19-Apr-2024 18:56 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[News] Amiga-News.de interviewing Ben HermansANN.lu
Posted on 19-Feb-2003 22:38 GMT by Whatever (Edited on 2003-02-20 14:16:56 GMT by Christophe Decanini)86 comments
View flat
View list
Amiga-News.de have interviewed Ben Hermans. Read the complete interview here.
List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1Emeric SH19-Feb-2003 21:52 GMT
Comment 2Marcus Sundman19-Feb-2003 22:01 GMT
Comment 3Jack Me19-Feb-2003 22:24 GMT
Comment 4SlimJim19-Feb-2003 22:30 GMT
Comment 5JoannaK19-Feb-2003 22:40 GMT
Comment 6Lando19-Feb-2003 23:01 GMT
Comment 7Ben Hermans/Hyperion19-Feb-2003 23:09 GMT
Comment 8takemehomegrandma19-Feb-2003 23:22 GMT
Comment 9AmiTroll19-Feb-2003 23:39 GMT
Comment 10Anonymous19-Feb-2003 23:53 GMT
Comment 11SqMonk20-Feb-2003 00:12 GMT
Comment 12Anonymous20-Feb-2003 00:20 GMT
Comment 13Xeyes20-Feb-2003 02:01 GMT
Comment 14Anonymous20-Feb-2003 04:26 GMT
Comment 15Dan Boyd20-Feb-2003 06:54 GMT
Comment 16Atheist220-Feb-2003 07:21 GMT
Comment 17Atheist220-Feb-2003 07:23 GMT
Comment 18Kjetil20-Feb-2003 08:26 GMT
Comment 19Sam Smith20-Feb-2003 08:48 GMT
Comment 20Sam Smith20-Feb-2003 08:49 GMT
Comment 21Alex Klauke20-Feb-2003 09:17 GMT
Comment 22EmGee20-Feb-2003 09:17 GMT
Amiga-News.de interviewing Ben Hermans : Comment 23 of 86ANN.lu
Posted by takemehomegrandma on 20-Feb-2003 09:21 GMT
In reply to Comment 11 (SqMonk):
> Why would "anybody" do that? Since this wouldn't stop the development of
> Amiga OS, Hyperium would still have the right to code Amiga and
> that "somebody else", with the Amiga name, would be sued for copyright
> infringement for using it as the name of unrelated code.

> There are many similar UNIX OSs but they don't try to steal each other's
> name. Just because MorphOs has a similar gui, doesn't mean it should have the
> Amiga name. I'm not sure why some people are obsessed with this.

As Xeyes said, you're mixing copyright up with trademarks. And it was only a hypothetical question (not an obsession); if Hyperion has an exclusive right to develop AmigaOS4.x, and a *legally new owner* of the "Amiga" brand chooses another path to go regarding the OS and to call that "AmigaOS 5.x", in which position will Hyperion find themselves then with their OS4?

AFAIR, Hyperions rights are limited to OS4.x, and Amiga Inc have said that *they* will develop OS5 themselves, inhouse (but I don't know if I remember this correctly). And besides, Amiga Inc has allready proven that you can call just about anything "Amiga", even products that hasn't got the slightest connection to Amiga whatsoever ...
Jump...
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 24Anonymous20-Feb-2003 09:25 GMT
Comment 25Don Cox20-Feb-2003 09:47 GMT
Comment 26John Block20-Feb-2003 09:56 GMT
Comment 27Ben Hermans/Hyperion20-Feb-2003 10:25 GMT
Comment 28JoannaK20-Feb-2003 11:24 GMT
Comment 29Eva20-Feb-2003 11:48 GMT
Comment 30Alex Klauke20-Feb-2003 11:49 GMT
Comment 31Anomy20-Feb-2003 12:03 GMT
Comment 32anti-eva20-Feb-2003 12:24 GMT
Comment 33takemehomegrandma20-Feb-2003 12:44 GMT
Comment 34SlimJim20-Feb-2003 12:54 GMT
Comment 35Anony20-Feb-2003 13:25 GMT
Comment 36SlimJim20-Feb-2003 14:28 GMT
Comment 37Christoph Gutjahr20-Feb-2003 14:49 GMT
Comment 38priest20-Feb-2003 15:00 GMT
Comment 39priest20-Feb-2003 15:03 GMT
Comment 40priest20-Feb-2003 15:06 GMT
Comment 41MarkTime20-Feb-2003 15:18 GMT
Comment 42dirigent20-Feb-2003 15:40 GMT
Comment 43mahen20-Feb-2003 16:10 GMT
Comment 44Graham20-Feb-2003 17:03 GMT
Comment 45TimeWillTell20-Feb-2003 17:05 GMT
Comment 46Richi20-Feb-2003 17:30 GMT
Comment 47anonymous20-Feb-2003 17:32 GMT
Comment 48mahen20-Feb-2003 17:48 GMT
Comment 49Dan Andersson20-Feb-2003 18:16 GMT
Comment 50TimeWillTell20-Feb-2003 18:31 GMT
Comment 51Gregg20-Feb-2003 18:50 GMT
Comment 52Atheist220-Feb-2003 19:05 GMT
Comment 53Rimmer20-Feb-2003 19:12 GMT
Comment 54Turrican20-Feb-2003 19:20 GMT
Comment 55TimeWillTell20-Feb-2003 19:31 GMT
Comment 56greenboy20-Feb-2003 19:34 GMT
Comment 57Hans-Joerg Frieden20-Feb-2003 19:52 GMT
Comment 58TimeWillTell20-Feb-2003 19:57 GMT
Comment 59Don Cox20-Feb-2003 20:19 GMT
Comment 60Don Cox20-Feb-2003 20:23 GMT
Comment 61mahen20-Feb-2003 20:56 GMT
Comment 62Alex Klauke20-Feb-2003 21:15 GMT
Comment 63Dan Andersson20-Feb-2003 21:51 GMT
Comment 64Warren20-Feb-2003 23:39 GMT
Comment 65Daniel Miller21-Feb-2003 01:13 GMT
Comment 66Anonymous21-Feb-2003 01:29 GMT
Comment 67priest21-Feb-2003 06:08 GMT
Comment 68Anonymous21-Feb-2003 07:37 GMT
Comment 69Anonymous21-Feb-2003 07:44 GMT
Comment 70Keith Blakemore-Noble21-Feb-2003 07:56 GMT
Comment 71Don Cox21-Feb-2003 09:07 GMT
Comment 72Don Cox21-Feb-2003 09:12 GMT
Comment 73Ben Hermans/Hyperion21-Feb-2003 09:56 GMT
Comment 74Alkis Tsapanidis21-Feb-2003 12:18 GMT
Comment 75Ben Hermans/Hyperion21-Feb-2003 12:31 GMT
Comment 76Ketzer21-Feb-2003 12:39 GMT
Comment 77Alkis Tsapanidis21-Feb-2003 15:04 GMT
Comment 78Alkis Tsapanidis21-Feb-2003 15:06 GMT
Comment 79Anonymous21-Feb-2003 15:34 GMT
Comment 80Ben Hermans/Hyperion21-Feb-2003 15:58 GMT
Comment 81Alex Klauke21-Feb-2003 16:33 GMT
Comment 82TimeWillTell21-Feb-2003 17:50 GMT
Comment 83Sam Smith21-Feb-2003 18:07 GMT
Comment 84Kronos21-Feb-2003 19:21 GMT
Comment 85Daniel Miller22-Feb-2003 10:06 GMT
Comment 86Daniel Miller22-Feb-2003 10:29 GMT
Back to Top