24-Apr-2024 22:47 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[News] AmigaOne Lite Specs revealedANN.lu
Posted on 20-Sep-2003 16:10 GMT by Pentrite (Edited on 2003-09-21 15:43:18 GMT by Christian Kemp)35 comments
View flat
View list
Eyetech revealed the Amigaone Lite specs in AW.net forums.Here Better link
List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1Ben20-Sep-2003 14:19 GMT
Comment 2takemehomegrandmaRegistered user20-Sep-2003 15:20 GMT
Comment 3catohagen20-Sep-2003 16:29 GMT
Comment 4LinusG20-Sep-2003 16:39 GMT
Comment 5Don CoxRegistered user20-Sep-2003 17:12 GMT
Comment 6Ben20-Sep-2003 17:22 GMT
Comment 7Ben20-Sep-2003 17:28 GMT
Comment 8Anonymous20-Sep-2003 18:04 GMT
Comment 9Joe "Floid" Kanowitz20-Sep-2003 19:38 GMT
Comment 10Anonymous20-Sep-2003 19:45 GMT
Comment 11Lando20-Sep-2003 22:52 GMT
Comment 12Raffaele21-Sep-2003 02:04 GMT
Comment 13Anonymous21-Sep-2003 02:05 GMT
Comment 14Raffaele21-Sep-2003 02:07 GMT
Comment 15Fredrik (Fjudde)21-Sep-2003 05:06 GMT
Comment 16Anony Mouse21-Sep-2003 05:14 GMT
Comment 17Anonymous21-Sep-2003 05:49 GMT
Comment 18Olegil21-Sep-2003 07:16 GMT
Comment 19Nickman21-Sep-2003 07:35 GMT
Comment 20Anony Mouse21-Sep-2003 08:17 GMT
Comment 21Ami60321-Sep-2003 08:53 GMT
Comment 22Olegil21-Sep-2003 08:55 GMT
Comment 23John Block21-Sep-2003 09:05 GMT
Comment 24takemehomegrandmaRegistered user21-Sep-2003 09:33 GMT
Comment 25Anonymous21-Sep-2003 09:35 GMT
Comment 26Raffaele21-Sep-2003 10:08 GMT
Comment 27Anony Mouse21-Sep-2003 16:15 GMT
Comment 28Anonymous21-Sep-2003 17:06 GMT
AmigaOne Lite Specs revealed : Comment 29 of 35ANN.lu
Posted by Joe "Floid" Kanowitz on 21-Sep-2003 18:04 GMT
In reply to Comment 25 (Anonymous):
Anonymous said,
>> I assume this sort of reaction is what Eyetech/Mai are looking for as they
>> refine the design... Anyone hold a conflicting opinion?

> Nope, I agree completely :-). I too want a DVI connection on the board.
> However, unlike you, I want two of them, because TFTs that can do more
> than 1280x1024 are still way too expensive and look set to remain that
> for quite some time. Besides, two inexpensive TFTs each capable of
> doing 1280x1024 will give you approximately 36.5 per cent /more/ screen
> real-estate than one capable of doing 1600x1200.

> Something to think about, eh? :-)

Indeed, that'd rule, but I assume this is *supposed* to be the low-end/cost-reduced model. ;) I'm not sure how the Radeon TV-out works, I assume the chip is at most twin-head (I get the impression this might be a laptop Radeon, don't really know how many 'heads' or features those include), so if you have to shuffle things around, it feels like it'd be best to have the S-Vid on a separate head for convenience of low-end video work or home-entertainment gadgetry.

(Since, for about the next 5-10 years, I imagine big "TVs" will still be more common/affordable than the big 'displays.' ... So it's more likely that myself, as a user, will want to hook it to one 'display' and one 'TV' now - and watch DVD or something on the 'TV' head while working on the main display - and by the time a wall-sized DVI panel is cheap enough, the hardware will probably be old enough that I won't mind dedicating it to the 'embedded' task, as a generic browser-box/MP3 player/DVD player, maybe with an ATSC card in the PCI slot.)

After all, the XE still exists if you want the freedom to drop in a full twinhead card. It'd be nice to see them both hit the same low pricepoint, the XE 'big' and expandable, but with the added cost of supplying your own video card and such, the Lite closer to a full system... Maybe with a 32MB or 64MB SODIMM included so you can boot it out of the box? Those must be down to like $2 in surplus now, though we might still need buffered/registered...
Jump...
#33 Olegil
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 30Anonymous22-Sep-2003 03:04 GMT
Comment 31Olegil22-Sep-2003 06:00 GMT
Comment 32Olegil22-Sep-2003 06:29 GMT
Comment 33Olegil22-Sep-2003 06:32 GMT
Comment 34Anony Mouse22-Sep-2003 07:36 GMT
Comment 35vortexau22-Sep-2003 09:01 GMT
Back to Top