23-Apr-2024 06:45 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[Forum] blast from the pastANN.lu
Posted on 18-Dec-2002 08:56 GMT by Piru55 comments
View flat
View list
Remember the days H&P was still alive and kicking? Remember the WarpUP vs. PowerUP wars? Remember the days of speculation about new hardware and OS? Here is a massive but entertaining thread from the past. Several personalities from the "camps" of today posted in it. Funnily maybe the biggest player back then - H&P - is somewhat out of the game now, but some of the players remain.

If you read that thread now, remember these issues:

- StormC as a compiler is dead. StormC use GCC now.

- EHF (extended hunk format) is dead, ELF is the future (used in both OS4 and MOS).

- H&P 68k emulation never surfaced.

- WarpUP ramlib crashes were due to opening disk based libraries in LibInit of the library and thus causing recursive ramlib calls and stack overflow, not due to some "anti-warpup" code. [sidenote: Current Warp3D *still* crash due to these OpenLibrary calls when it open its' sub-lib in LibInit, unless you have ramlib stack patched. There is a easy way to fix these crashes, open the sublibs in LIB_OPEN...]

- There now is a system that run 68K, WOS & PUP apps on PPC only hardware.

I'm not saying that you should be able to predict the future, but some guys seem to have been right more than 50% of the time.

List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1Anonymous18-Dec-2002 08:20 GMT
Comment 2Nicolas Sallin18-Dec-2002 08:24 GMT
Comment 3Rick Pezzimenti18-Dec-2002 08:36 GMT
Comment 4Nicolas Sallin18-Dec-2002 09:55 GMT
Comment 5JoannaK18-Dec-2002 11:13 GMT
Comment 6amorel18-Dec-2002 11:43 GMT
Comment 7priest18-Dec-2002 13:21 GMT
Comment 8Leif18-Dec-2002 14:14 GMT
Comment 9priest18-Dec-2002 14:26 GMT
Comment 10Anonymous18-Dec-2002 14:56 GMT
Comment 11Emeric SH18-Dec-2002 15:16 GMT
Comment 12Lando18-Dec-2002 15:21 GMT
Comment 13IT's MEEE!!!18-Dec-2002 15:24 GMT
Comment 14priest18-Dec-2002 15:31 GMT
Comment 15Gregg18-Dec-2002 15:41 GMT
Comment 16MonkeyOS18-Dec-2002 16:09 GMT
Comment 17Anonymous18-Dec-2002 17:19 GMT
Comment 18Herwarn18-Dec-2002 17:59 GMT
Comment 19Steffen Haeuser18-Dec-2002 18:31 GMT
Comment 20itix18-Dec-2002 18:31 GMT
Comment 21Herwarn18-Dec-2002 18:50 GMT
Comment 22itix18-Dec-2002 19:09 GMT
Comment 23turtle on quaaludes18-Dec-2002 19:13 GMT
Comment 24Fabio Alemagna18-Dec-2002 19:15 GMT
blast from the past : Comment 25 of 55ANN.lu
Posted by Fabio Alemagna on 18-Dec-2002 19:26 GMT
In reply to Comment 19 (Steffen Haeuser):
> What the Coward-whom-I'd-like-to-sue-if-I'd-know-who-he-is

Steffen, you'd like to sue too many people, I suggest you to calm down, cause in the end this attitude can only hurt yourself.

> did ignore is the fact that what I did not like about "ELF in AmigaOS" and why > at that time I was totally against it.

That phrase doesn't make much sense... perhaps you missed to say something?


> At that time (yes, this was still before the thread cited) you could not even > directly start PowerUP-programs but had to use something like "runelf").


Well, unless you patch LoadSeg & C. that's the only way to do it, even with WarpOS.

> Programs using PowerUP could not directly - at that time, later there was a
> LoadSeg-Patch - load AmigaOS Executables. Certain people even wanted to get
> "rid of Shared Libraries in favour of ELF Objects, as the Amiga Shared Library > design is outdated".

That makes sense indeed, although I'd not get rid of the old system altogether. A mixture of both would be really welcome. After all, if I'm not mistaken, AOS4 will have it, athough one-way only (ie, user->library and not also user<-library).

As for the rest of your topic, Steffen, try to calm down a bit: you behave exactly like the ones you blame. Show more professionalism, for <your deity>'s sake!
Jump...
#26 Fabio Alemagna #27 Steffen Haeuser
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 26Fabio Alemagna18-Dec-2002 19:30 GMT
Comment 27Steffen Haeuser18-Dec-2002 20:08 GMT
Comment 28JoannaK18-Dec-2002 20:13 GMT
Comment 29Johan Rönnblom18-Dec-2002 20:24 GMT
Comment 30Fabio Alemagna18-Dec-2002 20:28 GMT
Comment 31Keith Blakemore-Noble18-Dec-2002 21:24 GMT
Comment 32Nicolas Sallin18-Dec-2002 22:15 GMT
Comment 33Steffen Haeuser18-Dec-2002 22:50 GMT
Comment 34catohagen18-Dec-2002 22:51 GMT
Comment 35catohagen18-Dec-2002 22:57 GMT
Comment 36Johan Rönnblom18-Dec-2002 23:04 GMT
Comment 37Anonymous18-Dec-2002 23:30 GMT
Comment 38ehaines19-Dec-2002 00:25 GMT
Comment 39amorel19-Dec-2002 03:58 GMT
Comment 40amorel19-Dec-2002 04:15 GMT
Comment 41priest19-Dec-2002 04:30 GMT
Comment 42priest19-Dec-2002 04:33 GMT
Comment 43JoannaK19-Dec-2002 06:53 GMT
Comment 44priest19-Dec-2002 07:33 GMT
Comment 45Kolbjørn Barmen19-Dec-2002 07:46 GMT
Comment 46Janne Sirén19-Dec-2002 08:40 GMT
Comment 47Emmanuel Lesueur19-Dec-2002 08:55 GMT
Comment 48does it matter19-Dec-2002 11:30 GMT
Comment 49Steffen Haeuser19-Dec-2002 11:33 GMT
Comment 50Fabio Alemagna19-Dec-2002 12:10 GMT
Comment 51MonkeyOS19-Dec-2002 12:17 GMT
Comment 52Fabio Alemagna19-Dec-2002 12:49 GMT
Comment 53Anonymous19-Dec-2002 15:01 GMT
Comment 54Keith Blakemore-Noble19-Dec-2002 19:52 GMT
Comment 55priest20-Dec-2002 10:15 GMT
Back to Top