29-Mar-2024 08:21 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[Motd] MOTD 24/Sep/2003ANN.lu
Posted on 24-Sep-2003 20:35 GMT by Christian Kemp38 comments
View flat
View list
I have changed the bevahiour of the "Unmoderated" category: starting today, posted items will only stay there until they are moved to a different category, or deleted. All old/unmoderated items have been moved to "Forum".
List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1takemehomegrandmaRegistered user24-Sep-2003 18:44 GMT
Comment 2Anonymous24-Sep-2003 18:44 GMT
Comment 3Christian KempRegistered user24-Sep-2003 18:46 GMT
Comment 4Anonymous24-Sep-2003 18:47 GMT
Comment 5bbrvRegistered user24-Sep-2003 18:48 GMT
Comment 6Christian KempRegistered user24-Sep-2003 18:48 GMT
Comment 7Anonymous24-Sep-2003 18:49 GMT
Comment 8Christian KempRegistered user24-Sep-2003 18:51 GMT
Comment 9Anonymous24-Sep-2003 19:04 GMT
Comment 10Anonymous24-Sep-2003 19:05 GMT
Comment 11Anonymous24-Sep-2003 19:15 GMT
Comment 12IanSRegistered user24-Sep-2003 19:21 GMT
Comment 13bbrvRegistered user24-Sep-2003 20:51 GMT
MOTD 24/Sep/2003 : Comment 14 of 38ANN.lu
Posted by Raffaele on 24-Sep-2003 21:01 GMT
Bad move Christian.

Now being all *GREEN* (colour of the forum)...

...I can't distinguish at at first glance, the trash, from something interesting.

And I think it is the first impression a lot of people had.


Maybe for the really crap things (if signalled by a certain amount of writers into that threads or for a matter of reasoning), you can move those all to a subpage, giving it a "chocolate" colour in order to singnal to other readers what is it...

For example, titles regarding bankrupcy of Genesi are sure a trollish thread and deserve or to be deleted, or to be moved into a subsection regarding trash news.

BUT UNMODERATED MUST REMAIN DIVIDED FROM FORUM, ALSO OLD NEWS...

This is MHO, sure you remain the owner and absolute master of your site, and could act at your own wish.


Ciao,

Raffaele
Jump...
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 15Anonymous24-Sep-2003 21:23 GMT
Comment 16IanSRegistered user24-Sep-2003 21:29 GMT
Comment 17mark25-Sep-2003 00:36 GMT
Comment 18MarkTime25-Sep-2003 00:47 GMT
Comment 19MarkTime25-Sep-2003 01:03 GMT
Comment 20MarkTime25-Sep-2003 01:20 GMT
Comment 21CodeSmith25-Sep-2003 02:09 GMT
Comment 22Anonymous25-Sep-2003 04:40 GMT
Comment 23Anonymous25-Sep-2003 05:53 GMT
Comment 24Anonymous25-Sep-2003 05:56 GMT
Comment 25Raffaele25-Sep-2003 07:36 GMT
Comment 26Paul GaddRegistered user25-Sep-2003 07:42 GMT
Comment 27Anonymous25-Sep-2003 07:58 GMT
Comment 28Anonymous25-Sep-2003 09:23 GMT
Comment 29Rik Sweeney25-Sep-2003 09:42 GMT
Comment 30Anonymous25-Sep-2003 09:48 GMT
Comment 31BrianK25-Sep-2003 14:14 GMT
Comment 32Anonymous25-Sep-2003 15:27 GMT
Comment 33Kjetil25-Sep-2003 16:02 GMT
Comment 34MarkTime25-Sep-2003 16:46 GMT
Comment 35MarkTime25-Sep-2003 16:49 GMT
Comment 36Anonymous25-Sep-2003 18:32 GMT
Comment 37Codesmith25-Sep-2003 22:45 GMT
Comment 38mark28-Sep-2003 16:00 GMT
Back to Top