13-Dec-2024 17:57 GMT.		 UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[Web] AmigaOS4.0 to support twenty languagesANN.lu
Posted on 06-Jul-2003 14:54 GMT by Mike Bouma111 comments
View flat
View list
Within the Fleecy's 14th Q&A Session, default OS4 support for twenty languages have been confirmed. Support for more languages may be added.
List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1dammyRegistered user06-Jul-2003 13:09 GMT
Comment 2Mike BoumaRegistered user06-Jul-2003 13:15 GMT
Comment 3Remco komduur06-Jul-2003 13:21 GMT
Comment 4dammyRegistered user06-Jul-2003 13:28 GMT
Comment 5Anonymous06-Jul-2003 13:29 GMT
Comment 6Jon06-Jul-2003 13:37 GMT
Comment 7Anonymous06-Jul-2003 13:42 GMT
Comment 8dammyRegistered user06-Jul-2003 13:42 GMT
Comment 9Anonymous06-Jul-2003 13:47 GMT
Comment 10Ian Shurmer06-Jul-2003 13:50 GMT
Comment 11Anonymous06-Jul-2003 13:50 GMT
Comment 12reflect06-Jul-2003 13:50 GMT
Comment 13Sam Smith06-Jul-2003 13:54 GMT
Comment 14Sam Smith06-Jul-2003 13:56 GMT
Comment 15Troels ErskingRegistered user06-Jul-2003 14:01 GMT
Comment 16smithy06-Jul-2003 14:16 GMT
Comment 17Joe "Floid" Kanowitz06-Jul-2003 14:17 GMT
Comment 18Emeric SH06-Jul-2003 14:25 GMT
Comment 19smithy06-Jul-2003 14:27 GMT
Comment 20Jon06-Jul-2003 14:30 GMT
Comment 21Jack Me06-Jul-2003 14:41 GMT
Comment 22mahenRegistered user06-Jul-2003 14:57 GMT
Comment 23hooligan/dcsRegistered user06-Jul-2003 14:58 GMT
Comment 24Jon06-Jul-2003 15:02 GMT
Comment 25Don CoxRegistered user06-Jul-2003 16:27 GMT
Comment 26Darth_X06-Jul-2003 16:55 GMT
Comment 27Don CoxRegistered user06-Jul-2003 17:16 GMT
Comment 28Don CoxRegistered user06-Jul-2003 17:18 GMT
AmigaOS4.0 to support twenty languages : Comment 29 of 111ANN.lu
Posted by DaveP on 06-Jul-2003 18:04 GMT
In reply to Comment 16 (smithy):
1. Does Amiga Inc exist? And if so, is there any proof?
Its incorporated. Go look it up in the state of washington. Or you could buy the business license.

2. Who is CEO of Amiga Inc, and is there any proof?
It has been asked before, the answer is Bill McEwen, if you want proof other than what is provided in the Q+A then go hire Rich Woods.

3. Does "Fleecy" work for Amiga Inc?
He claims a job title.

4. Is "Fleecy" in a position to talk about Amiga Inc's plans?
See #3

5. If Amiga Inc does exist, is it in any position to deliver any of "Fleecy"'s plans?
What does it matter to you, honestly? I have never seen you do anything other
than slag off Amiga Inc, claim you have no interest in them or AOS4 so unless you have a pressing need to monitor what they are doing day by day then just walk away and if they come out with anything that interests you, do the whole consumer thing and invest in it. If not, then it hasn't hurt you has it?
Jump...
#43 smithy #62 Atheist2
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 30Matt Parsons06-Jul-2003 18:56 GMT
Comment 31Matt Parsons06-Jul-2003 19:05 GMT
Comment 32LinusG06-Jul-2003 19:11 GMT
Comment 33Pop sensation06-Jul-2003 19:13 GMT
Comment 34Matt Parsons06-Jul-2003 19:15 GMT
Comment 35Anonymous06-Jul-2003 19:17 GMT
Comment 36Paul H06-Jul-2003 19:18 GMT
Comment 37Matt Parsons06-Jul-2003 19:20 GMT
Comment 38itix06-Jul-2003 19:28 GMT
Comment 39Anonymous06-Jul-2003 19:36 GMT
Comment 40Mike BoumaRegistered user06-Jul-2003 19:47 GMT
Comment 413seas06-Jul-2003 19:56 GMT
Comment 42Lando06-Jul-2003 20:08 GMT
Comment 43smithy06-Jul-2003 20:16 GMT
Comment 44Matt Parsons06-Jul-2003 20:19 GMT
Comment 45Anonymous06-Jul-2003 20:27 GMT
Comment 46Anonymous06-Jul-2003 20:36 GMT
Comment 47Rob06-Jul-2003 20:38 GMT
Comment 48KenHRegistered user06-Jul-2003 20:42 GMT
Comment 49Rob06-Jul-2003 21:03 GMT
Comment 50Matt Parsons06-Jul-2003 21:17 GMT
Comment 51Anonymous06-Jul-2003 21:25 GMT
Comment 52MarkTime06-Jul-2003 21:54 GMT
Comment 53Dammy's boyfriend06-Jul-2003 22:47 GMT
Comment 54Christophe DecaniniRegistered user06-Jul-2003 23:06 GMT
Comment 55dammyRegistered user06-Jul-2003 23:23 GMT
Comment 56Dammy's REAL boyfriend07-Jul-2003 00:40 GMT
Comment 57gary_c07-Jul-2003 01:04 GMT
Comment 583seas07-Jul-2003 01:27 GMT
Comment 59Anonymous07-Jul-2003 01:42 GMT
Comment 60Anonymous07-Jul-2003 02:17 GMT
Comment 61T_Bone07-Jul-2003 03:05 GMT
Comment 62Atheist207-Jul-2003 04:01 GMT
Comment 63DaveP07-Jul-2003 04:50 GMT
Comment 64DaveP07-Jul-2003 04:52 GMT
Comment 65DaveP07-Jul-2003 05:03 GMT
Comment 66DaveP07-Jul-2003 05:05 GMT
Comment 67gary_c07-Jul-2003 05:12 GMT
Comment 68DaveP07-Jul-2003 05:14 GMT
Comment 69DaveP07-Jul-2003 05:15 GMT
Comment 70DaveP07-Jul-2003 05:22 GMT
Comment 71Don CoxRegistered user07-Jul-2003 05:32 GMT
Comment 72Don CoxRegistered user07-Jul-2003 05:35 GMT
Comment 73Emeric SH07-Jul-2003 06:01 GMT
Comment 74Jim Forbes-Ritte (AGAfaster)07-Jul-2003 06:15 GMT
Comment 75Jon07-Jul-2003 06:16 GMT
Comment 76Ketzer07-Jul-2003 06:20 GMT
Comment 77Ketzer07-Jul-2003 06:23 GMT
Comment 78gz07-Jul-2003 06:36 GMT
Comment 79DaveP07-Jul-2003 06:38 GMT
Comment 80gz07-Jul-2003 06:45 GMT
Comment 81gz07-Jul-2003 06:50 GMT
Comment 82DaveP07-Jul-2003 07:18 GMT
Comment 83Matt Parsons07-Jul-2003 08:56 GMT
Comment 84Abuse07-Jul-2003 09:15 GMT
Comment 85Kelly Samel07-Jul-2003 09:57 GMT
Comment 86dammyRegistered user07-Jul-2003 10:42 GMT
Comment 87dammyRegistered user07-Jul-2003 11:07 GMT
Comment 88DaveP07-Jul-2003 11:43 GMT
Comment 89catohagen07-Jul-2003 11:44 GMT
Comment 90Don CoxRegistered user07-Jul-2003 13:05 GMT
Comment 91samface07-Jul-2003 15:00 GMT
Comment 92samface07-Jul-2003 15:16 GMT
Comment 93samface07-Jul-2003 15:33 GMT
Comment 94Don CoxRegistered user07-Jul-2003 16:08 GMT
Comment 95MIKE07-Jul-2003 16:32 GMT
Comment 96smithy07-Jul-2003 16:33 GMT
Comment 97smithy07-Jul-2003 16:34 GMT
Comment 98MIKE07-Jul-2003 16:41 GMT
Comment 99MIKE07-Jul-2003 17:07 GMT
Comment 100dammyRegistered user07-Jul-2003 17:18 GMT
Comment 101Anonymous07-Jul-2003 18:21 GMT
Comment 102anonymous07-Jul-2003 23:33 GMT
Comment 103anonymous07-Jul-2003 23:53 GMT
Comment 104Julian08-Jul-2003 00:45 GMT
Comment 105Atheist208-Jul-2003 03:31 GMT
Comment 106Matt Parsons08-Jul-2003 13:22 GMT
Comment 107Anonymous08-Jul-2003 13:24 GMT
Comment 108Ian Shurmer08-Jul-2003 15:47 GMT
Comment 109Matt Parsons08-Jul-2003 16:02 GMT
Comment 110anonymous09-Jul-2003 01:45 GMT
Comment 111Matt Parsons09-Jul-2003 09:52 GMT
Back to Top