24-Apr-2024 07:33 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[News] Eyetech talks about TerrasoftANN.lu
Posted on 12-Mar-2003 05:59 GMT by Christian Kemp (Edited on 2003-03-12 08:46:13 GMT by Christian Kemp)146 comments
View flat
View list
An anonymous reader links to this message by Alan Redhouse talking about Terrasoft, a possible 1.3Ghz CPU module, and XE delivery dates.
List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1Christian KempRegistered user12-Mar-2003 06:18 GMT
Comment 2DaveP12-Mar-2003 06:26 GMT
Comment 3DaveP12-Mar-2003 06:30 GMT
Comment 4priest12-Mar-2003 06:36 GMT
Comment 5DaveP12-Mar-2003 06:36 GMT
Comment 6Thomas W12-Mar-2003 06:36 GMT
Comment 7DaveP12-Mar-2003 06:38 GMT
Comment 8Christian KempRegistered user12-Mar-2003 06:39 GMT
Comment 9priest12-Mar-2003 06:41 GMT
Comment 10T_Bone12-Mar-2003 06:41 GMT
Comment 11DaveP12-Mar-2003 06:41 GMT
Comment 12Christian KempRegistered user12-Mar-2003 06:42 GMT
Comment 13Christian KempRegistered user12-Mar-2003 06:43 GMT
Comment 14DaveP12-Mar-2003 06:45 GMT
Comment 15DaveP12-Mar-2003 06:46 GMT
Comment 16DaveP12-Mar-2003 06:47 GMT
Comment 17Christian KempRegistered user12-Mar-2003 06:51 GMT
Comment 18opi12-Mar-2003 06:53 GMT
Comment 19T_Bone12-Mar-2003 06:54 GMT
Comment 20JoannaK12-Mar-2003 07:13 GMT
Comment 21Ferry12-Mar-2003 07:18 GMT
Comment 22DaveP12-Mar-2003 07:27 GMT
Comment 23Remco Komduur12-Mar-2003 07:29 GMT
Comment 24Anonymous12-Mar-2003 07:31 GMT
Comment 25Don Cox12-Mar-2003 07:34 GMT
Comment 26DaveP12-Mar-2003 07:38 GMT
Comment 27takemehomegrandma12-Mar-2003 07:43 GMT
Comment 28Janne Sirén12-Mar-2003 07:45 GMT
Comment 29priest12-Mar-2003 07:56 GMT
Comment 30DaveP12-Mar-2003 07:59 GMT
Comment 31MiniBobF12-Mar-2003 08:07 GMT
Comment 32MiniBobF12-Mar-2003 08:14 GMT
Comment 33takemehomegrandma12-Mar-2003 08:31 GMT
Comment 34Remco Komduur12-Mar-2003 08:49 GMT
Comment 35Peter12-Mar-2003 08:50 GMT
Comment 36Remco Komduur12-Mar-2003 08:54 GMT
Comment 37strobe12-Mar-2003 09:03 GMT
Comment 38Peter12-Mar-2003 09:03 GMT
Comment 39DaveP12-Mar-2003 09:04 GMT
Comment 40strobe12-Mar-2003 09:04 GMT
Comment 41Sonic the hedgehog12-Mar-2003 09:25 GMT
Comment 42Sit Back Friends12-Mar-2003 09:38 GMT
Comment 43Troels E12-Mar-2003 10:01 GMT
Comment 44Ben Hermans/Hyperion12-Mar-2003 10:11 GMT
Comment 45DaveP12-Mar-2003 10:12 GMT
Comment 46Peter Gordon12-Mar-2003 10:14 GMT
Comment 47David Robinson12-Mar-2003 10:28 GMT
Comment 48DaveP12-Mar-2003 10:39 GMT
Comment 49takemehomegrandma12-Mar-2003 10:59 GMT
Comment 50ikez12-Mar-2003 11:04 GMT
Comment 51alan buxey12-Mar-2003 11:33 GMT
Comment 52The big brother12-Mar-2003 11:47 GMT
Comment 53Peter Gordon12-Mar-2003 11:57 GMT
Comment 54takemehomegrandma12-Mar-2003 12:05 GMT
Comment 55Anonymous12-Mar-2003 12:25 GMT
Comment 56Christophe Decanini12-Mar-2003 12:26 GMT
Comment 57DaveP12-Mar-2003 12:28 GMT
Comment 58Troels E12-Mar-2003 12:29 GMT
Comment 59Ole-Egil12-Mar-2003 12:42 GMT
Comment 60gz12-Mar-2003 12:47 GMT
Comment 61takemehomegrandma12-Mar-2003 12:54 GMT
Comment 62Ian Shurmer12-Mar-2003 13:01 GMT
Comment 63Christophe Decanini12-Mar-2003 13:02 GMT
Comment 64Christophe Decanini12-Mar-2003 13:16 GMT
Comment 65DaveP12-Mar-2003 13:26 GMT
Comment 66MarkTime12-Mar-2003 13:27 GMT
Comment 67DaveP12-Mar-2003 13:32 GMT
Comment 68MarkTime12-Mar-2003 13:37 GMT
Comment 69Christophe Decanini12-Mar-2003 13:41 GMT
Comment 70DaveP12-Mar-2003 13:51 GMT
Comment 71MarkTime12-Mar-2003 13:52 GMT
Comment 72Darren Eveland12-Mar-2003 13:56 GMT
Eyetech talks about Terrasoft : Comment 73 of 146ANN.lu
Posted by DaveP on 12-Mar-2003 14:00 GMT
OK risking boss wrath here....

Firstly Ben Hermans does not say that this is recent behaviour. I have been
spoofed many times in the past and had terrible trouble trying to get people
to believe I didn't make such asnine statements like "Pegasos is just a Mac".

Secondly I don't agree that it is a slur on ANN because it is quite frankly
evidenced by the content of the posting of late. Lets look at the accusations
one by one:

#1 Troels post had the point "Its not about the site, its about SOME of the users". Ben
followed up agreeing with that analysis. No where in Bens comment #44 do I see
him making a DIRECT criticism of the site.


#2 Ben said:"Much like Alan has done now, I have in the past expressed concerns about the quality of discussion here and elsewhere. "
He probably has expressed those concerns, but here we see no detail of what those concerns
were apart from "quality of discussion". This could be taken two ways but unfortunately
or Ben the most probably interpretation is the general one - that the quality of
debate in general is shocking. Is this evidenced? Yes and no. Yes in that the quality
posts are drowned in the noise from the trolls, no in that there are few trolls making
lot of noise and often the debate here has a HECK of a lot of quality.

#3 " These endless flamewars, impersonations, silly recriminations, personal insults etc. are very off putting to many users. "
OK, exaggeration "endless", they tend to have a finite life span in my experience. Bad
point is "silly recriminations". They do happen but decribing anything as silly is subjective.
Personal insults? Phew do we get them on ANN!

He does make one fair point that isn't the same as other places that don't allow
it ( like usenet where you can work it out from the header - e.g. SteveG ), the impersonations
one. This has made ANN quite difficult to read, in fact MooBunny also had a spate of
impersonations for a while and that has similar "debate quality" problems but in the main
because it is less popular than ANN it does not come under the same fire. So yes
some of the criticism would also apply to MooBunny but then look up a paragraph
and he sayes "here and elsewhere". Covered, just. Two paragraphs down "This is
nothing to do with ANN".

So I find Bens remarks reasonably fair given the qualifiers he puts in there. ANNs
biggest problem is the background noise from the impersonaters and the swear-kids.

OK so now onto your post.

Phew!
"I have been on the internet since the beginning and I submit that
this is typical discussions. The discussion on comp.sys.amiga.misc
were every bit as animated as on ANN.LU. This is a normal discussion board,
it is not in any way full of 'flamers'. "

Well to be fair I have been a lurker of csam for a LONG time and it is just
as full of flamers as here, and impersonators so I think that you are right
this is typical "internet" fare. However there is no reason why not to strive
for better and as said before on Usenet you can at least identify a spoofer
simply and even better - add them to your killfile ;-)


" This is all codewords for intolerance. I submit Mr. Hermans is very upset
when an opinion doesn't go his way, and I have never heard him once
criticize one of his fans. Its not about 'flaming' its about obtaining
'agreement'. "
Well I hope it isn't codewords for intolerance. I see no reason why we cant
have the debate without the personal references, the impersonations and the
trolling. Like for example debates are in real life when people are faced by
each other. WRT Ben, I have never heard him criticize one of his fans *on here*
although I ask the question - does he have "fans"?
I can't answer the last bit because I am missing a part of your reasoning that
takes us from not being about flaming but about obtaining agreement. Can you supply
more of your train of thought?

"Everyone can form their own opinion....does Mr. Hermans get upset to hear
anti-hyperion talk, even when its civil, or does he get upset about
emotional language even when its in favor of hyperion. "
I would say that everyone can form their own opinions and should, the problem
is a lot of people don't. In chatrooms and on other sites you can see myths
picked up from deliberate distortions on other chat rooms/sites repeated as
verbatim fact.
Second part, I would say that Ben, like every other human being ( e.g. Christian
over ANN ) would get upset over anti-hyperion talk. Everyone in those circumstances
has bias which is why when I read peoples posts I always have a "well they would
react like this" mental checklist. I have read commments ( sickly positive ) that
frankly make we want to puke in the nearest styrofoam cup but what can you say? Its
like whipping a puppy dog that is humping your leg - you both come away feeling
dirtied from the experience.

Finally thanks for the compliment MarkTime. I do try to think things through
before I post and I don't always succeed. I also try not to be biased one
way or another but obviously fail frequently ( see Christophes comments on the
subject ).

If everyone can discuss things civilly, and say Ben Hermans throws a tantrum
then his views will be exposed much more effectively than yours or mine speculation
about his "human" reactions.

TTFN

Dave. ( in trouble )
Jump...
#83 MarkTime
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 74Matt Parsons12-Mar-2003 14:04 GMT
Comment 75Mr Anonymous12-Mar-2003 14:06 GMT
Comment 76DaveP12-Mar-2003 14:07 GMT
Comment 77DaveP12-Mar-2003 14:07 GMT
Comment 78dammy12-Mar-2003 14:21 GMT
Comment 79dammy12-Mar-2003 14:23 GMT
Comment 80Remco Komduur12-Mar-2003 14:26 GMT
Comment 81Ian Shurmer12-Mar-2003 14:28 GMT
Comment 82Christophe Decanini12-Mar-2003 14:47 GMT
Comment 83MarkTime12-Mar-2003 14:51 GMT
Comment 84DaveP12-Mar-2003 14:51 GMT
Comment 85hgm12-Mar-2003 14:57 GMT
Comment 86Christophe Decanini12-Mar-2003 14:58 GMT
Comment 87anonymous12-Mar-2003 15:04 GMT
Comment 88Anonymous12-Mar-2003 15:46 GMT
Comment 89Ben Hermans/Hyperion12-Mar-2003 16:30 GMT
Comment 90MIKE12-Mar-2003 16:48 GMT
Comment 91Ben Hermans/Hyperion12-Mar-2003 16:58 GMT
Comment 92Anonymous12-Mar-2003 17:44 GMT
Comment 93Christophe Decanini12-Mar-2003 18:30 GMT
Comment 94Remco Komduur12-Mar-2003 18:31 GMT
Comment 95Alkis Tsapanidis12-Mar-2003 19:06 GMT
Comment 96Paul Mellor12-Mar-2003 19:23 GMT
Comment 97Alkis Tsapanidis12-Mar-2003 19:25 GMT
Comment 98Ketzer12-Mar-2003 20:07 GMT
Comment 99hammer12-Mar-2003 21:59 GMT
Comment 100hammer12-Mar-2003 22:15 GMT
Comment 101Graham13-Mar-2003 00:43 GMT
Comment 102Anonymous13-Mar-2003 02:06 GMT
Comment 103Anonymous13-Mar-2003 02:09 GMT
Comment 104Anonymous13-Mar-2003 02:15 GMT
Comment 105ehaines13-Mar-2003 02:55 GMT
Comment 106Anonymous13-Mar-2003 02:57 GMT
Comment 107Anonymous13-Mar-2003 03:08 GMT
Comment 108Anonymous13-Mar-2003 03:18 GMT
Comment 109Anonymous13-Mar-2003 03:23 GMT
Comment 110Anonymous13-Mar-2003 03:35 GMT
Comment 111Clive inverdale13-Mar-2003 05:20 GMT
Comment 112Ole-Egil13-Mar-2003 06:21 GMT
Comment 113Ole-Egil13-Mar-2003 06:30 GMT
Comment 114SlimJim13-Mar-2003 07:04 GMT
Comment 115SiTH13-Mar-2003 07:10 GMT
Comment 116priest13-Mar-2003 07:25 GMT
Comment 117Don Cox13-Mar-2003 07:25 GMT
Comment 118Ole-Egil13-Mar-2003 07:46 GMT
Comment 119DaveP13-Mar-2003 07:47 GMT
Comment 120Peter Gordon13-Mar-2003 09:14 GMT
Comment 121Alkis Tsapanidis13-Mar-2003 11:33 GMT
Comment 122Alkis Tsapanidis13-Mar-2003 11:36 GMT
Comment 123Alkis Tsapanidis13-Mar-2003 11:38 GMT
Comment 124Alkis Tsapanidis13-Mar-2003 11:39 GMT
Comment 125Bible Reader13-Mar-2003 12:11 GMT
Comment 126DaveP13-Mar-2003 12:18 GMT
Comment 127Anonymous13-Mar-2003 13:18 GMT
Comment 128SlimJim13-Mar-2003 13:31 GMT
Comment 129ehaines13-Mar-2003 13:34 GMT
Comment 130priest13-Mar-2003 13:38 GMT
Comment 131Christophe Decanini13-Mar-2003 14:53 GMT
Comment 132dammy13-Mar-2003 15:00 GMT
Comment 133Janne Sirén13-Mar-2003 16:34 GMT
Comment 134Loki13-Mar-2003 18:15 GMT
Comment 135takemehomegrandma13-Mar-2003 19:28 GMT
Comment 136ehaines13-Mar-2003 19:47 GMT
Comment 137Alkis Tsapanidis13-Mar-2003 21:04 GMT
Comment 138Alkis Tsapanidis13-Mar-2003 21:07 GMT
Comment 139Anonymous13-Mar-2003 22:36 GMT
Comment 140priest14-Mar-2003 04:36 GMT
Comment 141priest14-Mar-2003 04:39 GMT
Comment 142priest14-Mar-2003 04:50 GMT
Comment 143dammy14-Mar-2003 05:02 GMT
Comment 144Janne Sirén14-Mar-2003 06:31 GMT
Comment 145Abuse14-Mar-2003 14:48 GMT
Comment 146SlimJim14-Mar-2003 19:53 GMT
Back to Top