20-Apr-2024 10:29 GMT.		 UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[Files] PNG icons with WB3.5 & 3.9ANN.lu
Posted on 20-Oct-2003 15:00 GMT by Amon_Re34 comments
View flat
View list
Elena Novaretti has produced a superb PNG icon patch for OS 3.5/3.9 which lets you use PNG icons, like those in Morph OS.

Download PowerIcons. (Info found on aw.net)

List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1Amon_ReRegistered user20-Oct-2003 13:00 GMT
Comment 2Bill Hoggett20-Oct-2003 13:15 GMT
Comment 3Peter Gordon20-Oct-2003 13:24 GMT
Comment 4Anonymous20-Oct-2003 13:42 GMT
Comment 5Anonymous20-Oct-2003 13:47 GMT
Comment 6takemehomegrandmaRegistered user20-Oct-2003 14:46 GMT
Comment 7Amon_ReRegistered user20-Oct-2003 14:55 GMT
Comment 8Kjetil20-Oct-2003 17:21 GMT
Comment 9Amon_ReRegistered user20-Oct-2003 17:26 GMT
Comment 10Kjetil20-Oct-2003 18:49 GMT
Comment 11itix20-Oct-2003 18:57 GMT
Comment 12Kjetil20-Oct-2003 19:12 GMT
Comment 13Roj20-Oct-2003 19:33 GMT
Comment 14Tony20-Oct-2003 19:34 GMT
Comment 15IamCleverToo20-Oct-2003 23:51 GMT
Comment 16Hagge21-Oct-2003 02:15 GMT
Comment 17Amon_ReRegistered user21-Oct-2003 02:38 GMT
Comment 18Amon_ReRegistered user21-Oct-2003 02:39 GMT
PNG icons with WB3.5 & 3.9 : Comment 19 of 34ANN.lu
Posted by Seldon on 21-Oct-2003 05:16 GMT
In reply to Comment 9 (Amon_Re):
Actually, the fact that libraries will have both the old jump-table and the new system, means that old 68k programs will be able to work with NEW PPC libraries. Old 68k libraries should work as always too. Though PowerIcons is another matter. Since it uses most likely the SetFunction() API call to patch the icon.library, we must wait and see if it'll work with the new PPC (I presume) icon.library that will come with OS4 (besides I've heared SetFunction() will change as well). Anyway... that patch is nice and well down, 256 colour icons are ugly on 16/24 desktops. I hope OS4 team will add such functionality or will add PowerIcons' patch as default.
Jump...
#21 Anonymous
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 20Anonymous21-Oct-2003 10:49 GMT
Comment 21Anonymous21-Oct-2003 10:56 GMT
Comment 22Kjetil21-Oct-2003 12:35 GMT
Comment 23Huh!?21-Oct-2003 14:19 GMT
Comment 24Georg Steger21-Oct-2003 14:28 GMT
Comment 25Kjetil21-Oct-2003 16:36 GMT
Comment 26Georg Steger21-Oct-2003 18:32 GMT
Comment 27nasu21-Oct-2003 19:49 GMT
Comment 28Huh!?21-Oct-2003 19:52 GMT
Comment 29Damo Eurock21-Oct-2003 23:42 GMT
Comment 30Anonymous22-Oct-2003 10:01 GMT
Comment 31Anonymous22-Oct-2003 10:32 GMT
Comment 32StAn22-Oct-2003 15:56 GMT
Comment 33StAn22-Oct-2003 17:36 GMT
Comment 34Anonymous22-Oct-2003 23:17 GMT
Back to Top