27-Nov-2021 17:07 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[Web] NCSCAUG Interview with OmniscienceANN.lu
Posted on 07-Nov-2003 19:55 GMT by Tony Gore37 comments
View flat
View list
The NC/SC Amiga User Group presents an interview with developer Jim Wingard of Omniscience. The interview outlines the process of becoming an AmigaDE developer, the software development cycle, as well as his take on AmigaDE in general. Read the full interview ...
List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1Anonymous07-Nov-2003 19:15 GMT
Comment 2Tony Gore07-Nov-2003 19:28 GMT
Comment 3Tigger07-Nov-2003 21:15 GMT
Comment 4Tony Gore07-Nov-2003 23:08 GMT
Comment 5Tigger08-Nov-2003 00:14 GMT
Comment 6Tony Gore08-Nov-2003 00:34 GMT
NCSCAUG Interview with Omniscience : Comment 7 of 37ANN.lu
Posted by Tigger on 08-Nov-2003 05:15 GMT
In reply to Comment 6 (Tony Gore):
>>>>
For just once, could somebody read something and take some value away from the content, instead of trying to make it into a "slag Amiga Inc" contest??? Whatever happened to people with some intelligent input to share? This was a good and informative piece and you and the first anonymous troll try to turn these peoples hard work into a "joke", just for the sake of stabbing at Amiga. If you are not interested in AmigaDE or the development process, please move along to the next article. It really is that simple. Replies are not necessary.
>>>>

I took some value away from it, and I think everyone should take value away from it. My issue is that you article is likely to encourage others to work on DE. I'm not making fun of any of the people who have worked or are working on DE applications, I've played with all of the currently available applictions, and I bought at least 6 copies of the SDK for me and my programmers. My issue is that Fleecy and Gary are out there talking to developers like your friend about buying SDKs, and investing months of their time with promises of sales and financial returns. So far that hasnt happened. We have talks about sellout of the Game Paks from Fleecy, yet no money for the people who wrote the content for those Game Paks (including your friend). Microsoft doesnt owe Amiga Inc for the Game Paks, why does Amiga Inc still owe the developers?? I've had these conversations with people who were going to get paid by Amiga Inc in June, then July, then August for software that Amiga Inc sold last year or early this year. All the while Amiga Inc has been encouraging them to get their next piece of software done for the deal with Sendo or Microsoft or whoever else is the current "hot for DE" company of the month. Developers have the right to know whether Amiga Inc is paying the people writing the DE applications that Amiga is currently selling, especially since currently thats the only way DE developers can make money from DE.
-Tig
Jump...
#8 Douglas McLaughlin
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 8Douglas McLaughlin08-Nov-2003 05:46 GMT
Comment 9Tigger08-Nov-2003 06:13 GMT
Comment 10samface08-Nov-2003 06:49 GMT
Comment 11Kronos08-Nov-2003 07:29 GMT
Comment 12Purist08-Nov-2003 10:35 GMT
Comment 13samface08-Nov-2003 11:04 GMT
Comment 14Kronos08-Nov-2003 11:08 GMT
Comment 15samface08-Nov-2003 11:17 GMT
Comment 16samface08-Nov-2003 11:20 GMT
Comment 17itix08-Nov-2003 11:46 GMT
Comment 18Kronos08-Nov-2003 11:54 GMT
Comment 19Purist08-Nov-2003 12:02 GMT
Comment 20itix08-Nov-2003 12:56 GMT
Comment 21samface08-Nov-2003 13:51 GMT
Comment 22itix08-Nov-2003 14:53 GMT
Comment 23Don CoxRegistered user08-Nov-2003 17:17 GMT
Comment 24Purist08-Nov-2003 18:30 GMT
Comment 25Tigger09-Nov-2003 05:51 GMT
Comment 26samface09-Nov-2003 11:21 GMT
Comment 27samface09-Nov-2003 11:36 GMT
Comment 28samface09-Nov-2003 11:56 GMT
Comment 29Kjetil09-Nov-2003 13:06 GMT
Comment 30samface09-Nov-2003 13:34 GMT
Comment 31Tony Gore09-Nov-2003 13:36 GMT
Comment 32itix09-Nov-2003 14:19 GMT
Comment 33Tigger10-Nov-2003 03:37 GMT
Comment 34Purist10-Nov-2003 10:20 GMT
Comment 35Tony Gore10-Nov-2003 11:25 GMT
Comment 36samface10-Nov-2003 12:12 GMT
Comment 37Anonymous13-Nov-2003 19:57 GMT
Back to Top