07-Dec-2021 02:29 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[News] Amiga's Attorneys File motion to Withdraw as Their Attorneys in the Thendic-Amiga LawsuitANN.lu
Posted on 25-Sep-2003 20:26 GMT by Rich Woods147 comments
View flat
View list
Amiga's Attorneys File motion to Withdraw as Their Attorneys in the Thendic-Amiga Lawsuit Although I have known about this action since last weekend I have refrained from posting this info until I had the court documentation available. It has just become available today.

23 MOTION Requesting Leave to Withdraw as Counsel for Defendant by Amiga Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Temp5, ) (Entered: 09/25/2003)

09/19/2003

24 DECLARATION of DIANA S. SHUKIS in Support of 23 MOTION RequestingLeave to Withdraw as Counsel for Defendant, filed by Defendant Amiga Inc. re (Temp5, ) (Entered: 09/25/2003)

09/19/2003

25 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Defendant Amiga Inc re 23 MOTION for Leave to Withdraw as Counsel, 24 Declaration of Diana S. Shukis. (Temp5, ) (Entered: 09/25/2003)

Amiga's attorney's have filed a motion before the Federal Court to withdraw as Attorneys for Amiga - effectively leaving them with no counsel.

This means that they could default on their action(s) and counter-claims.

The documents are available at:

Certificate of Service To Withdraw

Shukis Withdrawl

Withdrawal of Counsel 1

Withdrawal of counsel 2

List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1Emeric SH25-Sep-2003 18:31 GMT
Comment 2takemehomegrandmaRegistered user25-Sep-2003 18:32 GMT
Comment 3takemehomegrandmaRegistered user25-Sep-2003 18:32 GMT
Comment 4dammyRegistered user25-Sep-2003 18:33 GMT
Comment 5Rich Woods25-Sep-2003 18:35 GMT
Comment 6takemehomegrandmaRegistered user25-Sep-2003 18:39 GMT
Comment 7takemehomegrandmaRegistered user25-Sep-2003 18:43 GMT
Comment 8takemehomegrandmaRegistered user25-Sep-2003 18:44 GMT
Comment 9Bill Hoggett25-Sep-2003 18:48 GMT
Comment 10Anonymous25-Sep-2003 18:48 GMT
Comment 11Rich Woods25-Sep-2003 18:49 GMT
Comment 12Kronos25-Sep-2003 18:49 GMT
Comment 13Kronos25-Sep-2003 18:50 GMT
Comment 14Tryo25-Sep-2003 18:52 GMT
Comment 15takemehomegrandmaRegistered user25-Sep-2003 18:55 GMT
Comment 16T_Bone25-Sep-2003 18:56 GMT
Comment 17Rich Woods25-Sep-2003 18:57 GMT
Comment 18takemehomegrandmaRegistered user25-Sep-2003 19:00 GMT
Comment 19T_Bone25-Sep-2003 19:02 GMT
Comment 20Fabio Alemagna25-Sep-2003 19:03 GMT
Comment 21Rich Woods25-Sep-2003 19:03 GMT
Comment 22Rich Woods25-Sep-2003 19:05 GMT
Comment 23Fabio Alemagna25-Sep-2003 19:10 GMT
Comment 24takemehomegrandmaRegistered user25-Sep-2003 19:10 GMT
Comment 25takemehomegrandmaRegistered user25-Sep-2003 19:11 GMT
Comment 26Martin Blom25-Sep-2003 19:12 GMT
Comment 27Rich Woods25-Sep-2003 19:17 GMT
Comment 28Anonymous25-Sep-2003 19:25 GMT
Comment 29Fabio Alemagna25-Sep-2003 19:29 GMT
Comment 30takemehomegrandmaRegistered user25-Sep-2003 19:31 GMT
Comment 31Rich Woods25-Sep-2003 19:35 GMT
Comment 32Anonymous25-Sep-2003 19:36 GMT
Comment 33T_Bone25-Sep-2003 19:38 GMT
Comment 34Anonymous25-Sep-2003 19:39 GMT
Comment 35Fabio Alemagna25-Sep-2003 19:39 GMT
Comment 36T_Bone25-Sep-2003 19:40 GMT
Comment 37Paul GaddRegistered user25-Sep-2003 19:40 GMT
Comment 38Rich Woods25-Sep-2003 19:41 GMT
Comment 39Anonymous25-Sep-2003 19:41 GMT
Comment 40Bill Hoggett25-Sep-2003 19:42 GMT
Comment 41Anonymous25-Sep-2003 19:43 GMT
Comment 42Rich Woods25-Sep-2003 19:48 GMT
Comment 43T_Bone25-Sep-2003 19:50 GMT
Comment 44Fabio Alemagna25-Sep-2003 19:51 GMT
Comment 45takemehomegrandmaRegistered user25-Sep-2003 19:53 GMT
Comment 46Fabio Alemagna25-Sep-2003 19:53 GMT
Comment 47takemehomegrandmaRegistered user25-Sep-2003 19:54 GMT
Comment 48T_Bone25-Sep-2003 19:57 GMT
Comment 49Gabriele FavrinRegistered user25-Sep-2003 19:58 GMT
Comment 50Anonymous25-Sep-2003 20:04 GMT
Comment 51que25-Sep-2003 20:06 GMT
Comment 52Fabio Alemagna25-Sep-2003 20:08 GMT
Comment 53Anonymous25-Sep-2003 20:10 GMT
Comment 54Gabriele FavrinRegistered user25-Sep-2003 20:12 GMT
Comment 55Fabio Alemagna25-Sep-2003 20:12 GMT
Comment 56Bill Hoggett25-Sep-2003 20:15 GMT
Comment 57T_Bone25-Sep-2003 20:15 GMT
Comment 58Anonymous25-Sep-2003 20:16 GMT
Comment 59Dom Front25-Sep-2003 20:25 GMT
Comment 60Anonymous25-Sep-2003 20:30 GMT
Comment 61Fabio Alemagna25-Sep-2003 20:31 GMT
Comment 62Fabio Alemagna25-Sep-2003 20:32 GMT
Comment 63Fabio Alemagna25-Sep-2003 20:33 GMT
Amiga's Attorneys File motion to Withdraw as Their Attorneys in the Thendic-Amiga Lawsuit : Comment 64 of 147ANN.lu
Posted by Dom Front on 25-Sep-2003 20:40 GMT
In reply to Comment 61 (Fabio Alemagna):
@Fabio

OK, you wish to continue. Here goes.

>> > By stating that this whole thread is useless (I'm summarizing, not quoting
>> > you directly).
>> That is your view of my opinion, and frankly it is ludicrous.

> You keep using offensive adjectives, and expect kindness in return?

I expect no kindness, I do not find "ludicrous" offensive. You have clearly exaggerated my point of view for your own ends and I find that ludicrous. Also, given at this point you used offensive adjectives on me several times before this ( and in a far more insulting tone ) you should not expect "kindness in return".

"Anyway, let's see, how do you define this post of yours if not provocative and no-point-making? "
I never said it was not provocative. I do however see it making a point.


> "You think you know the reasons for one lawyer withdrawing, that from what I can see is pure speculation based on your own personal viewpoint."
Right Fabio. Here you are, you talk on here as if you KNOW what the possible alternatives are ( or rather most of the thread had done up to this point ) the reality check is that it is just speculation.

>2) It's obvious that is pure speculation based on one's viewpoints, no one is saing the opposite. You're just pointing out the obvious.

So in other words, you agree with me. How does pointing out the obvious limit your freedom of speech?

> "Who replace? Someone from the same lawfirm perhaps? Maybe another one?"
> You clearly haven't read the papers, as you'd know that that's not a
> possibility.
I see no rationale, no reasoning in the papers therefore I cannot see how you can conclude that this MUST be the case. Feel free to provide some meat on the bone ( like federal laws that apply eh Rich? ). THAT is called debate. How you launched into me was NOT debate, it was what has taken us on this merrygoround.

> Yet, in the sentence just above that one, you claim that the others are just speculating. Well, at least they speculate on the ground of FACTUAL claims, not imaginated ones as yours.

Where do I imagine facts. I merely pose a question.



> "Cue round of "oooh Im so witty Im going to post something about only being able to pay them in monopoly money ha ha ha""
> You said it, no one else before or after you said it. Do you like so much making up quotes to prove your moot points? That's called intellectual
disonesty, pal.

No. It is called making a prediction, given the previous parts of the thread had included stupid comments about paying them in food coupons I do not think this is wildly out of the ballpark.


> you are saying that what we are doing - that is speculating on this issue - is "fascinating", and it even "amazes" you that inspite of our intelligence we can't see it.

OK, lets be clear, it amazes me that you cannot see your own speculation as being spin based purely in your own personal motivation, despite your intelligence.

> You, no one else but you.
So? What do you think you have proven?

> Want more? I hope not, this should suffice for the rest of the thread, wanadoo.
I don't think you have more Fabio, before you attempt to cut up the rest of my posts on this thread you should take a look at who lead us here. You, no one but you.
Jump...
#70 T_Bone #80 Eva
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 65catohagen25-Sep-2003 20:42 GMT
Comment 66Anonymous25-Sep-2003 20:43 GMT
Comment 67Fabio Alemagna25-Sep-2003 20:47 GMT
Comment 68Dom Front25-Sep-2003 20:51 GMT
Comment 69Rich Woods25-Sep-2003 20:53 GMT
Comment 70T_Bone25-Sep-2003 20:54 GMT
Comment 71T_Bone25-Sep-2003 21:23 GMT
Comment 72Dom Front25-Sep-2003 21:30 GMT
Comment 73wanadoo user25-Sep-2003 21:43 GMT
Comment 74JoannaK25-Sep-2003 21:50 GMT
Comment 75Anonymous25-Sep-2003 21:52 GMT
Comment 76JoannaK25-Sep-2003 22:19 GMT
Comment 77Eva25-Sep-2003 22:39 GMT
Comment 78Eva25-Sep-2003 22:41 GMT
Comment 79Eva25-Sep-2003 22:45 GMT
Comment 80Eva25-Sep-2003 22:48 GMT
Comment 81hooligan/dcsRegistered user25-Sep-2003 23:02 GMT
Comment 82Bill Hoggett25-Sep-2003 23:06 GMT
Comment 83JoannaK25-Sep-2003 23:07 GMT
Comment 84Ronald26-Sep-2003 00:16 GMT
Comment 85EyeAm26-Sep-2003 00:34 GMT
Comment 86Rich Woods26-Sep-2003 00:59 GMT
Comment 87Rich Woods26-Sep-2003 01:29 GMT
Comment 88Rich Woods26-Sep-2003 01:33 GMT
Comment 89Rich Woods26-Sep-2003 01:46 GMT
Comment 90Joe "Floid" Kanowitz26-Sep-2003 02:19 GMT
Comment 91dammyRegistered user26-Sep-2003 02:45 GMT
Comment 92Joe "Floid" Kanowitz26-Sep-2003 02:52 GMT
Comment 93Rich Woods26-Sep-2003 03:14 GMT
Comment 94Anonymous26-Sep-2003 03:41 GMT
Comment 95Anonymous26-Sep-2003 03:42 GMT
Comment 96Joe "Floid" Kanowitz26-Sep-2003 04:00 GMT
Comment 97hammer26-Sep-2003 04:42 GMT
Comment 98Don CoxRegistered user26-Sep-2003 05:21 GMT
Comment 99Anonymous26-Sep-2003 05:46 GMT
Comment 100T_Bone26-Sep-2003 05:50 GMT
Comment 101Tigger26-Sep-2003 05:56 GMT
Comment 102Emeric SH26-Sep-2003 05:59 GMT
Comment 103Amon_ReRegistered user26-Sep-2003 06:02 GMT
Comment 104IanSRegistered user26-Sep-2003 06:12 GMT
Comment 105Emeric SH26-Sep-2003 06:34 GMT
Comment 106Anonymous26-Sep-2003 07:09 GMT
Comment 107Emeric SH26-Sep-2003 07:15 GMT
Comment 108Anonymous26-Sep-2003 07:16 GMT
Comment 109Bill Hoggett26-Sep-2003 07:18 GMT
Comment 110Daniel Miller26-Sep-2003 07:41 GMT
Comment 111Fabio Alemagna26-Sep-2003 07:42 GMT
Comment 112T_Bone26-Sep-2003 08:18 GMT
Comment 113Emeric SH26-Sep-2003 08:21 GMT
Comment 114Anonymous26-Sep-2003 08:29 GMT
Comment 115T_Bone26-Sep-2003 08:43 GMT
Comment 116Fabio Alemagna26-Sep-2003 08:59 GMT
Comment 117Fabio Alemagna26-Sep-2003 09:16 GMT
Comment 118Emeric SH26-Sep-2003 09:27 GMT
Comment 119Fabio Alemagna26-Sep-2003 09:58 GMT
Comment 120Andrea Maniero26-Sep-2003 09:58 GMT
Comment 121T_Bone26-Sep-2003 10:09 GMT
Comment 122Anonymous26-Sep-2003 10:53 GMT
Comment 123gz26-Sep-2003 11:00 GMT
Comment 124Rich Woods26-Sep-2003 12:02 GMT
Comment 125MarkTime26-Sep-2003 12:13 GMT
Comment 126dammyRegistered user26-Sep-2003 12:18 GMT
Comment 127Kronos26-Sep-2003 12:35 GMT
Comment 128Bill Hoggett26-Sep-2003 13:09 GMT
Comment 129T_Bone26-Sep-2003 13:13 GMT
Comment 130dammyRegistered user26-Sep-2003 13:55 GMT
Comment 131smithy26-Sep-2003 14:08 GMT
Comment 132smithy26-Sep-2003 14:11 GMT
Comment 133redfox26-Sep-2003 14:25 GMT
Comment 134Rich Woods26-Sep-2003 14:54 GMT
Comment 135Brain dead bored.26-Sep-2003 16:33 GMT
Comment 136Anonymous26-Sep-2003 16:56 GMT
Comment 137Don CoxRegistered user26-Sep-2003 17:49 GMT
Comment 138EyeAm26-Sep-2003 18:28 GMT
Comment 139Joe "Floid" Kanowitz26-Sep-2003 18:43 GMT
Comment 140EyeAm26-Sep-2003 18:51 GMT
Comment 141MarkTime26-Sep-2003 19:06 GMT
Comment 142JoannaK26-Sep-2003 20:38 GMT
Comment 143EyeAm26-Sep-2003 23:15 GMT
Comment 144Anonymous27-Sep-2003 00:37 GMT
Comment 145gz27-Sep-2003 09:09 GMT
Comment 146EyeAm28-Sep-2003 03:16 GMT
Comment 147naskali28-Sep-2003 12:59 GMT
Back to Top