27-Nov-2021 18:07 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[Web] NCSCAUG Interview with OmniscienceANN.lu
Posted on 07-Nov-2003 19:55 GMT by Tony Gore37 comments
View flat
View list
The NC/SC Amiga User Group presents an interview with developer Jim Wingard of Omniscience. The interview outlines the process of becoming an AmigaDE developer, the software development cycle, as well as his take on AmigaDE in general. Read the full interview ...
List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1Anonymous07-Nov-2003 19:15 GMT
Comment 2Tony Gore07-Nov-2003 19:28 GMT
Comment 3Tigger07-Nov-2003 21:15 GMT
Comment 4Tony Gore07-Nov-2003 23:08 GMT
Comment 5Tigger08-Nov-2003 00:14 GMT
Comment 6Tony Gore08-Nov-2003 00:34 GMT
Comment 7Tigger08-Nov-2003 05:15 GMT
Comment 8Douglas McLaughlin08-Nov-2003 05:46 GMT
Comment 9Tigger08-Nov-2003 06:13 GMT
Comment 10samface08-Nov-2003 06:49 GMT
Comment 11Kronos08-Nov-2003 07:29 GMT
Comment 12Purist08-Nov-2003 10:35 GMT
Comment 13samface08-Nov-2003 11:04 GMT
Comment 14Kronos08-Nov-2003 11:08 GMT
Comment 15samface08-Nov-2003 11:17 GMT
Comment 16samface08-Nov-2003 11:20 GMT
Comment 17itix08-Nov-2003 11:46 GMT
Comment 18Kronos08-Nov-2003 11:54 GMT
NCSCAUG Interview with Omniscience : Comment 19 of 37ANN.lu
Posted by Purist on 08-Nov-2003 12:02 GMT
In reply to Comment 15 (samface):
>>Simple, they have their own agenda to make money and put it in first place.

>Congratulations! You just earned yourself a degree in economics.

>Seriously, they are a business rather than some form of charity organization, >of course they will do what makes the most business sense! What did you >expect, free beer?

There was no investmente from them that was necessary.
So I'd expect them to support the users by letting the 3rd party companies continue AmigaOS, at that time (when they announced AmigaOS dead).

>...However, when several third parties offered to do the work for them, they agreed to license the technology so that third parties could continue the classic line of products while they keep their focus on the next generation technology.

No. Please get your facts rigth! That allowed third party developers to continue AmigaOS when they saw that they couldn't modify TAOS' intent to have memory protection. AmigaDe over AmigaOS is supposed to have that.
So again, it wasn't "for the users".

> You can whine about this strategy all you want but I don't think you will accomplish anything but look really childish.

Childish?!! So you don't think that people that have dedicated so much time to the platform and see the company screwing it all up because of their own agenda, when they could have simply let other companies continue supporting it have a right to say something?

Don't get me wrong I'm talking about the situation as in 2000 (or close) when they announced AmigaOS dead. They screwed it. AmigaOS developers just got away.
There sure was a lack of product responsability too, but had they let 3rd parties continue the OS the the time, I don't think we would be in the situation we are now.

So forgive me if I sound too hash, but the thing is, after what they've done (or didn't), it just seems too much hypocrisy to hear people saying something along the lines of "we're giving AmigaOS back to the users, allowing 3rd parties to continue the OS" or something.

Companies can do whatever they want to with what they own, but their actions, specially towards customers/users are pretty much the normal relations of normall Joe's. If they screwed you once you shouldn't trust them till they prove the contrary.
Jump...
#21 samface
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 20itix08-Nov-2003 12:56 GMT
Comment 21samface08-Nov-2003 13:51 GMT
Comment 22itix08-Nov-2003 14:53 GMT
Comment 23Don CoxRegistered user08-Nov-2003 17:17 GMT
Comment 24Purist08-Nov-2003 18:30 GMT
Comment 25Tigger09-Nov-2003 05:51 GMT
Comment 26samface09-Nov-2003 11:21 GMT
Comment 27samface09-Nov-2003 11:36 GMT
Comment 28samface09-Nov-2003 11:56 GMT
Comment 29Kjetil09-Nov-2003 13:06 GMT
Comment 30samface09-Nov-2003 13:34 GMT
Comment 31Tony Gore09-Nov-2003 13:36 GMT
Comment 32itix09-Nov-2003 14:19 GMT
Comment 33Tigger10-Nov-2003 03:37 GMT
Comment 34Purist10-Nov-2003 10:20 GMT
Comment 35Tony Gore10-Nov-2003 11:25 GMT
Comment 36samface10-Nov-2003 12:12 GMT
Comment 37Anonymous13-Nov-2003 19:57 GMT
Back to Top