08-Jul-2020 04:26 GMT.
[Rant] 2oo4 is starting to look goodANN.lu
Posted on 26-Oct-2003 09:18 GMT by Hagge66 comments
View flat
View list
Will 2004 be the return of Amiga? It all looks quite intresting really. Press more ;) To begin with there are two companies out there who actually seem to be able to deliver, this have not happened for over 10 years for any single company so only that is impressive. Would be great if they didn't compete and instead corporated thought.

Anyway, first we have Genesi which has already released both the computer and the os, they attract new developers and other oses aswell which gives the platform added value, the Pegasos2 price is quite ok, the hardware is good enough and the upgrade options from Pegasos to Pegasos2 is a nice move against their users. MorphOS seems to develop well, and in the very short feature the computers will probably run Linux, OpenBSD, OpenBEOS, QNX, AROS and maybe even more OSes. The only trouble as I see it is that there are still quite little documentation, and more of that kind would be good for helping users who want to develop for the os or attract new developers.

Secondly we have Amiga Inc, the AmigaOnes have been delivered since long, thought a bit expensive imho. Hopefully the mini-itx AmigaOne will be cheaper and the board might attract people from outside which want a PPC cpu instead of Via. I think Amiga Inc and Eyetech would benefit in this if they attracted other than Amiga-users aswell.
Hyperion seems to have done a great job with AmigaOS4, it's not like the AmigaOS3.5 and 3.9 was (to me it always seemed like the regular AmigaOS 3.1 with a bunch of included freeware patches), they have managed to improve AmigaOS in many areas, the new GUI looks awesome and more modern than the old one. Thought I haven't seen how it runs on PPC since the first tests it seems like they are moving it over at a fast rate and we have seen various Amiga-apps actually running and working on it. Hopefully we can finally have see a release in the not to distant future of the first real new AmigaOS for over 10 years. I've heard Hyperion are writing some kind of reference manual for it aswell which is great. The only suggestions here is to try to make the AmigaOne boards a little more affordable and also get the AmigaOS4 to run on the pegasos to gain more users and therefor more applications and publicity.

Then we have AROS, I don't know which current state they would put themself in, something like the OpenBEOS teams roadmap/timeline/whatever would be appreciated. Anyway as I've understand it the OS is quite usable now and the only problem is to get more applications since m68k applications wont run? or?

Anyway, with the possibility of growth in the Genesi camp, cheaper AmigaOnes together with a release of AmigaOS4 and even more progress from the AROS people 2004 is starting to look like a good year. Something which would be cool and might help anyone is if some company was intrested to make an IDE which can compile programs for all of the OSes, thought I don't know how big chances for that to work are. As I understand it all of the got GCC running and MUI should work on them, so why not? Since we got a small split here and the current Amiga user base is quite small something like this would be needed. An easier route would of course be to have both of the OSes running on both of the platforms, and the best solution would of course be if the companies could try to corporate and agree on similair features but i don't see that comming :/. Hopefully time will solve this issue.

Anyway great work all of you and a happy 2004 =P

List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1Hagge26-Oct-2003 08:23 GMT
Comment 2Kronos26-Oct-2003 08:30 GMT
Comment 3Hagge26-Oct-2003 08:39 GMT
Comment 4Kronos26-Oct-2003 08:44 GMT
Comment 5happy clown26-Oct-2003 08:48 GMT
Comment 6Kronos26-Oct-2003 08:52 GMT
Comment 7Anonymous26-Oct-2003 08:58 GMT
Comment 8JoannaK26-Oct-2003 09:13 GMT
Comment 9Don CoxRegistered user26-Oct-2003 09:48 GMT
Comment 10Anonymous26-Oct-2003 10:27 GMT
Comment 11Raffaele26-Oct-2003 10:35 GMT
Comment 12Don CoxRegistered user26-Oct-2003 10:54 GMT
Comment 13Jimbo26-Oct-2003 11:51 GMT
Comment 14Alex Klauke26-Oct-2003 12:09 GMT
Comment 15pixie26-Oct-2003 12:29 GMT
Comment 16dammyRegistered user26-Oct-2003 13:42 GMT
Comment 17Bill Hoggett26-Oct-2003 14:26 GMT
Comment 18MarkTime26-Oct-2003 14:52 GMT
Comment 19Olegil26-Oct-2003 15:57 GMT
Comment 20JP26-Oct-2003 16:28 GMT
Comment 21Don CoxRegistered user26-Oct-2003 16:42 GMT
Comment 22doofus26-Oct-2003 16:42 GMT
Comment 23Pentrite26-Oct-2003 17:02 GMT
Comment 24sutro26-Oct-2003 17:08 GMT
Comment 25Bill Hoggett26-Oct-2003 17:43 GMT
Comment 26Anonymous26-Oct-2003 18:08 GMT
Comment 27MarkTime26-Oct-2003 18:16 GMT
Comment 28Rich Woods26-Oct-2003 19:04 GMT
Comment 29Jimbo26-Oct-2003 19:42 GMT
Comment 30MarkTime26-Oct-2003 21:09 GMT
Comment 31Bill Hoggett26-Oct-2003 21:23 GMT
Comment 32JoannaK26-Oct-2003 21:28 GMT
Comment 33Anonymous27-Oct-2003 01:17 GMT
Comment 34pixie27-Oct-2003 01:29 GMT
Comment 35-27-Oct-2003 01:56 GMT
Comment 36hammer27-Oct-2003 02:09 GMT
Comment 37Vexar27-Oct-2003 03:27 GMT
Comment 38Rich Woods27-Oct-2003 06:13 GMT
Comment 39Olegil27-Oct-2003 06:25 GMT
Comment 40Olegil27-Oct-2003 06:31 GMT
Comment 41Don CoxRegistered user27-Oct-2003 06:47 GMT
Comment 42Anonymous27-Oct-2003 07:18 GMT
Comment 43Bill Hoggett27-Oct-2003 09:08 GMT
Comment 44Rassilon AKA Lewis Brunton27-Oct-2003 11:59 GMT
Comment 45Don CoxRegistered user27-Oct-2003 15:48 GMT
Comment 46Rassilon AKA Lewis Brunton27-Oct-2003 15:51 GMT
Comment 47dammyRegistered user27-Oct-2003 16:07 GMT
Comment 48Anonymous27-Oct-2003 16:21 GMT
Comment 49dammyRegistered user27-Oct-2003 16:25 GMT
Comment 50Nate DownesRegistered user27-Oct-2003 17:02 GMT
Comment 51Anonymous27-Oct-2003 20:23 GMT
Comment 52-27-Oct-2003 21:01 GMT
Comment 53Bill Hoggett27-Oct-2003 21:21 GMT
Comment 54Jason27-Oct-2003 21:36 GMT
Comment 55Anonymous27-Oct-2003 22:51 GMT
Comment 56Anonymous27-Oct-2003 22:54 GMT
Comment 57Jason28-Oct-2003 08:25 GMT
Comment 58pixie28-Oct-2003 09:06 GMT
Comment 59Bill Hoggett28-Oct-2003 10:25 GMT
Comment 60T_Bone28-Oct-2003 13:49 GMT
Comment 61vortexau28-Oct-2003 14:21 GMT
Comment 62dammyRegistered user28-Oct-2003 14:28 GMT
Comment 63vortexau28-Oct-2003 14:40 GMT
Comment 64Bill Hoggett28-Oct-2003 16:23 GMT
Comment 65dammyRegistered user28-Oct-2003 16:45 GMT
Comment 66T_Bone28-Oct-2003 17:02 GMT
Back to Top