19-Apr-2024 06:48 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[Forum] blast from the pastANN.lu
Posted on 18-Dec-2002 08:56 GMT by Piru55 comments
View flat
View list
Remember the days H&P was still alive and kicking? Remember the WarpUP vs. PowerUP wars? Remember the days of speculation about new hardware and OS? Here is a massive but entertaining thread from the past. Several personalities from the "camps" of today posted in it. Funnily maybe the biggest player back then - H&P - is somewhat out of the game now, but some of the players remain.

If you read that thread now, remember these issues:

- StormC as a compiler is dead. StormC use GCC now.

- EHF (extended hunk format) is dead, ELF is the future (used in both OS4 and MOS).

- H&P 68k emulation never surfaced.

- WarpUP ramlib crashes were due to opening disk based libraries in LibInit of the library and thus causing recursive ramlib calls and stack overflow, not due to some "anti-warpup" code. [sidenote: Current Warp3D *still* crash due to these OpenLibrary calls when it open its' sub-lib in LibInit, unless you have ramlib stack patched. There is a easy way to fix these crashes, open the sublibs in LIB_OPEN...]

- There now is a system that run 68K, WOS & PUP apps on PPC only hardware.

I'm not saying that you should be able to predict the future, but some guys seem to have been right more than 50% of the time.

List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1Anonymous18-Dec-2002 08:20 GMT
Comment 2Nicolas Sallin18-Dec-2002 08:24 GMT
Comment 3Rick Pezzimenti18-Dec-2002 08:36 GMT
Comment 4Nicolas Sallin18-Dec-2002 09:55 GMT
Comment 5JoannaK18-Dec-2002 11:13 GMT
Comment 6amorel18-Dec-2002 11:43 GMT
Comment 7priest18-Dec-2002 13:21 GMT
Comment 8Leif18-Dec-2002 14:14 GMT
Comment 9priest18-Dec-2002 14:26 GMT
Comment 10Anonymous18-Dec-2002 14:56 GMT
Comment 11Emeric SH18-Dec-2002 15:16 GMT
Comment 12Lando18-Dec-2002 15:21 GMT
Comment 13IT's MEEE!!!18-Dec-2002 15:24 GMT
Comment 14priest18-Dec-2002 15:31 GMT
Comment 15Gregg18-Dec-2002 15:41 GMT
Comment 16MonkeyOS18-Dec-2002 16:09 GMT
Comment 17Anonymous18-Dec-2002 17:19 GMT
Comment 18Herwarn18-Dec-2002 17:59 GMT
Comment 19Steffen Haeuser18-Dec-2002 18:31 GMT
Comment 20itix18-Dec-2002 18:31 GMT
Comment 21Herwarn18-Dec-2002 18:50 GMT
Comment 22itix18-Dec-2002 19:09 GMT
Comment 23turtle on quaaludes18-Dec-2002 19:13 GMT
Comment 24Fabio Alemagna18-Dec-2002 19:15 GMT
Comment 25Fabio Alemagna18-Dec-2002 19:26 GMT
Comment 26Fabio Alemagna18-Dec-2002 19:30 GMT
blast from the past : Comment 27 of 55ANN.lu
Posted by Steffen Haeuser on 18-Dec-2002 20:08 GMT
In reply to Comment 25 (Fabio Alemagna):
>Steffen, you'd like to sue too many people, I suggest you to calm down, cause in the end this attitude can only hurt yourself.

And I assume you would just accept if someone calls you "incompetent" or
"stupid" or other insults? Up to now I never sued anybody, but sometimes
I think this would be a good thing to do (of course with these public Boards there is the problem
people can always claim "this was someone else typing on my computer").

I have no problem with people with really strange opinions or such - but
I *do* have a problem with personal insults in the public. I do not have
to accept this !!!

>Well, unless you patch LoadSeg & C. that's the only way to do it, even with WarpOS.

Exactly, and this is why I did not like ppc.library back then... at the start it did
NOT have such a patch.

> Programs using PowerUP could not directly - at that time, later there was a
> > LoadSeg-Patch - load AmigaOS Executables. Certain people even wanted to get
> > "rid of Shared Libraries in favour of ELF Objects, as the Amiga Shared Library > design is outdated".

> That makes sense indeed, although I'd not get rid of the old system altogether. A mixture of both would be really welcome. After all, if
> I'm not mistaken, AOS4 will have it, athough one-way only (ie, user->library and not also user<-library).

Exactly my point - not getting rid of the old system altogether. And it is not needed
either.

> As for the rest of your topic, Steffen, try to calm down a bit: you behave exactly like the ones you blame. Show more professionalism,
> for <your deity>'s sake!

No I don't. I did not call someone an incompetent for example. Is it only me
or is it no widely accepted that you can wildly insult people (anonymously,
of course) on the internet. Wasn't there such a thing which is called
"nettiquette" ?

Do at least TRY to see the difference between discussion and insulting.

Steffen Haeuser
Jump...
#28 JoannaK #30 Fabio Alemagna
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 28JoannaK18-Dec-2002 20:13 GMT
Comment 29Johan Rönnblom18-Dec-2002 20:24 GMT
Comment 30Fabio Alemagna18-Dec-2002 20:28 GMT
Comment 31Keith Blakemore-Noble18-Dec-2002 21:24 GMT
Comment 32Nicolas Sallin18-Dec-2002 22:15 GMT
Comment 33Steffen Haeuser18-Dec-2002 22:50 GMT
Comment 34catohagen18-Dec-2002 22:51 GMT
Comment 35catohagen18-Dec-2002 22:57 GMT
Comment 36Johan Rönnblom18-Dec-2002 23:04 GMT
Comment 37Anonymous18-Dec-2002 23:30 GMT
Comment 38ehaines19-Dec-2002 00:25 GMT
Comment 39amorel19-Dec-2002 03:58 GMT
Comment 40amorel19-Dec-2002 04:15 GMT
Comment 41priest19-Dec-2002 04:30 GMT
Comment 42priest19-Dec-2002 04:33 GMT
Comment 43JoannaK19-Dec-2002 06:53 GMT
Comment 44priest19-Dec-2002 07:33 GMT
Comment 45Kolbjørn Barmen19-Dec-2002 07:46 GMT
Comment 46Janne Sirén19-Dec-2002 08:40 GMT
Comment 47Emmanuel Lesueur19-Dec-2002 08:55 GMT
Comment 48does it matter19-Dec-2002 11:30 GMT
Comment 49Steffen Haeuser19-Dec-2002 11:33 GMT
Comment 50Fabio Alemagna19-Dec-2002 12:10 GMT
Comment 51MonkeyOS19-Dec-2002 12:17 GMT
Comment 52Fabio Alemagna19-Dec-2002 12:49 GMT
Comment 53Anonymous19-Dec-2002 15:01 GMT
Comment 54Keith Blakemore-Noble19-Dec-2002 19:52 GMT
Comment 55priest20-Dec-2002 10:15 GMT
Back to Top