20-Apr-2024 07:10 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[News] Amiga-News.de interviewing Ben HermansANN.lu
Posted on 19-Feb-2003 22:38 GMT by Whatever (Edited on 2003-02-20 14:16:56 GMT by Christophe Decanini)86 comments
View flat
View list
Amiga-News.de have interviewed Ben Hermans. Read the complete interview here.
List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1Emeric SH19-Feb-2003 21:52 GMT
Comment 2Marcus Sundman19-Feb-2003 22:01 GMT
Comment 3Jack Me19-Feb-2003 22:24 GMT
Comment 4SlimJim19-Feb-2003 22:30 GMT
Comment 5JoannaK19-Feb-2003 22:40 GMT
Comment 6Lando19-Feb-2003 23:01 GMT
Comment 7Ben Hermans/Hyperion19-Feb-2003 23:09 GMT
Comment 8takemehomegrandma19-Feb-2003 23:22 GMT
Comment 9AmiTroll19-Feb-2003 23:39 GMT
Comment 10Anonymous19-Feb-2003 23:53 GMT
Comment 11SqMonk20-Feb-2003 00:12 GMT
Comment 12Anonymous20-Feb-2003 00:20 GMT
Comment 13Xeyes20-Feb-2003 02:01 GMT
Comment 14Anonymous20-Feb-2003 04:26 GMT
Comment 15Dan Boyd20-Feb-2003 06:54 GMT
Comment 16Atheist220-Feb-2003 07:21 GMT
Comment 17Atheist220-Feb-2003 07:23 GMT
Comment 18Kjetil20-Feb-2003 08:26 GMT
Comment 19Sam Smith20-Feb-2003 08:48 GMT
Comment 20Sam Smith20-Feb-2003 08:49 GMT
Comment 21Alex Klauke20-Feb-2003 09:17 GMT
Comment 22EmGee20-Feb-2003 09:17 GMT
Comment 23takemehomegrandma20-Feb-2003 09:21 GMT
Comment 24Anonymous20-Feb-2003 09:25 GMT
Comment 25Don Cox20-Feb-2003 09:47 GMT
Comment 26John Block20-Feb-2003 09:56 GMT
Comment 27Ben Hermans/Hyperion20-Feb-2003 10:25 GMT
Comment 28JoannaK20-Feb-2003 11:24 GMT
Comment 29Eva20-Feb-2003 11:48 GMT
Amiga-News.de interviewing Ben Hermans : Comment 30 of 86ANN.lu
Posted by Alex Klauke on 20-Feb-2003 11:49 GMT
In reply to Comment 27 (Ben Hermans/Hyperion):
Hello Ben.

> As far as I understand the word "feature freeze", it means that no further
> features are planned or introduced in an effort to avoid the dreaded "feature
> creep".

No other meaning here. Features are specified and fixed/freezed, then the
implementation starts (at latest) and once it is developed to a high degree,
beta testing of the final system can start (or even earlier for already finished
modules). That's what happened for Amiga OS 4.0 as I gather.

What this can mean though is that the actual implementation of a feature
(graphics chipset support in the case of SNAP) may change on the way.
So I see no feature change here but a change of implementation. As long as
it does not add much time to the 'deadline' (if at all) and even highly improves
the future possibilities of AmigaOS4 with regard to fast adaption to new
graphics chipsets, this is simply just 'A Good Thing'(tm) 8-)
(when was the last time we were even near the leading edge of graphics
chipsets?)

> OTOH, it should be clear that after working for over 15 months with a team of > around 30 developers, we already have a nice wishlist for OS 4.1.

I hope you give us some clue of it soon after 4.0 is shipping? Can't wait ;-)
Anyway my schedule is AmigaOne first, 4.0 thereafter, then I'll be a happy
camper whatever comes next.. :-)

> The OS 4 dev team is a bunch of hardworking, dedicated individuals who want
> to see AmigaOS thrive.

Which is highly appreciated. (cannot be repeated enough.. ;-)

Ciao, Alex

in Reply to anonymous (comment 24):

> InstallerNG

I regard it not actually a change of the feature set if one feature is omitted
from the release until finished. And it isn't so that the InstallerNG will never
appear for OS 4(.0). Its implementation is pending, its not cut off the feature
list. Big difference! :)
Jump...
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 31Anomy20-Feb-2003 12:03 GMT
Comment 32anti-eva20-Feb-2003 12:24 GMT
Comment 33takemehomegrandma20-Feb-2003 12:44 GMT
Comment 34SlimJim20-Feb-2003 12:54 GMT
Comment 35Anony20-Feb-2003 13:25 GMT
Comment 36SlimJim20-Feb-2003 14:28 GMT
Comment 37Christoph Gutjahr20-Feb-2003 14:49 GMT
Comment 38priest20-Feb-2003 15:00 GMT
Comment 39priest20-Feb-2003 15:03 GMT
Comment 40priest20-Feb-2003 15:06 GMT
Comment 41MarkTime20-Feb-2003 15:18 GMT
Comment 42dirigent20-Feb-2003 15:40 GMT
Comment 43mahen20-Feb-2003 16:10 GMT
Comment 44Graham20-Feb-2003 17:03 GMT
Comment 45TimeWillTell20-Feb-2003 17:05 GMT
Comment 46Richi20-Feb-2003 17:30 GMT
Comment 47anonymous20-Feb-2003 17:32 GMT
Comment 48mahen20-Feb-2003 17:48 GMT
Comment 49Dan Andersson20-Feb-2003 18:16 GMT
Comment 50TimeWillTell20-Feb-2003 18:31 GMT
Comment 51Gregg20-Feb-2003 18:50 GMT
Comment 52Atheist220-Feb-2003 19:05 GMT
Comment 53Rimmer20-Feb-2003 19:12 GMT
Comment 54Turrican20-Feb-2003 19:20 GMT
Comment 55TimeWillTell20-Feb-2003 19:31 GMT
Comment 56greenboy20-Feb-2003 19:34 GMT
Comment 57Hans-Joerg Frieden20-Feb-2003 19:52 GMT
Comment 58TimeWillTell20-Feb-2003 19:57 GMT
Comment 59Don Cox20-Feb-2003 20:19 GMT
Comment 60Don Cox20-Feb-2003 20:23 GMT
Comment 61mahen20-Feb-2003 20:56 GMT
Comment 62Alex Klauke20-Feb-2003 21:15 GMT
Comment 63Dan Andersson20-Feb-2003 21:51 GMT
Comment 64Warren20-Feb-2003 23:39 GMT
Comment 65Daniel Miller21-Feb-2003 01:13 GMT
Comment 66Anonymous21-Feb-2003 01:29 GMT
Comment 67priest21-Feb-2003 06:08 GMT
Comment 68Anonymous21-Feb-2003 07:37 GMT
Comment 69Anonymous21-Feb-2003 07:44 GMT
Comment 70Keith Blakemore-Noble21-Feb-2003 07:56 GMT
Comment 71Don Cox21-Feb-2003 09:07 GMT
Comment 72Don Cox21-Feb-2003 09:12 GMT
Comment 73Ben Hermans/Hyperion21-Feb-2003 09:56 GMT
Comment 74Alkis Tsapanidis21-Feb-2003 12:18 GMT
Comment 75Ben Hermans/Hyperion21-Feb-2003 12:31 GMT
Comment 76Ketzer21-Feb-2003 12:39 GMT
Comment 77Alkis Tsapanidis21-Feb-2003 15:04 GMT
Comment 78Alkis Tsapanidis21-Feb-2003 15:06 GMT
Comment 79Anonymous21-Feb-2003 15:34 GMT
Comment 80Ben Hermans/Hyperion21-Feb-2003 15:58 GMT
Comment 81Alex Klauke21-Feb-2003 16:33 GMT
Comment 82TimeWillTell21-Feb-2003 17:50 GMT
Comment 83Sam Smith21-Feb-2003 18:07 GMT
Comment 84Kronos21-Feb-2003 19:21 GMT
Comment 85Daniel Miller22-Feb-2003 10:06 GMT
Comment 86Daniel Miller22-Feb-2003 10:29 GMT
Back to Top