26-Apr-2024 18:16 GMT.		 UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[Web] Aros.org updateANN.lu
Posted on 29-Nov-2002 23:11 GMT by 4pLaY36 comments
View flat
View list
Some new pics have been put online under http://www.aros.org/screenshots.html these include 14 new screenshots of our hdtoolbox clone as well as a picture of the invetor of Zune! (our mui clone) David "Reez" Bondage man! another goodie will SOON be revealed! this weekend if the final touches can be made to our new Mascot! and SHE is cute ;)
List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1Anonymous29-Nov-2002 22:58 GMT
Comment 24pLaY29-Nov-2002 23:06 GMT
Comment 3onceandforall29-Nov-2002 23:11 GMT
Comment 4Anonymous30-Nov-2002 04:16 GMT
Comment 5ehaines30-Nov-2002 04:56 GMT
Comment 6takemehomegrandma30-Nov-2002 10:40 GMT
Comment 74pLaY30-Nov-2002 11:08 GMT
Comment 8Fabio Alemagna30-Nov-2002 11:26 GMT
Comment 9takemehomegrandma30-Nov-2002 11:52 GMT
Comment 10Don Cox30-Nov-2002 11:58 GMT
Comment 114pLaY30-Nov-2002 12:00 GMT
Comment 12Fabio Alemagna30-Nov-2002 12:07 GMT
Aros.org update : Comment 13 of 36ANN.lu
Posted by takemehomegrandma on 30-Nov-2002 12:11 GMT
In reply to Comment 8 (Fabio Alemagna):
> _4play_ has been a bit rude, and forgive him for that,
Oh, that's OK! Straight forward, yes, but not particularly rude in my eyes.
:-)
> However, there's another problem ... The explanation is rather
> simple: endianess. Now, if you don't know what endianess is, let's it
> suffice as explanation ...
Thank you for the explanation. It helped.
> ... but that "native" code is far from being optimal code, and it shows it
> in terms of worse performances compared to the "real" native code.' ... If that's
> acceptable for an emulator, it surely is not for an OS.
Optimal or not, it sure would fly on a cheap 2GHz x86 system, wouldn't it? But OK, I'll drop this now. I honestly didn't know that there were such big problems involved.
> As for the rest that _4play_ said, although he said it in a rough manner,
> it's all right: we are an Open Source project, we work on what is more fun,
> on what appeal us, and on what we believe is worth working on, and we don't
> feel urgent to work on a 68k emulator, we have to get the OS finished, and
> we believe in our capabilities enough to think that we'll be able to stand
> on our own legs, without having to emulate old software.
I realize that. Do what you have to do. And good luck! :-)
Jump...
#16 Fabio Alemagna
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 14takemehomegrandma30-Nov-2002 12:21 GMT
Comment 15Fabio Alemagna30-Nov-2002 13:18 GMT
Comment 16Fabio Alemagna30-Nov-2002 13:19 GMT
Comment 17takemehomegrandma30-Nov-2002 13:27 GMT
Comment 18dammy30-Nov-2002 15:07 GMT
Comment 19Crumb //AAT30-Nov-2002 15:49 GMT
Comment 204pLaY30-Nov-2002 15:58 GMT
Comment 214pLaY30-Nov-2002 15:58 GMT
Comment 224pLaY30-Nov-2002 15:59 GMT
Comment 23Fabio Alemagna30-Nov-2002 16:04 GMT
Comment 24dammy30-Nov-2002 17:04 GMT
Comment 25Christophe Decanini30-Nov-2002 17:57 GMT
Comment 26Don Cox30-Nov-2002 18:18 GMT
Comment 27takemehomegrandma30-Nov-2002 21:07 GMT
Comment 28takemehomegrandma30-Nov-2002 21:11 GMT
Comment 29strobe01-Dec-2002 04:11 GMT
Comment 30strobe01-Dec-2002 04:12 GMT
Comment 31strobe01-Dec-2002 04:22 GMT
Comment 32Fabio Alemagna01-Dec-2002 09:42 GMT
Comment 33strobe01-Dec-2002 10:25 GMT
Comment 34Kjetil01-Dec-2002 18:19 GMT
Comment 35Fabio Alemagna01-Dec-2002 20:31 GMT
Comment 36It's MEEE!!!02-Dec-2002 12:43 GMT
Back to Top