18-Apr-2024 23:32 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[Web] PegasosPPC website? Genesi?ANN.lu
Posted on 17-May-2003 17:07 GMT by m0ns00n65 comments
View flat
View list
I did this as a blind url test, and I was amazed at the level of professionalism that is presented at this website. Take a look for ourself: * http://www.pegasosppc.com I don't know if it has been posted before..
List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1Jack Me17-May-2003 15:19 GMT
Comment 2hooligan/dcsRegistered user17-May-2003 15:20 GMT
Comment 3takemehomegrandmaRegistered user17-May-2003 15:26 GMT
Comment 4corpse17-May-2003 15:26 GMT
Comment 5corpse17-May-2003 15:27 GMT
Comment 64pLaYeR17-May-2003 15:31 GMT
Comment 7logain17-May-2003 15:32 GMT
Comment 8Bill Hoggett17-May-2003 15:35 GMT
Comment 9Anonymous17-May-2003 15:39 GMT
Comment 10Don CoxRegistered user17-May-2003 15:55 GMT
Comment 11takemehomegrandmaRegistered user17-May-2003 15:59 GMT
Comment 12Bill Hoggett17-May-2003 16:15 GMT
Comment 13Bill Hoggett17-May-2003 16:16 GMT
Comment 14T_Bone17-May-2003 16:22 GMT
Comment 15hooligan/dcsRegistered user17-May-2003 16:55 GMT
Comment 16greenboyRegistered user17-May-2003 17:45 GMT
Comment 17MIKE17-May-2003 17:48 GMT
Comment 18catohagen17-May-2003 18:13 GMT
Comment 19amigamad17-May-2003 18:26 GMT
Comment 20T_Bone17-May-2003 18:33 GMT
Comment 21Alkis TsapanidisRegistered user17-May-2003 18:47 GMT
Comment 22KenHRegistered user17-May-2003 19:06 GMT
Comment 23Christian KempRegistered user17-May-2003 19:34 GMT
PegasosPPC website? Genesi? : Comment 24 of 65ANN.lu
Posted by Casey R Williams on 17-May-2003 21:27 GMT
I have to say something, I've been quiet too long. That site does look nice. It looks really nice, actually. But then again, 99% of what I've seen from the Pegasos people has been quite reassuring. By now someone reading this has probably pegged me as a blind rabid anti-amiga zealot. Oh how I wish that were the case, but I'm not blind, rather I've seen too much. I've seen numerous announcements regarding Intent which had no mention of Amiga, and there's really nothing to keep me believing that these yayhoos that can't get some shirts printed are ever going to launch a credible computing platform. But Fleecy's latest Q&A was the clincher. Does he expect anyone to believe that Amiga OS5 is really going to happen? I mean how many years has 4.0 been gestating? Does he really believe that 5.0 is even worth discussing given that 4.0 is still months away, 4.2 is even further still, and noone even knows who'd be putting 5.0 together anyway? But sadly, I'm certain there are people who will believe them. I'm not saying sadly as in that they are sad, but that it is sad to see people believing against all logic because they desire the outcome so strongly. I'd love to have seen Amiga reborn, under Gateway with ATI as a partner (though AOL was also involved so I'm also happy it didn't happen), or by Bill and Fleecy. But c'mon people use your heads. The best hope (I didn't say only) is for MOS to succeed, as they can't possibly be as incompetent as the usual morons who head Amiga time after time. If Viscorp had gotten Amiga instead of Gateway, we'd be 5 years ahead of where we are now, MOS would be called AOS and everyone would be happy. I'm not trying to stir anything up here, but the last few weeks have been interesting. I expect Bill to announce a new CEO, or to say it's over kids time to move along. I don't know what's happening over there but it's either insanely great or a total wash. I'll just be happy when Hyperion actually get AOS, as at least I know they can get something done on their own and not just be a front and a trademark for others' hard work.
Jump...
#29 André Siegel #47 NeRP #49 Olegil
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 25Ben17-May-2003 22:11 GMT
Comment 26Wayne HuntRegistered user17-May-2003 23:49 GMT
Comment 27MacCloneSite18-May-2003 02:12 GMT
Comment 28DDJ18-May-2003 02:59 GMT
Comment 29André Siegel18-May-2003 04:11 GMT
Comment 30Don CoxRegistered user18-May-2003 05:21 GMT
Comment 31m0ns00n18-May-2003 06:30 GMT
Comment 32Anonymous18-May-2003 06:37 GMT
Comment 33Anonymous18-May-2003 07:07 GMT
Comment 34Amigan18-May-2003 07:48 GMT
Comment 35Kolbjørn Barmen18-May-2003 07:52 GMT
Comment 36Don CoxRegistered user18-May-2003 08:12 GMT
Comment 37m0ns00n18-May-2003 08:32 GMT
Comment 38Kolbjørn Barmen18-May-2003 08:47 GMT
Comment 39Kolbjørn Barmen18-May-2003 08:49 GMT
Comment 40Kolbjørn Barmen18-May-2003 08:50 GMT
Comment 41Christian KempRegistered user18-May-2003 09:14 GMT
Comment 42Troels ErskingRegistered user18-May-2003 11:08 GMT
Comment 43Don CoxRegistered user18-May-2003 12:07 GMT
Comment 44KayRegistered user18-May-2003 13:12 GMT
Comment 45Nicolas Mendoza18-May-2003 15:53 GMT
Comment 46Kolbjørn Barmen18-May-2003 16:00 GMT
Comment 47NeRP18-May-2003 16:47 GMT
Comment 48Emeric SH18-May-2003 17:15 GMT
Comment 49Olegil18-May-2003 19:04 GMT
Comment 50Olegil18-May-2003 19:17 GMT
Comment 51catohagen18-May-2003 21:03 GMT
Comment 52Anonymous18-May-2003 21:48 GMT
Comment 53bbrvRegistered user19-May-2003 06:21 GMT
Comment 54Anonymous19-May-2003 10:21 GMT
Comment 55Anonymous19-May-2003 10:25 GMT
Comment 56zeigerpuppy19-May-2003 11:06 GMT
Comment 57dammyRegistered user19-May-2003 11:43 GMT
Comment 58Anonymous19-May-2003 13:07 GMT
Comment 59Hagge19-May-2003 14:12 GMT
Comment 60MarkTime19-May-2003 14:32 GMT
Comment 61greenboyRegistered user19-May-2003 16:39 GMT
Comment 62Anonymous19-May-2003 16:52 GMT
Comment 63MarkTime19-May-2003 17:21 GMT
Comment 64Christian KempRegistered user20-May-2003 07:05 GMT
Comment 65TheArrogantSarny25-May-2003 19:12 GMT
Back to Top