18-Apr-2024 10:26 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[Rant] Nothing from Amiga Club !!!ANN.lu
Posted on 23-Dec-2002 18:19 GMT by Hyun Koo48 comments
View flat
View list
Hello guys, I have been an Amiga user since 1989 and I have joined the Amiga Club (end of July) to support their initiative. And guess what? Thus far I haven't receive neither the discount coupon nor the t-shirt... It is just me or others in the Amiga community are having this similar problem??? I e-mailed Amiga, but no response thus far...
List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1Darrin23-Dec-2002 17:52 GMT
Comment 2Prang23-Dec-2002 18:42 GMT
Comment 34pLaY23-Dec-2002 18:52 GMT
Comment 4anonymous23-Dec-2002 19:16 GMT
Comment 5darklite23-Dec-2002 19:21 GMT
Comment 6Xeyes23-Dec-2002 19:28 GMT
Comment 7Darrin23-Dec-2002 19:31 GMT
Comment 8Xeyes23-Dec-2002 19:42 GMT
Comment 9Kronos23-Dec-2002 20:04 GMT
Comment 10takemehomegrandma23-Dec-2002 20:29 GMT
Comment 11Darrin23-Dec-2002 20:40 GMT
Comment 12reflect23-Dec-2002 20:48 GMT
Comment 13Joe "Floid" Kanowitz23-Dec-2002 21:04 GMT
Comment 14JoannaK23-Dec-2002 21:46 GMT
Comment 15Darrin23-Dec-2002 22:03 GMT
Comment 16Anonymous23-Dec-2002 22:37 GMT
Comment 173seas23-Dec-2002 23:14 GMT
Comment 18Onetrack23-Dec-2002 23:48 GMT
Comment 19The Slash24-Dec-2002 01:29 GMT
Comment 20JoannaK24-Dec-2002 02:56 GMT
Comment 21Anonymous24-Dec-2002 03:26 GMT
Comment 22Lando24-Dec-2002 03:51 GMT
Comment 23dammy24-Dec-2002 05:32 GMT
Comment 24Wilhelm`24-Dec-2002 05:44 GMT
Comment 25cheesegrate24-Dec-2002 06:32 GMT
Comment 26John Block24-Dec-2002 08:37 GMT
Comment 27Anonymous24-Dec-2002 12:09 GMT
Comment 28ehaines24-Dec-2002 16:04 GMT
Comment 29Nathaniel Downes24-Dec-2002 16:21 GMT
Comment 30ne_one24-Dec-2002 17:47 GMT
Comment 31Gregg24-Dec-2002 17:49 GMT
Comment 32Nate Downes24-Dec-2002 18:18 GMT
Comment 33Mic24-Dec-2002 18:23 GMT
Comment 34Gregg24-Dec-2002 19:30 GMT
Nothing from Amiga Club !!! : Comment 35 of 48ANN.lu
Posted by Nathaniel Downes on 24-Dec-2002 21:06 GMT
In reply to Comment 34 (Gregg):
The thing is, the original AOS4.0 as presented would have taken only 8-months to do. Much like MacOS, rather than re-impliment everything into PPC, just incorporate the entire OS on top of an emulator built into a new kernel that runs under Exec. Then, over time, replace the components. Their need to add new features and move more code to PPC than needs to be, new library and IPC systems, etc. is the root of the problem. MorphOS actually took the former approach, using the Amiga's own ROM on Alphas and early Beta's. Now they've re-implimented everything, and you've got a solid OS w/ a bright future beyond the classic Amiga market. By moving the kernel to underneath Exec, you can add things like memory protection and thread support without a serious re-write.
Hyperion, for all of their good intentions, took a much more difficult approach. I see a comparison to the various BeOS projects here. OpenBeOS uses the actual beOS and is replacing modules one-at-a-time while most of the others are hacking a non-Be-like kernel to emulate, basically doing whole-paper approach.
Of course, Hyperion could pull it off, and create a great OS. But the time needed does not justify the effort put into it and schism to the community. Imagine how we would be if the AOS4 team was put to MorphOS, to develop the ABox. We would have had this a good 6 months ago, and been well underway to the Q-Box, which is the more exciting prospect in my opinion.
We don't need 100% compatability. Even AOS wasn't 100% compatable with previous revisions. Think how many apps were broken from 1.3 to 2.0 or even more recently, how many apps don't handle 3.9 without throwing a tantrum. MorphOS settled for 90% compatability, and got it. It's the last 10%, the undocumented, unorthodox or plain strange API's that are the issue no matter what you're emulating. I feel that Hyperion is being too strict, and it will cause some serious delays yet to come.
Jump...
#36 DDJ #39 Multiview
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 36DDJ24-Dec-2002 21:26 GMT
Comment 37Anonymous24-Dec-2002 22:45 GMT
Comment 38Anonymous24-Dec-2002 23:38 GMT
Comment 39Multiview25-Dec-2002 01:06 GMT
Comment 40Nacho25-Dec-2002 08:59 GMT
Comment 41Anonymous25-Dec-2002 14:28 GMT
Comment 42Frans25-Dec-2002 15:25 GMT
Comment 43marktime26-Dec-2002 01:27 GMT
Comment 44JoannaK26-Dec-2002 04:02 GMT
Comment 45Nathaniel Downes26-Dec-2002 19:06 GMT
Comment 46Skyraker28-Dec-2002 22:45 GMT
Comment 47bill mcgonad31-Dec-2002 10:03 GMT
Comment 48toby goodhead31-Dec-2002 10:06 GMT
Back to Top