28-Oct-2021 07:18 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[News] Nova Design Obtains a Judgement of $270,000 against Ryan E. A. CzerwinskiANN.lu
Posted on 13-Oct-2003 06:03 GMT by Rich Woods108 comments
View flat
View list
After quite some time the court case of Nova Design vs. Ryan E. A. Czerwinski has been concluded with a default judgement.

Nova Design has obtained a judgement of $270,000 against Ryan E. A. Czerwinski. After quite some time the court case of Nova Design vs. Ryan E. A. Czerwinski has been concluded with a default judgement.

Nova Design has obtained a judgement of $270,000 against Ryan E. A. Czerwinski.

The judgement with interest and costs are now approx. $335,000+.

Court documentation can be found at merlanciabk

List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1James Carroll13-Oct-2003 04:07 GMT
Comment 2Rich Woods13-Oct-2003 04:09 GMT
Comment 3Anonymous13-Oct-2003 04:16 GMT
Comment 4EyeAm13-Oct-2003 04:38 GMT
Comment 5Anonymous13-Oct-2003 04:43 GMT
Comment 6EyeAm13-Oct-2003 04:47 GMT
Comment 7Anonymous13-Oct-2003 05:25 GMT
Comment 8Anonymous13-Oct-2003 05:30 GMT
Comment 9Madgun6813-Oct-2003 05:32 GMT
Comment 10Anonymous13-Oct-2003 05:32 GMT
Comment 11Don CoxRegistered user13-Oct-2003 05:41 GMT
Comment 12Amon_ReRegistered user13-Oct-2003 05:46 GMT
Comment 13Rich Woods13-Oct-2003 05:49 GMT
Comment 14Rich Woods13-Oct-2003 05:51 GMT
Comment 15T_Bone13-Oct-2003 05:55 GMT
Comment 16Rich Woods13-Oct-2003 05:57 GMT
Comment 17Rich Woods13-Oct-2003 06:18 GMT
Comment 18T_Bone13-Oct-2003 06:25 GMT
Comment 19Rich Woods13-Oct-2003 06:36 GMT
Comment 20John13-Oct-2003 06:39 GMT
Comment 21Rich Woods13-Oct-2003 06:40 GMT
Comment 22Rich Woods13-Oct-2003 06:46 GMT
Comment 23T_Bone13-Oct-2003 06:47 GMT
Comment 24Emeric SH13-Oct-2003 07:00 GMT
Comment 25John13-Oct-2003 07:05 GMT
Comment 26Anonymous13-Oct-2003 07:31 GMT
Comment 27T_Bone13-Oct-2003 07:36 GMT
Comment 28Emeric SH13-Oct-2003 07:43 GMT
Comment 29T_Bone13-Oct-2003 07:53 GMT
Comment 30Wayne HuntRegistered user13-Oct-2003 08:07 GMT
Comment 31Wayne HuntRegistered user13-Oct-2003 08:16 GMT
Comment 32T_Bone13-Oct-2003 08:17 GMT
Comment 33Emeric SH13-Oct-2003 08:42 GMT
Comment 34T_Bone13-Oct-2003 09:14 GMT
Comment 35Lando13-Oct-2003 09:41 GMT
Comment 36T_Bone13-Oct-2003 09:49 GMT
Comment 37Anonymous13-Oct-2003 09:58 GMT
Comment 38Emeric SH13-Oct-2003 10:07 GMT
Comment 39Don CoxRegistered user13-Oct-2003 10:14 GMT
Comment 40Matt Parsons13-Oct-2003 10:31 GMT
Comment 41Bernie MeyerRegistered user13-Oct-2003 10:33 GMT
Comment 42Ann13-Oct-2003 15:27 GMT
Comment 43Ann13-Oct-2003 15:31 GMT
Comment 44Ann13-Oct-2003 15:38 GMT
Comment 45Ann13-Oct-2003 15:43 GMT
Comment 46Ann13-Oct-2003 15:44 GMT
Comment 47Coder13-Oct-2003 15:47 GMT
Comment 48Ann13-Oct-2003 15:53 GMT
Comment 49Rich Woods13-Oct-2003 15:55 GMT
Comment 50Rich Woods13-Oct-2003 16:20 GMT
Comment 51NihilVor13-Oct-2003 16:20 GMT
Comment 52Kjetil13-Oct-2003 17:16 GMT
Comment 53Rich Woods13-Oct-2003 17:38 GMT
Comment 54kevin orme13-Oct-2003 18:13 GMT
Comment 55Christian KempRegistered user13-Oct-2003 18:43 GMT
Comment 56John13-Oct-2003 18:43 GMT
Comment 57SlimJIm13-Oct-2003 19:03 GMT
Comment 583seas13-Oct-2003 19:56 GMT
Comment 59Ben13-Oct-2003 20:20 GMT
Comment 60T_Bone13-Oct-2003 22:36 GMT
Comment 61Rich Woods13-Oct-2003 23:27 GMT
Comment 62T_Bone13-Oct-2003 23:31 GMT
Comment 63Ann13-Oct-2003 23:41 GMT
Comment 64Ann13-Oct-2003 23:44 GMT
Comment 65EyeAm13-Oct-2003 23:48 GMT
Comment 66Anonymous13-Oct-2003 23:58 GMT
Comment 67T_Bone14-Oct-2003 00:13 GMT
Comment 68-14-Oct-2003 00:16 GMT
Comment 69MarkTime14-Oct-2003 00:21 GMT
Comment 70Rich Woods14-Oct-2003 00:25 GMT
Comment 71Rich Woods14-Oct-2003 00:27 GMT
Comment 72Rich Woods14-Oct-2003 00:38 GMT
Comment 73Rich Woods14-Oct-2003 00:45 GMT
Comment 74dammyRegistered user14-Oct-2003 03:13 GMT
Comment 75T_Bone14-Oct-2003 04:59 GMT
Comment 76Don CoxRegistered user14-Oct-2003 05:05 GMT
Comment 77Matt Parsons14-Oct-2003 07:59 GMT
Comment 78T_Bone14-Oct-2003 08:03 GMT
Comment 79Don CoxRegistered user14-Oct-2003 11:19 GMT
Comment 80DaveP14-Oct-2003 11:30 GMT
Comment 81Matt Parsons14-Oct-2003 11:48 GMT
Comment 82DaveP14-Oct-2003 11:51 GMT
Comment 83Matt Parsons14-Oct-2003 12:04 GMT
Comment 84DaveP14-Oct-2003 12:16 GMT
Comment 85T_Bone14-Oct-2003 12:48 GMT
Comment 86Rich Woods14-Oct-2003 13:57 GMT
Comment 87Rich Woods14-Oct-2003 13:59 GMT
Comment 88BrianK14-Oct-2003 14:16 GMT
Comment 89Don CoxRegistered user14-Oct-2003 14:22 GMT
Comment 90Rich Woods14-Oct-2003 14:50 GMT
Comment 91Rich Woods14-Oct-2003 15:07 GMT
Comment 92DaveP14-Oct-2003 15:58 GMT
Comment 93EyeAm14-Oct-2003 16:30 GMT
Comment 94Ann14-Oct-2003 17:27 GMT
Comment 95Ann14-Oct-2003 17:38 GMT
Comment 96dammyRegistered user14-Oct-2003 18:19 GMT
Comment 97Nate DownesRegistered user14-Oct-2003 18:28 GMT
Comment 98Rich Woods15-Oct-2003 00:38 GMT
Comment 99Rich Woods15-Oct-2003 00:45 GMT
Comment 100Ann15-Oct-2003 01:19 GMT
Comment 101vortexau15-Oct-2003 05:09 GMT
Comment 102Don CoxRegistered user15-Oct-2003 05:51 GMT
Comment 103Bill Hoggett15-Oct-2003 13:13 GMT
Comment 104My Name is15-Oct-2003 14:15 GMT
Comment 105Bill Hoggett15-Oct-2003 15:27 GMT
Comment 106Vexar16-Oct-2003 18:17 GMT
Comment 107Nate DownesRegistered user16-Oct-2003 22:52 GMT
Comment 108extended17-Oct-2003 06:44 GMT
Back to Top