[News] Are MorphOS users geeky enough? | ANN.lu |
Posted on 12-Nov-2003 22:32 GMT by tokai | 75 comments View flat View list |
Maybe you remember the saying "The 'M' in Morphos stands for 'geek'!" ?
Yes, it's true and we MorphOS users are much more geeky than the other geeks from Linux and Co. Sadly it hasn't been possible for us ubergeeks
to enjoy a port of the ultimative geektool of the known universe
simply because nobody of us so called ubergeeks ported the damn thing.
I'm talking about MLdonkey. :)
But good news!!! A few months ago we locked CISC into a dingy cellar and
told him he couldn't come out until he finished the Objective-Caml port,
which was a required and important step for porting MLdonkey. We
haven't heard from him for a very long time, and we couldn't be bothered to
check. But all of a sudden he emerged from his dark dungeon.
Fortunately (or maybe I should better say: unfortunately ;) he had
finished OCaml and surprisingly also MLdonkey.
If you find CISC then thank him for this nifty port, sadly when I last saw
him he was running away screaming 'THE DARKNESS CONSUMES US! WE ARE ONE
WITH THE VOID!'.
Well, actually we've done this releases just for fun. The port is not
finished, it still misses a GUI (hey, isn't this more geeky than the Linux
version? Isn't it?). Also most of the 'Bonus' stuff was more or less been
done in a very creepy and probably unusabl... i mean geeky way. We're
still on the lookout for someone with some actual talent, so that we can all
kick back and boss him around. So if for some insane reason you wish
to volunteer in coding the MUI GUI then try to catch CISC on IRC or via
eMail, else don't bother him or he will run away again.
Anyway, here you find out more.
WE ARE SO GEEKY! WHOOHOO! :)
|
|
List of all comments to this article |
Are MorphOS users geeky enough? : Comment 60 of 75 | ANN.lu |
Posted by Darrin on 13-Nov-2003 15:43 GMT | In reply to Comment 57 (gary_c): Sheesh, here we go again...
>You thought that comment would upset me?
No, I wasn't even paying attention to the name of the poster when I commented.
>Sorry, I used to work with "deprived" kids for a living so a) I'm used to
>adolescent dysfunction and b) it takes more than that kind of comment to
>upset me.
Get a sense of humour.
>Now, urinating on my cornflakes -- that probably would have done it.
Ah, you found one!!!
>As for your comment, it just makes me wonder why people take the time to
>write something that's calculated to cause bad feelings;
It was "calculated" to make you smile.
>you know the smiley doesn't really wipe away the impression.
Then you'd better learn to understand what the "smiley" is for and stop being so paranoid.
>It's hard to believe you once wanted to "end the flamewars".
I still do. I've fanned no flames here.
>Was that really you? Anyway,
Yes.
>I think we're feeling pretty good about how things are going,
Who are "we"? You and Rich Woods?
>so you'll really have to come up with something more devestating (to others,
>not self-inflicted as is the trend so far) to put a dent in anybody's day.
I wasn't trying to "dent anybody's day". You really need to lighten up.... before I come around and urinate on your cornflakes. ;-) |
|
List of all comments to this article (continued) |
|
- User Menu
-
- About ANN archives
- The ANN archives is powered by #AmigaZeux. It was updated daily (news last: 22-Oct-2004; comments last: 18-May-2005).
ANN.lu was created, previously owned and maintained by Christian Kemp, www.ckemp.com.
- Contribute
- Not possible at this time!
- Search ANN archives
- Advanced search
- Hosting
- ANN.lu was hosted by Dreamhost. Sign up through this link, mention "ckemp" as referrer and he will get a 10% commission on any account you purchase.
Please show your appreciation for any past, present and future work on ANN.lu by making a contribution via PayPal.
|