20-Apr-2024 03:36 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[News] Nova Design Obtains a Judgement of $270,000 against Ryan E. A. CzerwinskiANN.lu
Posted on 13-Oct-2003 06:03 GMT by Rich Woods108 comments
View flat
View list
After quite some time the court case of Nova Design vs. Ryan E. A. Czerwinski has been concluded with a default judgement.

Nova Design has obtained a judgement of $270,000 against Ryan E. A. Czerwinski. After quite some time the court case of Nova Design vs. Ryan E. A. Czerwinski has been concluded with a default judgement.

Nova Design has obtained a judgement of $270,000 against Ryan E. A. Czerwinski.

The judgement with interest and costs are now approx. $335,000+.

Court documentation can be found at merlanciabk

List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1James Carroll13-Oct-2003 04:07 GMT
Comment 2Rich Woods13-Oct-2003 04:09 GMT
Comment 3Anonymous13-Oct-2003 04:16 GMT
Comment 4EyeAm13-Oct-2003 04:38 GMT
Comment 5Anonymous13-Oct-2003 04:43 GMT
Comment 6EyeAm13-Oct-2003 04:47 GMT
Comment 7Anonymous13-Oct-2003 05:25 GMT
Comment 8Anonymous13-Oct-2003 05:30 GMT
Comment 9Madgun6813-Oct-2003 05:32 GMT
Comment 10Anonymous13-Oct-2003 05:32 GMT
Comment 11Don CoxRegistered user13-Oct-2003 05:41 GMT
Comment 12Amon_ReRegistered user13-Oct-2003 05:46 GMT
Comment 13Rich Woods13-Oct-2003 05:49 GMT
Comment 14Rich Woods13-Oct-2003 05:51 GMT
Comment 15T_Bone13-Oct-2003 05:55 GMT
Comment 16Rich Woods13-Oct-2003 05:57 GMT
Comment 17Rich Woods13-Oct-2003 06:18 GMT
Comment 18T_Bone13-Oct-2003 06:25 GMT
Nova Design Obtains a Judgement of $270,000 against Ryan E. A. Czerwinski : Comment 19 of 108ANN.lu
Posted by Rich Woods on 13-Oct-2003 06:36 GMT
In reply to Comment 18 (T_Bone):
Posted by T_Bone (24.241.148.80) on 13-Oct-2003 08:25:35

In Reply to Comment 17:
Bill insinuated he knew who stole the german inventory, did he mean Ryan all along? Supposedly Ryan "confiscated" the german inventory because Amiga never paid back the loan?
-------------------
Bill DIDN'T insinuate anything - here is his quote - he was quite DEFINATE in his choice of words......


Speech at AmiWest - July

And now we've got some other issues. And I'm gonna bring them up to all
you guys to let you know there's a change happening in Amiga. Amiga is
being ripped off. It has been ripped off since before I got here and
during the time. We have people who have stolen our Intellectual Property,
we have people who write us very large checks that are no good, we have
people who publicly go out and lie about us, and we've been very patient,
we've sat back, we've allowed them to say what they wanna say without
rebuttal, you haven't seen us out there, on the web boards and message
boards saying things. We have a situation creating an Amiga museum, with a
lot of hardware that was ours that we owned that was in Germany. We went
to go get it. The warehouse was empty. Pallets and pallets of our product
had been stolen. Now, we know who has it, we're not gonna... that's...
we're not here to point fingers or names or let people know, we even know
where it is. We also know this other group that's gonna make an
announcement they're making a museum, Well, guess what, that's our stuff.
We paid for it. We paid millions of dollars for this. And while we sat
back, we tried to be the nice guy and tried to work through these issues,
we have product... we have people out there right now using our
trademarks, using our boing ball, using the Amiga name without authority,
and again, we've been the nice guys. We look at them, say "hey, please
stop", "please stop", "hey, we asked you nicely, stop!" Well, guess what,
I'm tired of it. I know you're tired of it because you guys send me
e-mails. I get a counselling from you guys saying "did you see this, did
you see that?", and we send them a very nice note. Well, notice is now
given. Making it very clear, as of September 1st, 2002, that's your
decision day, you either get legal or we will shut you down. Nobody is
gonna steal from us any further. We have out there people using our source
code, illegally, and that steals from everything we're trying to do.
People have got our hardware, that's gonna stop. The lawyers are lined up,
they're fully paid, and they're waiting. So this is public notice, we're
not gonna say who these people are, there's software out there right now
that is illegal. People have paid for software that is illegal. We're not
gonna come after any one of you, this is not your problem, it's our
problem, and now I have taken it extremely personally. So when you see
people out there saying things on message boards that are lies, I'm coming
after them. I'm sick of it. I haven't spent two years of my life, and all
the money I've ever had, to sit here and deal with these... this nonsense.
They have people stand publicly and... and blaspheme one and other out
there, only catch us in the middle, never again folks. So if you're one of
these people, you'd better have a signed contract that's legal with us,
because as of September 1st you will be served. And we're not serving fun
here, we will shut you down. I will shut down your company. Because
you've violated our IP, you have harmed Amiga, and you've done nothing but
screw with every person in this room by lying. So I'm making it clear...
I hope... Does anyone not understand what I just said? How many people
understand what I just said? [faint applause] OK, it's time to get...
It's time to get ugly. I was just meeting with a friend of ours in the
military, he says "so what you're saying is 'take no prisoners'?" I said
"yeah, this is gonna be war done". Because there... Enough of this, we're
done.

---------------

When he mentioned the case that was not able to be opend Ryan shoouted "The key was in the case" - this can be clearly heard on the tape I have of the speech.


Somebody *HAS* to write a book. Makes "Pirates of Silicon Valley" look absolutely DULL by comparison.

One reason why The World of Merlancia, LLC is incorporated here in AZ.
Jump...
#23 T_Bone #26 Anonymous #65 EyeAm
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 20John13-Oct-2003 06:39 GMT
Comment 21Rich Woods13-Oct-2003 06:40 GMT
Comment 22Rich Woods13-Oct-2003 06:46 GMT
Comment 23T_Bone13-Oct-2003 06:47 GMT
Comment 24Emeric SH13-Oct-2003 07:00 GMT
Comment 25John13-Oct-2003 07:05 GMT
Comment 26Anonymous13-Oct-2003 07:31 GMT
Comment 27T_Bone13-Oct-2003 07:36 GMT
Comment 28Emeric SH13-Oct-2003 07:43 GMT
Comment 29T_Bone13-Oct-2003 07:53 GMT
Comment 30Wayne HuntRegistered user13-Oct-2003 08:07 GMT
Comment 31Wayne HuntRegistered user13-Oct-2003 08:16 GMT
Comment 32T_Bone13-Oct-2003 08:17 GMT
Comment 33Emeric SH13-Oct-2003 08:42 GMT
Comment 34T_Bone13-Oct-2003 09:14 GMT
Comment 35Lando13-Oct-2003 09:41 GMT
Comment 36T_Bone13-Oct-2003 09:49 GMT
Comment 37Anonymous13-Oct-2003 09:58 GMT
Comment 38Emeric SH13-Oct-2003 10:07 GMT
Comment 39Don CoxRegistered user13-Oct-2003 10:14 GMT
Comment 40Matt Parsons13-Oct-2003 10:31 GMT
Comment 41Bernie MeyerRegistered user13-Oct-2003 10:33 GMT
Comment 42Ann13-Oct-2003 15:27 GMT
Comment 43Ann13-Oct-2003 15:31 GMT
Comment 44Ann13-Oct-2003 15:38 GMT
Comment 45Ann13-Oct-2003 15:43 GMT
Comment 46Ann13-Oct-2003 15:44 GMT
Comment 47Coder13-Oct-2003 15:47 GMT
Comment 48Ann13-Oct-2003 15:53 GMT
Comment 49Rich Woods13-Oct-2003 15:55 GMT
Comment 50Rich Woods13-Oct-2003 16:20 GMT
Comment 51NihilVor13-Oct-2003 16:20 GMT
Comment 52Kjetil13-Oct-2003 17:16 GMT
Comment 53Rich Woods13-Oct-2003 17:38 GMT
Comment 54kevin orme13-Oct-2003 18:13 GMT
Comment 55Christian KempRegistered user13-Oct-2003 18:43 GMT
Comment 56John13-Oct-2003 18:43 GMT
Comment 57SlimJIm13-Oct-2003 19:03 GMT
Comment 583seas13-Oct-2003 19:56 GMT
Comment 59Ben13-Oct-2003 20:20 GMT
Comment 60T_Bone13-Oct-2003 22:36 GMT
Comment 61Rich Woods13-Oct-2003 23:27 GMT
Comment 62T_Bone13-Oct-2003 23:31 GMT
Comment 63Ann13-Oct-2003 23:41 GMT
Comment 64Ann13-Oct-2003 23:44 GMT
Comment 65EyeAm13-Oct-2003 23:48 GMT
Comment 66Anonymous13-Oct-2003 23:58 GMT
Comment 67T_Bone14-Oct-2003 00:13 GMT
Comment 68-14-Oct-2003 00:16 GMT
Comment 69MarkTime14-Oct-2003 00:21 GMT
Comment 70Rich Woods14-Oct-2003 00:25 GMT
Comment 71Rich Woods14-Oct-2003 00:27 GMT
Comment 72Rich Woods14-Oct-2003 00:38 GMT
Comment 73Rich Woods14-Oct-2003 00:45 GMT
Comment 74dammyRegistered user14-Oct-2003 03:13 GMT
Comment 75T_Bone14-Oct-2003 04:59 GMT
Comment 76Don CoxRegistered user14-Oct-2003 05:05 GMT
Comment 77Matt Parsons14-Oct-2003 07:59 GMT
Comment 78T_Bone14-Oct-2003 08:03 GMT
Comment 79Don CoxRegistered user14-Oct-2003 11:19 GMT
Comment 80DaveP14-Oct-2003 11:30 GMT
Comment 81Matt Parsons14-Oct-2003 11:48 GMT
Comment 82DaveP14-Oct-2003 11:51 GMT
Comment 83Matt Parsons14-Oct-2003 12:04 GMT
Comment 84DaveP14-Oct-2003 12:16 GMT
Comment 85T_Bone14-Oct-2003 12:48 GMT
Comment 86Rich Woods14-Oct-2003 13:57 GMT
Comment 87Rich Woods14-Oct-2003 13:59 GMT
Comment 88BrianK14-Oct-2003 14:16 GMT
Comment 89Don CoxRegistered user14-Oct-2003 14:22 GMT
Comment 90Rich Woods14-Oct-2003 14:50 GMT
Comment 91Rich Woods14-Oct-2003 15:07 GMT
Comment 92DaveP14-Oct-2003 15:58 GMT
Comment 93EyeAm14-Oct-2003 16:30 GMT
Comment 94Ann14-Oct-2003 17:27 GMT
Comment 95Ann14-Oct-2003 17:38 GMT
Comment 96dammyRegistered user14-Oct-2003 18:19 GMT
Comment 97Nate DownesRegistered user14-Oct-2003 18:28 GMT
Comment 98Rich Woods15-Oct-2003 00:38 GMT
Comment 99Rich Woods15-Oct-2003 00:45 GMT
Comment 100Ann15-Oct-2003 01:19 GMT
Comment 101vortexau15-Oct-2003 05:09 GMT
Comment 102Don CoxRegistered user15-Oct-2003 05:51 GMT
Comment 103Bill Hoggett15-Oct-2003 13:13 GMT
Comment 104My Name is15-Oct-2003 14:15 GMT
Comment 105Bill Hoggett15-Oct-2003 15:27 GMT
Comment 106Vexar16-Oct-2003 18:17 GMT
Comment 107Nate DownesRegistered user16-Oct-2003 22:52 GMT
Comment 108extended17-Oct-2003 06:44 GMT
Back to Top