28-Apr-2024 13:05 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[Web] Interview with Matthew Kille - AmigaOS 4.0 GUI DesignANN.lu
Posted on 17-Jun-2003 18:03 GMT by Mike Bouma46 comments
View flat
View list
AmigaWorld.net has interviewed Matthew Kille, the founder of the software company Zeoneo and also the designer of the default AmigaOS4 graphical user-interface. His company developes both for AmigaOS4 and the AmigaDE.
List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1Darth_X17-Jun-2003 16:11 GMT
Comment 2Don CoxRegistered user17-Jun-2003 16:53 GMT
Comment 3Olegil17-Jun-2003 16:54 GMT
Comment 4Remco Komduur17-Jun-2003 17:26 GMT
Comment 5Remco Komduur17-Jun-2003 17:27 GMT
Comment 6tinman17-Jun-2003 17:33 GMT
Comment 7corpse17-Jun-2003 17:48 GMT
Comment 8Remco Komduur17-Jun-2003 18:01 GMT
Comment 9Amon_Re17-Jun-2003 18:11 GMT
Comment 10Amon_Re17-Jun-2003 18:12 GMT
Comment 11Anonymous17-Jun-2003 18:16 GMT
Comment 12Joe "Floid" Kanowitz17-Jun-2003 18:17 GMT
Comment 13Hagge17-Jun-2003 20:36 GMT
Comment 14Kolbjørn Barmen17-Jun-2003 20:37 GMT
Comment 15Amon_Re17-Jun-2003 20:55 GMT
Comment 16Chris17-Jun-2003 22:44 GMT
Comment 17Joe "Floid" Kanowitz17-Jun-2003 23:46 GMT
Comment 18Anonymous18-Jun-2003 01:31 GMT
Comment 19Anonymous18-Jun-2003 01:35 GMT
Comment 20Don CoxRegistered user18-Jun-2003 04:46 GMT
Comment 21Don CoxRegistered user18-Jun-2003 04:53 GMT
Comment 22Olegil18-Jun-2003 06:49 GMT
Comment 23Olegil18-Jun-2003 06:56 GMT
Comment 24Olegil18-Jun-2003 07:05 GMT
Comment 25Anonymous18-Jun-2003 07:50 GMT
Comment 26samface18-Jun-2003 08:12 GMT
Comment 27Peter Gordon18-Jun-2003 08:27 GMT
Comment 28Anonymous18-Jun-2003 08:30 GMT
Comment 29Anonymous18-Jun-2003 08:31 GMT
Comment 30Kjetil18-Jun-2003 08:35 GMT
Comment 31Don CoxRegistered user18-Jun-2003 08:43 GMT
Comment 32Anonymous18-Jun-2003 10:26 GMT
Comment 33Kjetil18-Jun-2003 10:46 GMT
Comment 34Don CoxRegistered user18-Jun-2003 10:57 GMT
Comment 35John Block18-Jun-2003 13:10 GMT
Comment 36Joe "Floid" Kanowitz18-Jun-2003 16:41 GMT
Comment 37koan18-Jun-2003 17:03 GMT
Comment 38Anonymous18-Jun-2003 17:41 GMT
Comment 39tinman18-Jun-2003 18:15 GMT
Comment 40tinman18-Jun-2003 18:29 GMT
Comment 41Ben Hermans/HyperionRegistered user18-Jun-2003 21:07 GMT
Comment 42koan19-Jun-2003 01:51 GMT
Interview with Matthew Kille - AmigaOS 4.0 GUI Design : Comment 43 of 46ANN.lu
Posted by gz on 19-Jun-2003 08:30 GMT
"Even under heavy load, an Amiga still feels responsive -- something which certain other operating systems with modern hardware can still fail to achieve."

I have to disagree with this one because you really cannot compare an amiga workload to a modern software workload on a pc. Should you ever try burning a 750mb file to cd while watching a dvd or divx movie along with winzip packing a file on the background and still be able to reasonably switch between windows or even drawing with a paint program, you would instantly see amigaOS crashing down in flames. This however can be done on a pc system albeit with the side effect of loosing some of the responsiveness but heck! That's just NORMAL when an os is under heavy tasks.

The respnsiveness we are used to get from amigaOS is partly due to the simple fact that there are usually no such heavy tasks run simultaneously on an amiga than people have got to used with doing at work with a pc. When working on a wintel system I leave programs open and running in the background all the time and at the end of the day, there are tens of windows open (webpages, programs, spreadsheets, archives, professional software etc.) and the machine still feels responsive enough for me to work on, even while it's not lightning fast anymore.

I'm not denying the fact that windows is bloatware of the maximum kind and lacks all sorts of optimizations. But It's also unfair to compare amigaOS to it and proud ourselves with the speed difference since there are no similar tasks and software enough to REALISTICALLY do this kind of comparing. I find my os3.5 very fast and I like using it, but if I would perform the aforementioned operations on it it would stop being responsive right there like a car to a brickwall and that's a fact.

I think that the exaggeration of the speed of the amigaOS is also partly due to the fairly low selfesteem of amigans. Lets face it. Our selfesteem has been running low ever since the pc scene started taking over. I remember myself being out there touting how amiga is superior to a pc because it has blitter and copper, etc and that it can have 4096 colours, while on the back of my head knowing that even while everything about blitter and copper were true, the pc still had doom running on it with 256 colours and me having shadow of the beast3 with 16 REAL colours and about 160 maybe onscreen at once at best.

Same thing goes to amigaOS. We want to think it's somehow far superior to other os's because we are emotionally attached to it. Yet at the same time we complain lacking features that exist on other os's and when such features are ported we again praise how we can do this and that with amigaOS and that how amiga like it is.

There are very good merits on amigaOS, but it has serious flaws aswell and due to the above mentioned reasons I don't find a realistic speed comparison between amigaOS and other Os's possible (at least not at the moment).
Jump...
#45 Olegil #46 Olegil
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 44Olegil19-Jun-2003 11:12 GMT
Comment 45Olegil19-Jun-2003 11:17 GMT
Comment 46Olegil19-Jun-2003 11:19 GMT
Back to Top