03-Dec-2022 12:10 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[Web] AmigaOS4.0 to support twenty languagesANN.lu
Posted on 06-Jul-2003 14:54 GMT by Mike Bouma111 comments
View flat
View list
Within the Fleecy's 14th Q&A Session, default OS4 support for twenty languages have been confirmed. Support for more languages may be added.
List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1dammyRegistered user06-Jul-2003 13:09 GMT
Comment 2Mike BoumaRegistered user06-Jul-2003 13:15 GMT
Comment 3Remco komduur06-Jul-2003 13:21 GMT
Comment 4dammyRegistered user06-Jul-2003 13:28 GMT
Comment 5Anonymous06-Jul-2003 13:29 GMT
Comment 6Jon06-Jul-2003 13:37 GMT
Comment 7Anonymous06-Jul-2003 13:42 GMT
Comment 8dammyRegistered user06-Jul-2003 13:42 GMT
Comment 9Anonymous06-Jul-2003 13:47 GMT
Comment 10Ian Shurmer06-Jul-2003 13:50 GMT
Comment 11Anonymous06-Jul-2003 13:50 GMT
Comment 12reflect06-Jul-2003 13:50 GMT
Comment 13Sam Smith06-Jul-2003 13:54 GMT
Comment 14Sam Smith06-Jul-2003 13:56 GMT
Comment 15Troels ErskingRegistered user06-Jul-2003 14:01 GMT
Comment 16smithy06-Jul-2003 14:16 GMT
Comment 17Joe "Floid" Kanowitz06-Jul-2003 14:17 GMT
Comment 18Emeric SH06-Jul-2003 14:25 GMT
Comment 19smithy06-Jul-2003 14:27 GMT
Comment 20Jon06-Jul-2003 14:30 GMT
Comment 21Jack Me06-Jul-2003 14:41 GMT
Comment 22mahenRegistered user06-Jul-2003 14:57 GMT
Comment 23hooligan/dcsRegistered user06-Jul-2003 14:58 GMT
Comment 24Jon06-Jul-2003 15:02 GMT
Comment 25Don CoxRegistered user06-Jul-2003 16:27 GMT
Comment 26Darth_X06-Jul-2003 16:55 GMT
Comment 27Don CoxRegistered user06-Jul-2003 17:16 GMT
Comment 28Don CoxRegistered user06-Jul-2003 17:18 GMT
Comment 29DaveP06-Jul-2003 18:04 GMT
Comment 30Matt Parsons06-Jul-2003 18:56 GMT
Comment 31Matt Parsons06-Jul-2003 19:05 GMT
Comment 32LinusG06-Jul-2003 19:11 GMT
Comment 33Pop sensation06-Jul-2003 19:13 GMT
Comment 34Matt Parsons06-Jul-2003 19:15 GMT
Comment 35Anonymous06-Jul-2003 19:17 GMT
Comment 36Paul H06-Jul-2003 19:18 GMT
Comment 37Matt Parsons06-Jul-2003 19:20 GMT
Comment 38itix06-Jul-2003 19:28 GMT
Comment 39Anonymous06-Jul-2003 19:36 GMT
Comment 40Mike BoumaRegistered user06-Jul-2003 19:47 GMT
Comment 413seas06-Jul-2003 19:56 GMT
Comment 42Lando06-Jul-2003 20:08 GMT
Comment 43smithy06-Jul-2003 20:16 GMT
Comment 44Matt Parsons06-Jul-2003 20:19 GMT
Comment 45Anonymous06-Jul-2003 20:27 GMT
Comment 46Anonymous06-Jul-2003 20:36 GMT
Comment 47Rob06-Jul-2003 20:38 GMT
Comment 48KenHRegistered user06-Jul-2003 20:42 GMT
Comment 49Rob06-Jul-2003 21:03 GMT
Comment 50Matt Parsons06-Jul-2003 21:17 GMT
Comment 51Anonymous06-Jul-2003 21:25 GMT
Comment 52MarkTime06-Jul-2003 21:54 GMT
Comment 53Dammy's boyfriend06-Jul-2003 22:47 GMT
Comment 54Christophe DecaniniRegistered user06-Jul-2003 23:06 GMT
Comment 55dammyRegistered user06-Jul-2003 23:23 GMT
Comment 56Dammy's REAL boyfriend07-Jul-2003 00:40 GMT
Comment 57gary_c07-Jul-2003 01:04 GMT
Comment 583seas07-Jul-2003 01:27 GMT
Comment 59Anonymous07-Jul-2003 01:42 GMT
Comment 60Anonymous07-Jul-2003 02:17 GMT
Comment 61T_Bone07-Jul-2003 03:05 GMT
Comment 62Atheist207-Jul-2003 04:01 GMT
Comment 63DaveP07-Jul-2003 04:50 GMT
Comment 64DaveP07-Jul-2003 04:52 GMT
Comment 65DaveP07-Jul-2003 05:03 GMT
Comment 66DaveP07-Jul-2003 05:05 GMT
Comment 67gary_c07-Jul-2003 05:12 GMT
Comment 68DaveP07-Jul-2003 05:14 GMT
Comment 69DaveP07-Jul-2003 05:15 GMT
Comment 70DaveP07-Jul-2003 05:22 GMT
Comment 71Don CoxRegistered user07-Jul-2003 05:32 GMT
Comment 72Don CoxRegistered user07-Jul-2003 05:35 GMT
Comment 73Emeric SH07-Jul-2003 06:01 GMT
Comment 74Jim Forbes-Ritte (AGAfaster)07-Jul-2003 06:15 GMT
Comment 75Jon07-Jul-2003 06:16 GMT
Comment 76Ketzer07-Jul-2003 06:20 GMT
Comment 77Ketzer07-Jul-2003 06:23 GMT
Comment 78gz07-Jul-2003 06:36 GMT
Comment 79DaveP07-Jul-2003 06:38 GMT
Comment 80gz07-Jul-2003 06:45 GMT
Comment 81gz07-Jul-2003 06:50 GMT
Comment 82DaveP07-Jul-2003 07:18 GMT
Comment 83Matt Parsons07-Jul-2003 08:56 GMT
Comment 84Abuse07-Jul-2003 09:15 GMT
Comment 85Kelly Samel07-Jul-2003 09:57 GMT
Comment 86dammyRegistered user07-Jul-2003 10:42 GMT
Comment 87dammyRegistered user07-Jul-2003 11:07 GMT
Comment 88DaveP07-Jul-2003 11:43 GMT
Comment 89catohagen07-Jul-2003 11:44 GMT
Comment 90Don CoxRegistered user07-Jul-2003 13:05 GMT
Comment 91samface07-Jul-2003 15:00 GMT
Comment 92samface07-Jul-2003 15:16 GMT
Comment 93samface07-Jul-2003 15:33 GMT
Comment 94Don CoxRegistered user07-Jul-2003 16:08 GMT
Comment 95MIKE07-Jul-2003 16:32 GMT
Comment 96smithy07-Jul-2003 16:33 GMT
Comment 97smithy07-Jul-2003 16:34 GMT
Comment 98MIKE07-Jul-2003 16:41 GMT
Comment 99MIKE07-Jul-2003 17:07 GMT
AmigaOS4.0 to support twenty languages : Comment 100 of 111ANN.lu
Posted by dammy on 07-Jul-2003 17:18 GMT
In reply to Comment 92 (samface):
> When Ben Hermans told you about the legal uncertainties (which are still
> uncertainties, mind you) about MorphOS,

No, he was creating FUD, and alot of it. There has been zero proof of anything he's said. His spouting off of FUD against MOS was a huge turn off, atleast for me. I don't appreciate SCO's FUD against Linux, I don't appreciate Ben's FUD against MOS.

> you had already made up your mind, hadn't you? I mean, why would you otherwise > not consider the words from a professional lawyer objectively?

I was happy to initially hear about OS4 as that ment that sham DE desktop was over. Going to a native OS was far more in my favor then DE ever was. I admit I was (and still am) skeptical of a game porting company to build an OS, but it was certainly good news vs DE. Then the FUD and Anti-American drool started to flow from Ben. Please remember Ralph is not my bud, never has, and probably never will be. We've had our fair share of words on CSAM over the years, so I have no reason to be in his corner on this issue. Ben convinced me that even though I have negative opinions of Ralph, Ralph was more then likely in the right on this issue.

As far as a lawyer (which AFAIK, he's not a member of the bar [or it's equivalent] in his own country) is concerned and taking their words with respect, what planet are you from? I've had my fair share of lawyers, and I'm not all that impressed by most of them. When I think lawyer, I automatically associate them with the word, "weasel." So let me get this right Samface, I'm suppost to take the word of a wannabe lawyer, who co-owns a game porting company, word on their competition legal status? What's next, you expect me to pay 800 Euros for a CPU/Mobo that is substandard that currently only runs Linux?

Dammy
Jump...
#101 Anonymous #107 Anonymous
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 101Anonymous07-Jul-2003 18:21 GMT
Comment 102anonymous07-Jul-2003 23:33 GMT
Comment 103anonymous07-Jul-2003 23:53 GMT
Comment 104Julian08-Jul-2003 00:45 GMT
Comment 105Atheist208-Jul-2003 03:31 GMT
Comment 106Matt Parsons08-Jul-2003 13:22 GMT
Comment 107Anonymous08-Jul-2003 13:24 GMT
Comment 108Ian Shurmer08-Jul-2003 15:47 GMT
Comment 109Matt Parsons08-Jul-2003 16:02 GMT
Comment 110anonymous09-Jul-2003 01:45 GMT
Comment 111Matt Parsons09-Jul-2003 09:52 GMT
Back to Top