20-Apr-2024 06:40 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[Motd] MOTD 24/Sep/2003ANN.lu
Posted on 24-Sep-2003 20:35 GMT by Christian Kemp38 comments
View flat
View list
I have changed the bevahiour of the "Unmoderated" category: starting today, posted items will only stay there until they are moved to a different category, or deleted. All old/unmoderated items have been moved to "Forum".
List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1takemehomegrandmaRegistered user24-Sep-2003 18:44 GMT
Comment 2Anonymous24-Sep-2003 18:44 GMT
Comment 3Christian KempRegistered user24-Sep-2003 18:46 GMT
Comment 4Anonymous24-Sep-2003 18:47 GMT
Comment 5bbrvRegistered user24-Sep-2003 18:48 GMT
Comment 6Christian KempRegistered user24-Sep-2003 18:48 GMT
Comment 7Anonymous24-Sep-2003 18:49 GMT
Comment 8Christian KempRegistered user24-Sep-2003 18:51 GMT
Comment 9Anonymous24-Sep-2003 19:04 GMT
Comment 10Anonymous24-Sep-2003 19:05 GMT
Comment 11Anonymous24-Sep-2003 19:15 GMT
Comment 12IanSRegistered user24-Sep-2003 19:21 GMT
Comment 13bbrvRegistered user24-Sep-2003 20:51 GMT
Comment 14Raffaele24-Sep-2003 21:01 GMT
Comment 15Anonymous24-Sep-2003 21:23 GMT
Comment 16IanSRegistered user24-Sep-2003 21:29 GMT
Comment 17mark25-Sep-2003 00:36 GMT
Comment 18MarkTime25-Sep-2003 00:47 GMT
Comment 19MarkTime25-Sep-2003 01:03 GMT
MOTD 24/Sep/2003 : Comment 20 of 38ANN.lu
Posted by MarkTime on 25-Sep-2003 01:20 GMT
In reply to Comment 15 (Anonymous):
when people discuss 'trolls' it's because they don't have anything else to talk about.

the fact is, when someone hears something they don't agree with, 'trolling' is the knee jerk accuasation that comes flying out.

If anyone wants to discuss free speech topics in-depth, I'd be glad too. The fact is, I am not one who cries 'CENSORSHIP' though I will call censorship, censorship...thats just the correct word to use, sometimes...sorry if you don't like it.

But nevertheless, I fully support censorship at private websites like this one, private property is more important than free speech,...well I shouldn't say important, just more fundamental... without private property you'll never have free speech anyway.

But I do deride people who just say, I want to get rid of the rudeness....
as a matter of fact, I think that being rude is usually a mistake, but
there is a problem in trying to rid yourself of it.

The reason is, some ideas are inherently offensive. Free speech is only really
about 'political' speech which has nothing to do with ann anyway.
I mean you could say its more than political speech, but the highest level
of protection goes to political speech, in most countries.

The reason rudeness has to be protected, in terms of political speech, is because it is inherently offensive to go against society and the establishment.
To go against an idea, that has been built up by 2,000 years of Christian
tradition, for example, is going to be offensive. It will seem rude, maybe
even sacriligious to some. But thats how change comes about. Ideas are
thought of, they are advocated, and eventually they take hold.

Now you go back to ann.lu, which is a news site for amiga like related things.
This is never going to amount to what we consider the highest level of protected speech.

I'm a realist. I don't cry censorship. Certainly I haven't even witnessed
anything close to censorship, and even if I had, I wouldn't be against
the right of Christian to do it.

But what I will do, is call all these nancy drew's who get upset when someone
says that Amiga, Inc. isn't all they purport themselves to be, and think
the world is ending and full of hatred and trolls....well, I'll say to them
they out to think about growing some thicker skin.
Jump...
#21 CodeSmith #22 Anonymous
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 21CodeSmith25-Sep-2003 02:09 GMT
Comment 22Anonymous25-Sep-2003 04:40 GMT
Comment 23Anonymous25-Sep-2003 05:53 GMT
Comment 24Anonymous25-Sep-2003 05:56 GMT
Comment 25Raffaele25-Sep-2003 07:36 GMT
Comment 26Paul GaddRegistered user25-Sep-2003 07:42 GMT
Comment 27Anonymous25-Sep-2003 07:58 GMT
Comment 28Anonymous25-Sep-2003 09:23 GMT
Comment 29Rik Sweeney25-Sep-2003 09:42 GMT
Comment 30Anonymous25-Sep-2003 09:48 GMT
Comment 31BrianK25-Sep-2003 14:14 GMT
Comment 32Anonymous25-Sep-2003 15:27 GMT
Comment 33Kjetil25-Sep-2003 16:02 GMT
Comment 34MarkTime25-Sep-2003 16:46 GMT
Comment 35MarkTime25-Sep-2003 16:49 GMT
Comment 36Anonymous25-Sep-2003 18:32 GMT
Comment 37Codesmith25-Sep-2003 22:45 GMT
Comment 38mark28-Sep-2003 16:00 GMT
Back to Top