29-Mar-2024 00:00 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[News] Nova Design Obtains a Judgement of $270,000 against Ryan E. A. CzerwinskiANN.lu
Posted on 13-Oct-2003 06:03 GMT by Rich Woods108 comments
View flat
View list
After quite some time the court case of Nova Design vs. Ryan E. A. Czerwinski has been concluded with a default judgement.

Nova Design has obtained a judgement of $270,000 against Ryan E. A. Czerwinski. After quite some time the court case of Nova Design vs. Ryan E. A. Czerwinski has been concluded with a default judgement.

Nova Design has obtained a judgement of $270,000 against Ryan E. A. Czerwinski.

The judgement with interest and costs are now approx. $335,000+.

Court documentation can be found at merlanciabk

List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1James Carroll13-Oct-2003 04:07 GMT
Comment 2Rich Woods13-Oct-2003 04:09 GMT
Comment 3Anonymous13-Oct-2003 04:16 GMT
Comment 4EyeAm13-Oct-2003 04:38 GMT
Comment 5Anonymous13-Oct-2003 04:43 GMT
Comment 6EyeAm13-Oct-2003 04:47 GMT
Comment 7Anonymous13-Oct-2003 05:25 GMT
Comment 8Anonymous13-Oct-2003 05:30 GMT
Comment 9Madgun6813-Oct-2003 05:32 GMT
Comment 10Anonymous13-Oct-2003 05:32 GMT
Comment 11Don CoxRegistered user13-Oct-2003 05:41 GMT
Comment 12Amon_ReRegistered user13-Oct-2003 05:46 GMT
Comment 13Rich Woods13-Oct-2003 05:49 GMT
Comment 14Rich Woods13-Oct-2003 05:51 GMT
Comment 15T_Bone13-Oct-2003 05:55 GMT
Comment 16Rich Woods13-Oct-2003 05:57 GMT
Comment 17Rich Woods13-Oct-2003 06:18 GMT
Comment 18T_Bone13-Oct-2003 06:25 GMT
Comment 19Rich Woods13-Oct-2003 06:36 GMT
Comment 20John13-Oct-2003 06:39 GMT
Comment 21Rich Woods13-Oct-2003 06:40 GMT
Comment 22Rich Woods13-Oct-2003 06:46 GMT
Comment 23T_Bone13-Oct-2003 06:47 GMT
Comment 24Emeric SH13-Oct-2003 07:00 GMT
Comment 25John13-Oct-2003 07:05 GMT
Comment 26Anonymous13-Oct-2003 07:31 GMT
Comment 27T_Bone13-Oct-2003 07:36 GMT
Comment 28Emeric SH13-Oct-2003 07:43 GMT
Comment 29T_Bone13-Oct-2003 07:53 GMT
Comment 30Wayne HuntRegistered user13-Oct-2003 08:07 GMT
Comment 31Wayne HuntRegistered user13-Oct-2003 08:16 GMT
Comment 32T_Bone13-Oct-2003 08:17 GMT
Comment 33Emeric SH13-Oct-2003 08:42 GMT
Comment 34T_Bone13-Oct-2003 09:14 GMT
Comment 35Lando13-Oct-2003 09:41 GMT
Comment 36T_Bone13-Oct-2003 09:49 GMT
Comment 37Anonymous13-Oct-2003 09:58 GMT
Comment 38Emeric SH13-Oct-2003 10:07 GMT
Comment 39Don CoxRegistered user13-Oct-2003 10:14 GMT
Comment 40Matt Parsons13-Oct-2003 10:31 GMT
Comment 41Bernie MeyerRegistered user13-Oct-2003 10:33 GMT
Comment 42Ann13-Oct-2003 15:27 GMT
Comment 43Ann13-Oct-2003 15:31 GMT
Comment 44Ann13-Oct-2003 15:38 GMT
Comment 45Ann13-Oct-2003 15:43 GMT
Comment 46Ann13-Oct-2003 15:44 GMT
Comment 47Coder13-Oct-2003 15:47 GMT
Comment 48Ann13-Oct-2003 15:53 GMT
Comment 49Rich Woods13-Oct-2003 15:55 GMT
Comment 50Rich Woods13-Oct-2003 16:20 GMT
Comment 51NihilVor13-Oct-2003 16:20 GMT
Comment 52Kjetil13-Oct-2003 17:16 GMT
Comment 53Rich Woods13-Oct-2003 17:38 GMT
Comment 54kevin orme13-Oct-2003 18:13 GMT
Comment 55Christian KempRegistered user13-Oct-2003 18:43 GMT
Comment 56John13-Oct-2003 18:43 GMT
Comment 57SlimJIm13-Oct-2003 19:03 GMT
Comment 583seas13-Oct-2003 19:56 GMT
Comment 59Ben13-Oct-2003 20:20 GMT
Comment 60T_Bone13-Oct-2003 22:36 GMT
Comment 61Rich Woods13-Oct-2003 23:27 GMT
Comment 62T_Bone13-Oct-2003 23:31 GMT
Comment 63Ann13-Oct-2003 23:41 GMT
Comment 64Ann13-Oct-2003 23:44 GMT
Comment 65EyeAm13-Oct-2003 23:48 GMT
Comment 66Anonymous13-Oct-2003 23:58 GMT
Comment 67T_Bone14-Oct-2003 00:13 GMT
Comment 68-14-Oct-2003 00:16 GMT
Comment 69MarkTime14-Oct-2003 00:21 GMT
Comment 70Rich Woods14-Oct-2003 00:25 GMT
Comment 71Rich Woods14-Oct-2003 00:27 GMT
Comment 72Rich Woods14-Oct-2003 00:38 GMT
Comment 73Rich Woods14-Oct-2003 00:45 GMT
Comment 74dammyRegistered user14-Oct-2003 03:13 GMT
Comment 75T_Bone14-Oct-2003 04:59 GMT
Comment 76Don CoxRegistered user14-Oct-2003 05:05 GMT
Comment 77Matt Parsons14-Oct-2003 07:59 GMT
Comment 78T_Bone14-Oct-2003 08:03 GMT
Comment 79Don CoxRegistered user14-Oct-2003 11:19 GMT
Comment 80DaveP14-Oct-2003 11:30 GMT
Comment 81Matt Parsons14-Oct-2003 11:48 GMT
Comment 82DaveP14-Oct-2003 11:51 GMT
Comment 83Matt Parsons14-Oct-2003 12:04 GMT
Comment 84DaveP14-Oct-2003 12:16 GMT
Comment 85T_Bone14-Oct-2003 12:48 GMT
Comment 86Rich Woods14-Oct-2003 13:57 GMT
Comment 87Rich Woods14-Oct-2003 13:59 GMT
Comment 88BrianK14-Oct-2003 14:16 GMT
Comment 89Don CoxRegistered user14-Oct-2003 14:22 GMT
Comment 90Rich Woods14-Oct-2003 14:50 GMT
Comment 91Rich Woods14-Oct-2003 15:07 GMT
Comment 92DaveP14-Oct-2003 15:58 GMT
Comment 93EyeAm14-Oct-2003 16:30 GMT
Comment 94Ann14-Oct-2003 17:27 GMT
Comment 95Ann14-Oct-2003 17:38 GMT
Comment 96dammyRegistered user14-Oct-2003 18:19 GMT
Comment 97Nate DownesRegistered user14-Oct-2003 18:28 GMT
Comment 98Rich Woods15-Oct-2003 00:38 GMT
Comment 99Rich Woods15-Oct-2003 00:45 GMT
Nova Design Obtains a Judgement of $270,000 against Ryan E. A. Czerwinski : Comment 100 of 108ANN.lu
Posted by Ann on 15-Oct-2003 01:19 GMT
In reply to Comment 97 (Nate Downes):
"Crown Victoria car problems? New one to me. (My wife wants to buy one, hence why the interest)"

Do a google search and find the material done by one of the news outfits. Its the cop car killer. They get rear ended and explode.
Jump...
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 101vortexau15-Oct-2003 05:09 GMT
Comment 102Don CoxRegistered user15-Oct-2003 05:51 GMT
Comment 103Bill Hoggett15-Oct-2003 13:13 GMT
Comment 104My Name is15-Oct-2003 14:15 GMT
Comment 105Bill Hoggett15-Oct-2003 15:27 GMT
Comment 106Vexar16-Oct-2003 18:17 GMT
Comment 107Nate DownesRegistered user16-Oct-2003 22:52 GMT
Comment 108extended17-Oct-2003 06:44 GMT
Back to Top