| [Web] Fleecy talks again (but not about lawsuits) | ANN.lu |
| Posted on 19-May-2003 03:07 GMT by Raffaele | 37 comments
View flat
View list |
Fleecy Moss "Answers Week nr. 10" is available on :AmigaWorld. Remarkable points are: «Bill McEwen is still CEO.» and «I have no comments to make about any on going lawsuits.»
Hum, seems that Fleecy is "appealing to the fifth amendement".
(well, he has got his fully rights to do so)
Quoting:
-----------
4) Tigger: Where you unaware of what Bill McEwen was going to say in the Bolten Peck case about not being the CEO, or were you intentionally misleading the Amiga Community with your post that Bill McEwen was still the CEO??
Fleecy: Bill McEwen is still CEO. He was CEO before I posted that statement, he was the CEO when I posted that statement and is the CEO today as I type this answer to you. I have no comments to make about any on going lawsuits.
------
End Quoting
Take your own conclusions from these statements...
Bye,
Raffaele
|
|
| List of all comments to this article |
| Fleecy talks again (but not about lawsuits) : Comment 36 of 37 | ANN.lu |
| Posted by Tigger on 21-May-2003 18:33 GMT | In reply to Comment 35 (samface):
>>>>>
Eeeeh... But of course you must understand why they don't talk about legal issues like this in public? "Everything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law...", remember? I doubt it was such a wise decision to talk about this in public by that former Amiga Inc. employee to begin with. I doubt even more that he deliberated this with his lawyer and that his lawyer would agree to doing such public statements.
>>>>>
Because Fleecy is lying and he as an officer of the company can't lie about what a fellow officer of the company under oath. Fleecy could say, Bill said that under oath (which is true), its hard for that to be used against them, its public knowledge Bill McEwen said that, why Fleecy keeps trying to imply he doesnt know about it, cant comment about it, etc, is just trying to fool the Amiga Community, much like the silly Trios comments about the Auction.
>>>>>
Wether the statements are true or not doesn't matter, these kind of public statements can have devastating effects on all possible legal proceedings in the future.
>>>>>
Lets just call it like it really is, Bill said that under oath, Fleecy doesnt want to admit that because it makes his comments earlier all lies, so hes implying that he cant talk about what Bill said under oath, even though everyone knows Bill contradicted him under oath. When the transcript comes out (and it will) are you going to still be the apologist for Fleecy??/
>>>>
You see, even if he thinks this case has been settled, what if Amiga Inc. would take some kind of counter action or if he would end up in a similar situation with a different employer? Everything is possible and therefore it's not a very good idea to make yourself known for saying certain things in public.
>>>>>
I'm sorry Sam, I realize fleecy is coaching you and all, but this post is just getting silly. Amiga Inc cant do any counter action, they lost the suit in December, their time to appeal is over, they still didnt pay, Bill had to come and explain why they couldnt pay the legal debt owed to Bolten Peck. Thats not the only debt they owe, do you still believe the auction next month is because they decided to sell stuff??
-Tig |
|
| List of all comments to this article (continued) |
|
- User Menu
-
- About ANN archives
- The ANN archives is powered by #AmigaZeux. It was updated daily (news last: 22-Oct-2004; comments last: 18-May-2005).
ANN.lu was created, previously owned and maintained by Christian Kemp, www.ckemp.com.
- Contribute
- Not possible at this time!
- Search ANN archives
- Advanced search
- Hosting
- ANN.lu was hosted by Dreamhost. Sign up through this link, mention "ckemp" as referrer and he will get a 10% commission on any account you purchase.
Please show your appreciation for any past, present and future work on ANN.lu by making a contribution via PayPal.
|
