Hoggett24-Nov-2002 20:24 GMT
Comment 5Anonymous24-Nov-2002 20:38 GMT
Comment 6Bill Hoggett24-Nov-2002 20:52 GMT
Comment 7Don Cox24-Nov-2002 21:02 GMT
Comment 8Q24-Nov-2002 21:09 GMT
Comment 9John Block24-Nov-2002 21:25 GMT
Comment 10David Shipman24-Nov-2002 21:44 GMT
Comment 11José24-Nov-2002 21:45 GMT
Comment 12- GALAXY -24-Nov-2002 21:50 GMT
Comment 13tinman24-Nov-2002 21:51 GMT
Comment 14Anonymous24-Nov-2002 22:03 GMT
Comment 15cOrpse24-Nov-2002 22:12 GMT
Comment 16Anonymous24-Nov-2002 22:40 GMT
Comment 17Kolbjørn Barmen24-Nov-2002 23:58 GMT
Comment 18Chris Allen25-Nov-2002 00:19 GMT
Comment 193seas25-Nov-2002 00:35 GMT
Comment 20George Wyche25-Nov-2002 03:36 GMT
Comment 21Petr Krenzelok25-Nov-2002 04:26 GMT
Comment 22Anonymous25-Nov-2002 05:46 GMT
Comment 23Lennart Fridén25-Nov-2002 06:36 GMT
Comment 24DB25-Nov-2002 06:53 GMT
Comment 25ANONYMOUS25-Nov-2002 07:06 GMT
Comment 26Lennart Fridén25-Nov-2002 07:48 GMT
Comment 27Don Cox25-Nov-2002 08:41 GMT
Comment 28John Block25-Nov-2002 09:14 GMT
Comment 29Ole-Egil25-Nov-2002 09:28 GMT
Comment 30Martin Blom25-Nov-2002 09:39 GMT
Comment 31John Block25-Nov-2002 09:57 GMT
Comment 32- GALAXY -25-Nov-2002 10:05 GMT
Comment 33Ole-Egil25-Nov-2002 10:13 GMT
Comment 34Bill Hoggett25-Nov-2002 10:30 GMT
Comment 35Petr Krenzelok25-Nov-2002 10:54 GMT
Comment 36John Block25-Nov-2002 10:59 GMT
Comment 37Kolbjørn Barmen25-Nov-2002 11:06 GMT
Comment 38Kolbjørn Barmen25-Nov-2002 11:09 GMT
Comment 39- GALAXY -25-Nov-2002 11:18 GMT
Comment 40Petr Krenzelok25-Nov-2002 11:25 GMT
Comment 41- GALAXY -25-Nov-2002 11:30 GMT
Comment 42Ben Hermans/Hyperion25-Nov-2002 12:00 GMT
Comment 43Anonymous25-Nov-2002 12:11 GMT
Comment 44Hans-Joerg Frieden25-Nov-2002 12:15 GMT
Comment 45Hans-Joerg Frieden25-Nov-2002 12:20 GMT
Comment 46Paul Hill25-Nov-2002 13:49 GMT
Comment 47DaveW25-Nov-2002 14:04 GMT
Comment 48Simon B25-Nov-2002 15:52 GMT
Comment 49JoannaK25-Nov-2002 16:13 GMT
Comment 50Bill Hoggett25-Nov-2002 16:23 GMT
Comment 51amiraoul25-Nov-2002 16:26 GMT
Comment 52Anonymous25-Nov-2002 16:31 GMT
Comment 53JoannaK25-Nov-2002 16:31 GMT
Comment 54amiraoul25-Nov-2002 16:43 GMT
Comment 55JoannaK25-Nov-2002 16:47 GMT
Comment 56Christoph Gutjahr25-Nov-2002 16:52 GMT
Comment 57SimoAmi25-Nov-2002 16:55 GMT
Comment 58Ole-Egil25-Nov-2002 16:56 GMT
Comment 59Phara25-Nov-2002 17:00 GMT
Comment 60amiraoul25-Nov-2002 17:02 GMT
Comment 61Velcro25-Nov-2002 17:08 GMT
Comment 62JoannaK25-Nov-2002 17:25 GMT
Comment 63JoannaK25-Nov-2002 17:29 GMT
Comment 64Ben Hermans/Hyperion25-Nov-2002 17:36 GMT
Comment 65JoannaK25-Nov-2002 17:43 GMT
Comment 66Don Cox25-Nov-2002 17:55 GMT
Comment 67Christophe Decanini25-Nov-2002 17:59 GMT
Comment 68Don Cox25-Nov-2002 18:00 GMT
Comment 69Don Cox25-Nov-2002 18:05 GMT
Comment 70Bill Hoggett25-Nov-2002 18:16 GMT
Comment 71Christophe Decanini25-Nov-2002 18:49 GMT
Comment 72amiraoul25-Nov-2002 20:25 GMT
AmigaOS 4.0 to include Python? : Comment 73 of 94ANN.lu
Posted by Bill Hoggett on 25-Nov-2002 20:40 GMT
In reply to Comment 71 (Christophe Decanini):
> Well, I don't think either Ben or AmigaInc will say that they do not have
> the right to distribute it as it is obvious they did it before without
> paying attention to the AREXX guy that did not get any royalties.
You're jumping to conclusions. What makes you think that the license was royalty based?
> For the contract to stand, the amount of money stipuled into it (if any)
> should have been payed way back. Now if the Arexx author does not care
> about arexx being freely distributed ...
That's not how it works. If the alleged non-payment of money is fact and constitutes a breach of contract, then that gave Bill Hawes the right to terminate Commodore's contract. If the contract was royalty based, then yes, he would still be able to terminate the contract with the current holders.
However, if the contract was based on a one-off payment, then Bill Hawes' ability to terminate the contract will have expired at some point (statutory limits) prior to Commodore's demise. Certainly none of the companies that followed Commodore (Elbox, Gateway, Amiga Inc.) would have had any obligation towards Mr Hawes.
> What if Thendic decide to include it now ? Maybe they can even pay the
> Arexx author if he is still alive :)
I daresay Bill Hawes is still alive, but I don't see the relevance of discussing Thendic here.
> A few years ago when there was an effort to have AmigaOS opensource the
> answer was that it was a legal nightmare as parts of the AmigaOS where
> third parties. I wonder how much code is still in this situation. Hopefully
> not a lot.
That only means that they have a license to distribute the binary, and nothing else. Therefore they would not have been able to release the ARexx source code anyway. As for the rest of the proprietary stuff that was licensed rather than owned, most of it was probably replaceable.
Jump...
#74 Christophe Decanini #90 Don Cox
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 74Christophe Decanini25-Nov-2002 20:54 GMT
Comment 75Bill Hoggett25-Nov-2002 21:32 GMT
Comment 76.jon25-Nov-2002 21:32 GMT
Comment 77kjetil26-Nov-2002 01:05 GMT
Comment 78Hans-Joerg Frieden26-Nov-2002 11:13 GMT
Comment 79Hans-Joerg Frieden26-Nov-2002 11:20 GMT
Comment 80DaveW26-Nov-2002 13:18 GMT
Comment 81DaveW26-Nov-2002 14:08 GMT
Comment 82Hans-Joerg Frieden26-Nov-2002 17:08 GMT
Comment 83Olaf Barthel27-Nov-2002 07:01 GMT
Comment 84Olaf Barthel27-Nov-2002 07:13 GMT
Comment 85JoannaK27-Nov-2002 08:07 GMT
Comment 86Georg Steger27-Nov-2002 14:55 GMT
Comment 87Don Cox27-Nov-2002 16:05 GMT
Comment 88Don Cox27-Nov-2002 16:11 GMT
Comment 89Kjetil27-Nov-2002 16:11 GMT
Comment 90Don Cox27-Nov-2002 16:15 GMT
Comment 91Don Cox27-Nov-2002 16:21 GMT
Comment 92Olaf Barthel27-Nov-2002 16:53 GMT
Comment 93Olaf Barthel27-Nov-2002 16:56 GMT
Comment 94Ben Hermans/Hyperion27-Nov-2002 18:15 GMT
Back to Top