| [News] Pegasos to go on sale on Monday - Pegasos II to be available in September 2003 | ANN.lu |
| Posted on 21-Feb-2003 19:45 GMT by Senex | 318 comments
View flat
View list |
As Genesi announces on MorphOS-News.de, the next Pegasos-I-boards will go on sale on Monday:
To Whom it May Concern:
The Pegasos will go on sale Monday.
There are 300 to sell and 100 that will go to MorphOS Developers and Employees.
If interested to purchase a Pegasos mainboard or fully configured machine:
1. Contact your Distributor
2. Contact Phoenix
3. Contact Genesi
When these are sold there will not be another release until August/September 2003. The next release, the Pegasos II, will have double data rates, three 1 Gb/s ethernet channels, and Dual G4s. Genesi will not release a new version until then.
We want everyone to understand this before they purchase the Pegasos available now. All Betatester boards will be exchanged with the first priority.
An upgrade credit will be offered to Pegasos I buyers. The Pegasos I will not have a G4 upgrade.
Thank you and best regards,
Genesi
Note: Please contact Genesi directly to get your replacement board with April chipset (if you haven't done so far). Thank you.
|
|
| List of all comments to this article |
| Pegasos to go on sale on Monday - Pegasos II to be available in September 2003 : Comment 249 of 318 | ANN.lu |
| Posted by Anonymous on 22-Feb-2003 15:32 GMT | In reply to Comment 229 (Nicolas Sallin):
>If you are talking about SMP where you need a new API for nearly
>everything and where only new applications can use it (eventually),
>then yes you can hack it in an AmigaOS.
Could you please list the APIs that needs to be improved? You seem to
'know' alot of things but you don't back it up. At least, if you posted
some backing up, we'd kill these kind of threads once and for all. But
to be honest, I don't think you you can. Why not? Well, if you could,
you would have posted your facts long time ago, wouldn't you? And by
saing that old time C= people sais it is not possible is not a fact.
Alot of great things have been created out of the fact that someone
said it was impossible and someone else showed the world the opposite.
>If you want to add hacks and make wrong design choices, then yes you
>can put a lof of "features" in an AmigaOS.
If that is the case, why argue this at all? Why would MorphOs implement
the ABox then after all? Why not implement a posix box instead and get
so many more apps running instead? Why all these anounces of software
ported over to the MorphOs/ABox sandbox? Wouldn't it make alot more
sence port the stuff over to Quark then?
>If you want to end where MacOS9 and WindowsMe are, then yes you can
>do it.
A little reality check here... MFC, Win32 etc. are all API's available
ind WinME and WinXP, but I still doesn't see why this would make WinME
a dead end? I mean, how many apps are WinME only and cannot be run on
WinXP? The windows system / kernel stopped beeing a problem long time
ago for every day apps. It is the _system_ that is the dead end. (Such
as security, filesystems, drivers etc.) But really, how many apps
take damage from that???
>Some others people prefer to think twice and make sensible choices,
>instead of filling featurelist with elements they *know* as broken.
For us who doesn't know they are broke, could you please enlighten
us and tell us how?
...
>Good luck and please stop implying your direct competitor is using
>stollen sources while you perfectly know it's a plain lie.
How do you know that he knows it is a lie??? There are facts around
that you don't know about which would make people belive things
different than you. But I have never seen you admit that the world
may not be exactly like you think it is.
>By the way, everybody is still waiting for your *public* excuses on
>this subject.
What if I told you that a certain person I know once asked Ralph for
held on a certain AmigaOS question? What if I told you that part of
the responce was a dcc'ed file which beared the C= headers and was
documented as beeing a part of the OS3.x sources? (And no, it was _not_
just a header file or an example file from the NDK) |
|
| List of all comments to this article (continued) |
|
- User Menu
-
- About ANN archives
- The ANN archives is powered by #AmigaZeux. It was updated daily (news last: 22-Oct-2004; comments last: 18-May-2005).
ANN.lu was created, previously owned and maintained by Christian Kemp, www.ckemp.com.
- Contribute
- Not possible at this time!
- Search ANN archives
- Advanced search
- Hosting
- ANN.lu was hosted by Dreamhost. Sign up through this link, mention "ckemp" as referrer and he will get a 10% commission on any account you purchase.
Please show your appreciation for any past, present and future work on ANN.lu by making a contribution via PayPal.
|
