29-Mar-2024 01:41 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[News] Ten Answers with Fleecy Moss!ANN.lu
Posted on 15-Mar-2003 16:43 GMT by MIB155 comments
View flat
View list
8 Days ahead of schedule! The first ever Q&A With Fleecy Moss is now available over at AmigaWorld.net
List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1cheesegrate15-Mar-2003 15:56 GMT
Comment 2cheesegrate15-Mar-2003 15:57 GMT
Comment 3DaveP15-Mar-2003 16:03 GMT
Comment 4The_Editor15-Mar-2003 16:08 GMT
Comment 5catohagen15-Mar-2003 16:13 GMT
Comment 6cheesegrate15-Mar-2003 16:22 GMT
Comment 7chillout15-Mar-2003 16:24 GMT
Comment 8DaveP15-Mar-2003 16:29 GMT
Comment 9cheesegrate15-Mar-2003 16:34 GMT
Comment 10DaveP15-Mar-2003 16:36 GMT
Comment 11cheesegrate15-Mar-2003 16:36 GMT
Comment 12DaveP15-Mar-2003 16:39 GMT
Comment 13Not a Worshipper15-Mar-2003 16:41 GMT
Comment 14SlimJim15-Mar-2003 16:42 GMT
Comment 15mahen15-Mar-2003 16:44 GMT
Comment 16SlimJim15-Mar-2003 16:47 GMT
Comment 17catohagen15-Mar-2003 16:55 GMT
Comment 18cheesegrate15-Mar-2003 16:56 GMT
Comment 19(cheesegrates mum) Mrs Ceremuga15-Mar-2003 16:58 GMT
Comment 20Question Man15-Mar-2003 16:59 GMT
Comment 21Not a Worshipper15-Mar-2003 17:09 GMT
Comment 22Ole-Egil15-Mar-2003 18:03 GMT
Comment 23Anonymous15-Mar-2003 18:32 GMT
Comment 24Anonymous15-Mar-2003 18:44 GMT
Comment 25KenH15-Mar-2003 18:50 GMT
Comment 26Anonymous15-Mar-2003 19:35 GMT
Comment 27Rimmer15-Mar-2003 21:01 GMT
Ten Answers with Fleecy Moss! : Comment 28 of 155ANN.lu
Posted by MuLTiViEW on 15-Mar-2003 21:27 GMT
To Flea-cy Moss.

I just read your Bulls@#$t answers to those questions on AmigaWorld.net.

I'd like to take the time to repond to one that was asked....

> QUESTION:
> 3) Herewegoagain: "Will they [Amiga Inc.] be negotiating with Microsoft to
> bring Internet Explorer, Outlook Express and Media Player to OS4?".

> ANSWER:
> Fleecy: It is something we have considered but again, as with all the other
> application developers out there on other platforms, until we can plonk a
> machine and operating system in front of them, there is little point. The
> perennial problem, of course is that these companies are busy with their main
> activities and seeing their product ported to another platform, particularly
> one as small as the Amiga is not something that they wish to consider. In the
> end, they will only 'get out of bed' if there is a large market or we provide
> them with financial incentive.

Something you've considered? Are you serious? You mean to tell me.... and the rest of the Amiga community that you guys have been sitting there wasting your time doing -NOTHING- about designing a REAL Amiga browser? So all this time you've "considered" hiring someone else to make programs for you?

Makes me wonder just how "THIN" this new Amiga OS 4 is going to be... seems every type of program that has been asked about is always put on a shelf or planned for another release of the OS later on...

Just what in the hell are you going to include on AOS 4? IF that is.. IF you ever do release it... or is it going to be "NEXT FALL" like you always say. Yeah Flea-cy... it's always "NEXT FALL" with you guys isn't it?

Let's look at another question....

> QUESTION:
> 10) Pig: "Where do you see the company in 5 years, and where do you see
> AmigaOS at that time?".

> ANSWER:
> Fleecy: I hope that we are on many different types of device and providing a
> seamless digital enviroment for users irrespective of their hardware. We have
> a marketing slogan we use, the new WWW, which means Whatever, Wherever,
> Whenever.

Yeah... a very fitting marketing slogan for you guys! Seems the attitude I picked up off of that is that you flat out don't care about Amiga computers anymore. WHy don't you just retire Fleecy? I said it before and I'll say it again. this time so you can read it! Amiga Inc, will NEVER make a comeback as long as Flea-cy Moss (that's you!) is a part of it.

I'm getting sick of your broken promises.. outright lies.. and attempts to push an original idea into another Microsuck compatible clone like MaC has become. If you love Microsh1t so much why don't you just go over and get a job with them?

Why does every young punk who gets a job with Amiga think for some damn reason a computer has to be exactly like Microslop? Do you worship Bill Gates Fleecy? Is he your God? Do you kiss his picture at night before you go to sleep? I'd like to know......

Coz I am starting to think your just another "Ed Helper" You know who that is right? The donkey-licking flea-sucking chicken-spank who designed the PC JR (which nearly bankrupted IBM at the time) and then came on over to Amiga.. fired all the best people... and released the unfinished AAA as AGA... hell.. do I have to tell this same sad story again?

Fleecy Moss = Ed Helper the 2nd.

This post will probably be deleted because some mods here might worship the ground you walk on... but I sure as hell don't. I'd kick ya in the nuts if I got near ya.. but you probably wouldn't feel it as it's plainly obvious you don't have any balls.

You sure as hell don't have the balls to forge ahead and beat down your own path to sucess do ya? Instead you gotta follow..... Microsoft? What happened to Amiga being original? It should't rely on other standards.

Whatever happened to "Multiview" being updated as a web browser? Hell.. I guess you'd rather waste money bribing Microsh1t into porting you their buggy, overbloated, suckazz browser instead of simply outdoing them by doing work yourself on it? Isn't that right Flea-cy? Isn't that the real reason? You guys are just as stupid as you are lazy.

So go ahead sissy... make your damn Microsh1t compatible OS... oh... and your nice "calculator" you've probably spent the last 10 months working on.

Oh that's just great!

Gee.. I also see AREXX isn't going to be on the next OS release... Oh how lovely..

Tell us Fleecy... just what the f*ck IS going to be on the next release? Huh? Tell us so somee people don't waste their cash on it only to find out it's basically a bunch of nice calculators and suckazz educational software.

BTW: The last time an Amiga company spent a bucket load of cash on "Emulation" they went belly up... ISA slots... biggest waste of cash Commodore ever spent.. They would have still been around if they hadn't "worried" so much about emulation of ANOTHER platform.

Ok... mods can delete this now. After all.. we wouldn't want ole little "Sensitive Flea-cy"'s eyes to read this and get his little stomach tied in a knot now do we?

This post may "seem" like an insult... but it's really a REAL question in disguise. A bunch of them! Some that are well overdue for an answer or two. But I bet the coward won't even respond to it. Cause it's being asked by someone who absolutely refuses......

........REFUSES! To kiss the ring of Flea-cy Moss (aka Ed Helper Jr)
Jump...
#30 SlimJim #33 KenH #115 alan buxey
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 29Doobrey15-Mar-2003 22:18 GMT
Comment 30SlimJim15-Mar-2003 22:26 GMT
Comment 31Darrin15-Mar-2003 22:29 GMT
Comment 32Darrin15-Mar-2003 22:52 GMT
Comment 33KenH15-Mar-2003 23:00 GMT
Comment 34MuLTiViEW15-Mar-2003 23:27 GMT
Comment 35Abuse16-Mar-2003 01:00 GMT
Comment 36KenH16-Mar-2003 01:07 GMT
Comment 37Anonymous16-Mar-2003 01:13 GMT
Comment 38Anonymous16-Mar-2003 01:26 GMT
Comment 39KenH16-Mar-2003 01:33 GMT
Comment 40Anonymous16-Mar-2003 01:35 GMT
Comment 41Anonymous16-Mar-2003 01:40 GMT
Comment 42MuLTiViEW16-Mar-2003 01:51 GMT
Comment 43Anonymous16-Mar-2003 02:10 GMT
Comment 44MuLTIViEW16-Mar-2003 02:50 GMT
Comment 45Anonymous16-Mar-2003 03:51 GMT
Comment 46sutro16-Mar-2003 04:20 GMT
Comment 47MuLTiViEW16-Mar-2003 04:37 GMT
Comment 48Anonymous16-Mar-2003 04:42 GMT
Comment 49Anonymous16-Mar-2003 04:45 GMT
Comment 50MuLTiViEW16-Mar-2003 04:53 GMT
Comment 51MuLTiViEW16-Mar-2003 05:00 GMT
Comment 52the man in the shadows16-Mar-2003 07:01 GMT
Comment 53DaveP16-Mar-2003 07:22 GMT
Comment 54samface16-Mar-2003 07:23 GMT
Comment 55Anonymous16-Mar-2003 07:39 GMT
Comment 56Dan Boyd16-Mar-2003 07:43 GMT
Comment 57Don Cox16-Mar-2003 07:56 GMT
Comment 58Don Cox16-Mar-2003 08:02 GMT
Comment 59Hooligan/DCS16-Mar-2003 08:52 GMT
Comment 60Anonymous16-Mar-2003 09:33 GMT
Comment 61DaveP16-Mar-2003 09:38 GMT
Comment 62SlimJim16-Mar-2003 10:01 GMT
Comment 63Don Cox16-Mar-2003 10:02 GMT
Comment 64DaveP16-Mar-2003 10:06 GMT
Comment 65MuLTiViEW16-Mar-2003 10:13 GMT
Comment 66MuLTiViEW16-Mar-2003 10:28 GMT
Comment 67SlimJim16-Mar-2003 10:44 GMT
Comment 68SlimJim16-Mar-2003 10:46 GMT
Comment 69priest16-Mar-2003 10:53 GMT
Comment 70Hagge16-Mar-2003 10:56 GMT
Comment 71DaveP16-Mar-2003 11:33 GMT
Comment 72DaveP16-Mar-2003 11:50 GMT
Comment 73SlimJim16-Mar-2003 12:02 GMT
Comment 74Don Cox16-Mar-2003 12:07 GMT
Comment 75reflect16-Mar-2003 12:13 GMT
Comment 76SlimJim16-Mar-2003 12:27 GMT
Comment 77Atheist216-Mar-2003 12:39 GMT
Comment 78Atheist216-Mar-2003 13:00 GMT
Comment 79priest16-Mar-2003 13:06 GMT
Comment 80Atheist216-Mar-2003 13:18 GMT
Comment 81SlimJim16-Mar-2003 13:23 GMT
Comment 82dammy16-Mar-2003 14:18 GMT
Comment 83kriz16-Mar-2003 14:22 GMT
Comment 84Don Cox16-Mar-2003 14:29 GMT
Comment 85szutoman16-Mar-2003 15:02 GMT
Comment 86MIKE16-Mar-2003 15:11 GMT
Comment 87Bridgekeeper16-Mar-2003 17:43 GMT
Comment 88AlBolone16-Mar-2003 18:42 GMT
Comment 89MuLTiViEW16-Mar-2003 19:01 GMT
Comment 90MuLTiViEW16-Mar-2003 19:02 GMT
Comment 91strobe16-Mar-2003 20:30 GMT
Comment 92strobe16-Mar-2003 20:45 GMT
Comment 93KenH16-Mar-2003 20:55 GMT
Comment 94Anonymous16-Mar-2003 21:01 GMT
Comment 95Anonymous16-Mar-2003 21:25 GMT
Comment 96Anonymous16-Mar-2003 21:54 GMT
Comment 97Anonymous16-Mar-2003 21:56 GMT
Comment 98Amiga user (not blind)16-Mar-2003 22:22 GMT
Comment 99Atheist216-Mar-2003 22:24 GMT
Comment 100Atheist216-Mar-2003 22:59 GMT
Comment 101Man with the yellow cat16-Mar-2003 23:09 GMT
Comment 102Atheist216-Mar-2003 23:14 GMT
Comment 103Darth_X17-Mar-2003 00:04 GMT
Comment 104MarkTime17-Mar-2003 00:29 GMT
Comment 105Darth_X17-Mar-2003 00:30 GMT
Comment 106KenH17-Mar-2003 00:53 GMT
Comment 107redfox17-Mar-2003 01:28 GMT
Comment 108Darth_X17-Mar-2003 02:53 GMT
Comment 109MuLTiViEW17-Mar-2003 03:29 GMT
Comment 110Darth_X17-Mar-2003 05:01 GMT
Comment 111Alex Klauke17-Mar-2003 05:56 GMT
Comment 112Hooligan/DCS17-Mar-2003 06:05 GMT
Comment 113Alex Klauke17-Mar-2003 06:34 GMT
Comment 114Darth_X17-Mar-2003 08:55 GMT
Comment 115alan buxey17-Mar-2003 09:55 GMT
Comment 116DaveP17-Mar-2003 11:09 GMT
Comment 117Atheist217-Mar-2003 12:12 GMT
Comment 118the man in the shadows17-Mar-2003 12:13 GMT
Comment 119KenH17-Mar-2003 12:39 GMT
Comment 120AmigaOne XE17-Mar-2003 13:01 GMT
Comment 121pixie17-Mar-2003 14:36 GMT
Comment 122pixie17-Mar-2003 14:39 GMT
Comment 123Don Cox17-Mar-2003 16:17 GMT
Comment 124Lando17-Mar-2003 16:54 GMT
Comment 125MarkTime17-Mar-2003 18:20 GMT
Comment 126dammy17-Mar-2003 18:39 GMT
Comment 127KenH17-Mar-2003 18:44 GMT
Comment 128Gregg17-Mar-2003 19:08 GMT
Comment 129Iggy Drougge17-Mar-2003 20:30 GMT
Comment 130Darth_X17-Mar-2003 20:49 GMT
Comment 131Amiga user (not blind)17-Mar-2003 21:22 GMT
Comment 132Amiga user (not blind)17-Mar-2003 21:22 GMT
Comment 133KenH17-Mar-2003 22:31 GMT
Comment 134AmigaOne XE18-Mar-2003 00:45 GMT
Comment 135dammy18-Mar-2003 04:14 GMT
Comment 136CodeSmith18-Mar-2003 07:59 GMT
Comment 137samface18-Mar-2003 08:13 GMT
Comment 138MuLTiViEW18-Mar-2003 09:45 GMT
Comment 139MuLTiViEW18-Mar-2003 09:47 GMT
Comment 140samface18-Mar-2003 09:51 GMT
Comment 141Amiga user (not blind)18-Mar-2003 10:28 GMT
Comment 142pixie18-Mar-2003 13:01 GMT
Comment 143dammy18-Mar-2003 14:10 GMT
Comment 144Don Cox18-Mar-2003 16:03 GMT
Comment 145Don Cox18-Mar-2003 16:05 GMT
Comment 146Don Cox18-Mar-2003 16:08 GMT
Comment 147Don Cox18-Mar-2003 16:13 GMT
Comment 148Darth_X18-Mar-2003 17:55 GMT
Comment 149spppltt18-Mar-2003 17:57 GMT
Comment 150Darth_X18-Mar-2003 18:03 GMT
Comment 151Darth_X18-Mar-2003 18:11 GMT
Comment 152Anonymous19-Mar-2003 01:58 GMT
Comment 153Anonymous19-Mar-2003 02:00 GMT
Comment 154Darth_X20-Mar-2003 15:46 GMT
Comment 155Darth_X20-Mar-2003 16:11 GMT
Back to Top