18-Apr-2024 19:49 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[Forum] Serious bug in IBrowse 2.3ANN.lu
Posted on 03-Feb-2003 22:33 GMT by catohagen69 comments
View flat
View list
IBrowse 2.3 falsely claims MorphOS system is using AmigaOS.
Particularily misleading since MorphOS systems are reported as running AmigaOS 4.0 !!.

There exists a crude hack that just replace all "AmigaOS" strings with "MorphOS", and
"3.1", "3.5" and "3.9" with "1.1" or "1.2". Better solution should be provided by the IBrowse authors.

List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1Xeyes03-Feb-2003 21:41 GMT
Comment 2catohagen03-Feb-2003 21:43 GMT
Comment 3catohagen03-Feb-2003 21:51 GMT
Comment 4Alkis Tsapanidis03-Feb-2003 21:59 GMT
Comment 5Argh03-Feb-2003 22:21 GMT
Comment 6the man in the shadows03-Feb-2003 22:34 GMT
Comment 7Ryu03-Feb-2003 23:59 GMT
Comment 8Linus G04-Feb-2003 00:11 GMT
Comment 9Anonymous04-Feb-2003 00:14 GMT
Comment 10gary_c04-Feb-2003 00:20 GMT
Comment 11gary_c04-Feb-2003 00:37 GMT
Comment 12the man in the shadows04-Feb-2003 01:32 GMT
Comment 13Anonymous04-Feb-2003 01:32 GMT
Serious bug in IBrowse 2.3 : Comment 14 of 69ANN.lu
Posted by [JC] on 04-Feb-2003 02:11 GMT
Here is my view on all this.

If making an OS run apps at API level from a completely different OS was so grey area, Microsoft would've sued the authors of WINE by now several times over. Microsoft is even more against competing products than AInc is, and has more money and a better team of lawyers to hunt such things down.

It is not illegal to clone an API/ABI, and this is all MorphOS has to do to make Amiga apps run under it. Hell, with a 68K emulator and a suitable API/ABI layer, you could make Amiga apps run under Windows, MacOS or any other OS you like - as long as the API/ABI layer makes it appear to the app that it is running on AmigaOS (this only applies for OS-Legal apps obviously and not ones that hit the hardware).

The only reason Amiga Inc/Hyperion/Blind followers of the above spread such FUD about MorphOS is because it is serious competition to AmigaOS4, it is available now, and is getting a good following. Notice they do not spread such FUD against AROS... the only reason they do not do so is because they can take (steal?) bits from AROS for use in AmigaOS4.

As per usual, standard disclaimer: my opinions written here are my own and not neccesarily those of my employer e.p.i.c interactive gmbh.
Jump...
#25 Anonymous #30 Cyberwlf #53 Jupp3
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 15gary_c04-Feb-2003 02:40 GMT
Comment 16Hooligan/DCS04-Feb-2003 03:26 GMT
Comment 17bbrv04-Feb-2003 03:31 GMT
Comment 18gary_c04-Feb-2003 04:53 GMT
Comment 19catohagen04-Feb-2003 06:40 GMT
Comment 20Senex04-Feb-2003 07:04 GMT
Comment 21bbrv04-Feb-2003 07:12 GMT
Comment 22Anonymous04-Feb-2003 07:13 GMT
Comment 23Ben Yoris04-Feb-2003 07:19 GMT
Comment 24Senex04-Feb-2003 07:23 GMT
Comment 25Anonymous04-Feb-2003 07:39 GMT
Comment 26catohagen04-Feb-2003 07:44 GMT
Comment 27catohagen04-Feb-2003 07:58 GMT
Comment 28priest04-Feb-2003 08:39 GMT
Comment 29Not a Eyetech Fan04-Feb-2003 09:00 GMT
Comment 30Cyberwlf04-Feb-2003 09:12 GMT
Comment 31Anonymous04-Feb-2003 09:16 GMT
Comment 32catohagen04-Feb-2003 09:25 GMT
Comment 33Alkis Tsapanidis04-Feb-2003 10:45 GMT
Comment 34mahen04-Feb-2003 10:51 GMT
Comment 35mahen04-Feb-2003 10:58 GMT
Comment 36Alkis Tsapanidis04-Feb-2003 10:59 GMT
Comment 37catohagen04-Feb-2003 11:12 GMT
Comment 38Alkis Tsapanidis04-Feb-2003 11:17 GMT
Comment 39David Scheibler04-Feb-2003 11:18 GMT
Comment 40Johan Rönnblom04-Feb-2003 12:04 GMT
Comment 41joe04-Feb-2003 12:07 GMT
Comment 42Sigbjørn Skjæret04-Feb-2003 12:39 GMT
Comment 43tired04-Feb-2003 12:57 GMT
Comment 44logain04-Feb-2003 13:02 GMT
Comment 45Alfred Schwarz04-Feb-2003 13:22 GMT
Comment 46logain04-Feb-2003 13:33 GMT
Comment 47Anonymous04-Feb-2003 13:36 GMT
Comment 48krize04-Feb-2003 13:44 GMT
Comment 49JoannaK04-Feb-2003 14:10 GMT
Comment 50Anonymous04-Feb-2003 14:17 GMT
Comment 51Anonymous04-Feb-2003 14:24 GMT
Comment 52pixie04-Feb-2003 14:38 GMT
Comment 53Jupp304-Feb-2003 14:58 GMT
Comment 54cheesegrate04-Feb-2003 15:06 GMT
Comment 55Alkis Tsapanidis04-Feb-2003 16:49 GMT
Comment 56Elwood04-Feb-2003 19:17 GMT
Comment 57AnonX04-Feb-2003 21:12 GMT
Comment 58Anonymous04-Feb-2003 22:35 GMT
Comment 59gary_c05-Feb-2003 00:12 GMT
Comment 60Kolbjørn Barmen05-Feb-2003 00:32 GMT
Comment 61joe05-Feb-2003 11:26 GMT
Comment 62pixie05-Feb-2003 13:43 GMT
Comment 63pixie05-Feb-2003 13:46 GMT
Comment 64pixie05-Feb-2003 13:54 GMT
Comment 65pixie05-Feb-2003 14:03 GMT
Comment 66itix05-Feb-2003 16:30 GMT
Comment 67Alkis Tsapanidis06-Feb-2003 10:43 GMT
Comment 68Anonymous06-Feb-2003 23:41 GMT
Comment 69Ketzer11-Feb-2003 08:16 GMT
Back to Top