28-Mar-2024 15:23 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[News] AmigaOne @ Amiga+Retro Computing 2002ANN.lu
Posted on 30-Nov-2002 13:06 GMT by catohagen52 comments
View flat
View list
After it was clear that neither Amiga Inc., nor Eyetech and Hyperion Entertainment will present the new AmigaOne at the AMIGA + RETRO COMPUTING 2002, we started thinking about how to get an AmigaOne to the show anyway.

Source : Amiga-news.de The solution is an offer from Computer City. Owner Ron van Herk provides his own AmigaOne, and the members of the Amiga-Club im BTX & Internet will do the presentation.

The computer on display is an AmigaOneSE-G3 with 750CXe 600 MHz CPU, equipped with 128 MB SDRAM PC133 and an ATI Radeion 7000 64 MB SDR VGA graphics card with TV-Out, and of course the Cherry Cybo@rd-keyboard that's being sold by Computer City. The operating system installed is only a Suse LinuxPPC 7.3, but it'll give an impression of the hardware.
List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1takemehomegrandma30-Nov-2002 12:37 GMT
Comment 2Mickael30-Nov-2002 13:29 GMT
Comment 3catohagen30-Nov-2002 13:31 GMT
Comment 4Anonymous30-Nov-2002 13:34 GMT
Comment 5JoannaK30-Nov-2002 13:35 GMT
Comment 6takemehomegrandma30-Nov-2002 13:36 GMT
Comment 7JoannaK30-Nov-2002 13:55 GMT
Comment 8STRICQ30-Nov-2002 13:57 GMT
Comment 9catohagen30-Nov-2002 14:00 GMT
Comment 10Mickael30-Nov-2002 14:21 GMT
Comment 11Mickael30-Nov-2002 14:27 GMT
Comment 12Don Cox30-Nov-2002 14:47 GMT
Comment 13amigammc30-Nov-2002 14:55 GMT
Comment 14Don Cox30-Nov-2002 14:57 GMT
Comment 15David Scheibler30-Nov-2002 14:59 GMT
AmigaOne @ Amiga+Retro Computing 2002 : Comment 16 of 52ANN.lu
Posted by dammy on 30-Nov-2002 14:59 GMT
In reply to Comment 13 (amigammc):
Then again, Petro wasn't well like by his office politics either. But I shouldn't be dwelling on history. I guess it doesn't matter since apart of the "Amiga" fleet will be there demoing the base OS that DE will be eventually running on, MOS. =)
Dammy
Jump...
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 17Mickael30-Nov-2002 15:05 GMT
Comment 18Don Cox30-Nov-2002 15:41 GMT
Comment 19Janne Sirén30-Nov-2002 16:05 GMT
Comment 20bbrv30-Nov-2002 16:07 GMT
Comment 21takemehomegrandma30-Nov-2002 16:16 GMT
Comment 22Don Cox30-Nov-2002 16:41 GMT
Comment 23takemehomegrandma30-Nov-2002 17:30 GMT
Comment 24ObiWan30-Nov-2002 17:51 GMT
Comment 25JoannaK30-Nov-2002 17:59 GMT
Comment 26Anonymous30-Nov-2002 18:06 GMT
Comment 27Anonymous30-Nov-2002 18:08 GMT
Comment 28JoannaK30-Nov-2002 18:24 GMT
Comment 29Anonymous30-Nov-2002 18:38 GMT
Comment 30ObiWan30-Nov-2002 18:38 GMT
Comment 31Alkemyst30-Nov-2002 18:57 GMT
Comment 32Alkemyst30-Nov-2002 19:02 GMT
Comment 33Some Farker01-Dec-2002 02:35 GMT
Comment 34strobe01-Dec-2002 04:01 GMT
Comment 35Sjoerd01-Dec-2002 08:37 GMT
Comment 36Phill01-Dec-2002 08:41 GMT
Comment 37Sjoerd01-Dec-2002 08:48 GMT
Comment 38JoannaK01-Dec-2002 09:18 GMT
Comment 39JoannaK01-Dec-2002 10:08 GMT
Comment 40NeRP01-Dec-2002 10:29 GMT
Comment 41reflect01-Dec-2002 10:56 GMT
Comment 42Anonymous01-Dec-2002 11:43 GMT
Comment 43takemehomegrandma01-Dec-2002 19:15 GMT
Comment 44NeRP01-Dec-2002 20:18 GMT
Comment 45takemehomegrandma01-Dec-2002 21:22 GMT
Comment 46JoannaK01-Dec-2002 22:47 GMT
Comment 47Daniel Miller02-Dec-2002 00:50 GMT
Comment 48strobe02-Dec-2002 01:06 GMT
Comment 49JoannaK02-Dec-2002 01:12 GMT
Comment 50Piru02-Dec-2002 06:20 GMT
Comment 51Anonymous02-Dec-2002 13:59 GMT
Comment 52JoannaK02-Dec-2002 18:58 GMT
Back to Top