28-Jan-2023 10:32 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[Web] AmigaOS4.0 to support twenty languagesANN.lu
Posted on 06-Jul-2003 14:54 GMT by Mike Bouma111 comments
View flat
View list
Within the Fleecy's 14th Q&A Session, default OS4 support for twenty languages have been confirmed. Support for more languages may be added.
List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1dammyRegistered user06-Jul-2003 13:09 GMT
Comment 2Mike BoumaRegistered user06-Jul-2003 13:15 GMT
Comment 3Remco komduur06-Jul-2003 13:21 GMT
Comment 4dammyRegistered user06-Jul-2003 13:28 GMT
Comment 5Anonymous06-Jul-2003 13:29 GMT
Comment 6Jon06-Jul-2003 13:37 GMT
Comment 7Anonymous06-Jul-2003 13:42 GMT
Comment 8dammyRegistered user06-Jul-2003 13:42 GMT
Comment 9Anonymous06-Jul-2003 13:47 GMT
Comment 10Ian Shurmer06-Jul-2003 13:50 GMT
Comment 11Anonymous06-Jul-2003 13:50 GMT
Comment 12reflect06-Jul-2003 13:50 GMT
Comment 13Sam Smith06-Jul-2003 13:54 GMT
Comment 14Sam Smith06-Jul-2003 13:56 GMT
Comment 15Troels ErskingRegistered user06-Jul-2003 14:01 GMT
Comment 16smithy06-Jul-2003 14:16 GMT
Comment 17Joe "Floid" Kanowitz06-Jul-2003 14:17 GMT
Comment 18Emeric SH06-Jul-2003 14:25 GMT
Comment 19smithy06-Jul-2003 14:27 GMT
Comment 20Jon06-Jul-2003 14:30 GMT
Comment 21Jack Me06-Jul-2003 14:41 GMT
Comment 22mahenRegistered user06-Jul-2003 14:57 GMT
Comment 23hooligan/dcsRegistered user06-Jul-2003 14:58 GMT
Comment 24Jon06-Jul-2003 15:02 GMT
Comment 25Don CoxRegistered user06-Jul-2003 16:27 GMT
Comment 26Darth_X06-Jul-2003 16:55 GMT
Comment 27Don CoxRegistered user06-Jul-2003 17:16 GMT
Comment 28Don CoxRegistered user06-Jul-2003 17:18 GMT
Comment 29DaveP06-Jul-2003 18:04 GMT
Comment 30Matt Parsons06-Jul-2003 18:56 GMT
Comment 31Matt Parsons06-Jul-2003 19:05 GMT
Comment 32LinusG06-Jul-2003 19:11 GMT
Comment 33Pop sensation06-Jul-2003 19:13 GMT
Comment 34Matt Parsons06-Jul-2003 19:15 GMT
Comment 35Anonymous06-Jul-2003 19:17 GMT
Comment 36Paul H06-Jul-2003 19:18 GMT
Comment 37Matt Parsons06-Jul-2003 19:20 GMT
Comment 38itix06-Jul-2003 19:28 GMT
Comment 39Anonymous06-Jul-2003 19:36 GMT
Comment 40Mike BoumaRegistered user06-Jul-2003 19:47 GMT
Comment 413seas06-Jul-2003 19:56 GMT
Comment 42Lando06-Jul-2003 20:08 GMT
Comment 43smithy06-Jul-2003 20:16 GMT
Comment 44Matt Parsons06-Jul-2003 20:19 GMT
Comment 45Anonymous06-Jul-2003 20:27 GMT
Comment 46Anonymous06-Jul-2003 20:36 GMT
Comment 47Rob06-Jul-2003 20:38 GMT
Comment 48KenHRegistered user06-Jul-2003 20:42 GMT
Comment 49Rob06-Jul-2003 21:03 GMT
Comment 50Matt Parsons06-Jul-2003 21:17 GMT
Comment 51Anonymous06-Jul-2003 21:25 GMT
Comment 52MarkTime06-Jul-2003 21:54 GMT
Comment 53Dammy's boyfriend06-Jul-2003 22:47 GMT
Comment 54Christophe DecaniniRegistered user06-Jul-2003 23:06 GMT
Comment 55dammyRegistered user06-Jul-2003 23:23 GMT
Comment 56Dammy's REAL boyfriend07-Jul-2003 00:40 GMT
Comment 57gary_c07-Jul-2003 01:04 GMT
Comment 583seas07-Jul-2003 01:27 GMT
Comment 59Anonymous07-Jul-2003 01:42 GMT
Comment 60Anonymous07-Jul-2003 02:17 GMT
Comment 61T_Bone07-Jul-2003 03:05 GMT
Comment 62Atheist207-Jul-2003 04:01 GMT
Comment 63DaveP07-Jul-2003 04:50 GMT
Comment 64DaveP07-Jul-2003 04:52 GMT
Comment 65DaveP07-Jul-2003 05:03 GMT
Comment 66DaveP07-Jul-2003 05:05 GMT
Comment 67gary_c07-Jul-2003 05:12 GMT
Comment 68DaveP07-Jul-2003 05:14 GMT
Comment 69DaveP07-Jul-2003 05:15 GMT
Comment 70DaveP07-Jul-2003 05:22 GMT
Comment 71Don CoxRegistered user07-Jul-2003 05:32 GMT
Comment 72Don CoxRegistered user07-Jul-2003 05:35 GMT
Comment 73Emeric SH07-Jul-2003 06:01 GMT
Comment 74Jim Forbes-Ritte (AGAfaster)07-Jul-2003 06:15 GMT
Comment 75Jon07-Jul-2003 06:16 GMT
Comment 76Ketzer07-Jul-2003 06:20 GMT
Comment 77Ketzer07-Jul-2003 06:23 GMT
Comment 78gz07-Jul-2003 06:36 GMT
Comment 79DaveP07-Jul-2003 06:38 GMT
Comment 80gz07-Jul-2003 06:45 GMT
Comment 81gz07-Jul-2003 06:50 GMT
Comment 82DaveP07-Jul-2003 07:18 GMT
Comment 83Matt Parsons07-Jul-2003 08:56 GMT
Comment 84Abuse07-Jul-2003 09:15 GMT
Comment 85Kelly Samel07-Jul-2003 09:57 GMT
Comment 86dammyRegistered user07-Jul-2003 10:42 GMT
Comment 87dammyRegistered user07-Jul-2003 11:07 GMT
Comment 88DaveP07-Jul-2003 11:43 GMT
Comment 89catohagen07-Jul-2003 11:44 GMT
Comment 90Don CoxRegistered user07-Jul-2003 13:05 GMT
Comment 91samface07-Jul-2003 15:00 GMT
Comment 92samface07-Jul-2003 15:16 GMT
Comment 93samface07-Jul-2003 15:33 GMT
Comment 94Don CoxRegistered user07-Jul-2003 16:08 GMT
Comment 95MIKE07-Jul-2003 16:32 GMT
AmigaOS4.0 to support twenty languages : Comment 96 of 111ANN.lu
Posted by smithy on 07-Jul-2003 16:33 GMT
In reply to Comment 63 (DaveP):
>I just consider it a boring waste of
>time.

Obviously it's a sore point with you.. I would just ignore boring waste of times, rather than get very defensive about them.

>It seems to me that certain rabidly anti-Amiga Inc continually ask the
>same mantra of questions,

This mantra of questions have never been answered. If they had been, the same questions wouldn't have to be re-asked. Perhaps you should be complaining about the silence from a certain party over these issues, instead of following the classic troll tactic : questioning the right to debate something, rather than debating it to distract from a topic the troll finds inconvenient. We don't any trolls here.

>although you saved yourself by not harping on about
>t-shirts.

Well this question has been answered... "real soon now", was it?

>If you had asked this catalogue of questions on any technical forum user site
>to which you had frequented long enough to know better you would have got the
>same kind of curt response.

Of course I would, but this isn't a technical forum. I've asked a reasonable set of questions and you are questioning my right to ask them. Could it be you fear the truth?

>If you really wanted to ask those questions you would have registered on
>AmigaWorld.net ( or even read through the back catalogue of Q+A to find out
>which ones have already been asked and, err some have ) and put them yourself.

No questions of any substance have been answered.

>However, given you question the veracity of the answerer ( Fleecy ) then you
>need to put those questions to someone whom you actually believe otherwise you
>are just wasting time and bandwidth.

That's the problem, I wouldn't believe anything any of them had to say. I remember the infamous "November incident", where in November 2001 where OS4 was supposed to be displayed at WOA-UK, it turned out that no work had been done on it for months... and in that interim period, after work had stopped and before the show, at least one interview I read from an Amiga Inc staffperson promised it was all going according to schedule! There are other cases that some have mentioned in this thread about contradictions between verified events and Amiga Inc's spin on them....

>So find someone whom you trust, go fire the questions at them, get the answers
>from them.

I'll believe the court documents when I see them.
Jump...
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 97smithy07-Jul-2003 16:34 GMT
Comment 98MIKE07-Jul-2003 16:41 GMT
Comment 99MIKE07-Jul-2003 17:07 GMT
Comment 100dammyRegistered user07-Jul-2003 17:18 GMT
Comment 101Anonymous07-Jul-2003 18:21 GMT
Comment 102anonymous07-Jul-2003 23:33 GMT
Comment 103anonymous07-Jul-2003 23:53 GMT
Comment 104Julian08-Jul-2003 00:45 GMT
Comment 105Atheist208-Jul-2003 03:31 GMT
Comment 106Matt Parsons08-Jul-2003 13:22 GMT
Comment 107Anonymous08-Jul-2003 13:24 GMT
Comment 108Ian Shurmer08-Jul-2003 15:47 GMT
Comment 109Matt Parsons08-Jul-2003 16:02 GMT
Comment 110anonymous09-Jul-2003 01:45 GMT
Comment 111Matt Parsons09-Jul-2003 09:52 GMT
Back to Top