29-Mar-2024 05:39 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[News] The COMPLETE civil docket for Thendic Electronics, et al v. Amiga IncANN.lu
Posted on 14-Nov-2003 21:02 GMT by samface99 comments
View flat
View list
You can find the COMPLETE civil docket for the Thendic Electronics, et al v. Amiga Inc court case here. These files has been retrieved through the Public Access to Court Electronic Records (PACER) system and has been reproduced as a whole and completely as published in the Case Management/Electronic Case Files system on U.S. District Court Western District of Washington's website.
List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1Matt Parsons14-Nov-2003 20:53 GMT
Comment 2Tigger14-Nov-2003 20:54 GMT
Comment 3samface14-Nov-2003 21:15 GMT
Comment 4samface14-Nov-2003 21:19 GMT
Comment 5CnlPepper14-Nov-2003 21:27 GMT
Comment 6TheRealNapsterRegistered user14-Nov-2003 21:45 GMT
Comment 7IanSRegistered user14-Nov-2003 22:06 GMT
Comment 8Nate DownesRegistered user14-Nov-2003 22:24 GMT
Comment 9Darrin14-Nov-2003 22:29 GMT
Comment 10Darrin14-Nov-2003 22:38 GMT
Comment 11Anonymous14-Nov-2003 22:39 GMT
Comment 12smithy14-Nov-2003 22:58 GMT
Comment 13Anonymous14-Nov-2003 23:19 GMT
Comment 14Rob14-Nov-2003 23:30 GMT
Comment 15Alkis TsapanidisRegistered user14-Nov-2003 23:33 GMT
Comment 16Darrin14-Nov-2003 23:40 GMT
Comment 17Tigger14-Nov-2003 23:48 GMT
Comment 18JoannaK14-Nov-2003 23:51 GMT
Comment 19Eva14-Nov-2003 23:55 GMT
Comment 20TheRealNapsterRegistered user15-Nov-2003 00:09 GMT
The COMPLETE civil docket for Thendic Electronics, et al v. Amiga Inc : Comment 21 of 99ANN.lu
Posted by Darrin on 15-Nov-2003 00:33 GMT
In reply to Comment 18 (JoannaK):
>Well. that original Deal was signed allmost exactly three years ago. If they
>were having business (or interest) back then.. Must have been a long project.

The fact that this deal was made three years ago means nothing to the scenarios I described. It simply reveals that a certain party has had a long time interest in aquiring the rights to the Amiga trademarks through the DE product. In fact, back then we were all getting excited about purchasing "powered by Amiga" PDA's running DE. However, this product was as much vapour as the fabled BoXeR. My question now is, was there EVER going to be an AmigaDE PDA or was this simply part of the bait set to trap Amiga Inc?

Also, this isn't the only long-term plan that has come to light. The whole campaign of misinformation and "turning" existing Amiga supporters into "blue camp followers" has been going on longer than that. One by one, active advocates for the AmigaOne/OS4/DE have been targeted, courted and subverted. Sometimes they were left in place in order to conduct subversive operations against Amiga Inc and it's partners until they were finally allowed to reveal their true "colours" and stand openly in the ranks of their fellow co-conspirators.

You should know this only too well. How long were you under orders to maintain your presence in the AmigaOne mailing lists until you were told you could make a strategic retreat to the next "firing position"?
Jump...
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 22stricq15-Nov-2003 00:52 GMT
Comment 23Rob15-Nov-2003 00:54 GMT
Comment 24Lando15-Nov-2003 02:55 GMT
Comment 25Anonymous15-Nov-2003 03:29 GMT
Comment 26willey15-Nov-2003 04:00 GMT
Comment 27Tigger15-Nov-2003 04:39 GMT
Comment 28Tigger15-Nov-2003 04:42 GMT
Comment 29Ronald15-Nov-2003 05:22 GMT
Comment 30SenexRegistered user15-Nov-2003 05:55 GMT
Comment 31Leif15-Nov-2003 07:54 GMT
Comment 32samface15-Nov-2003 08:04 GMT
Comment 33samface15-Nov-2003 08:07 GMT
Comment 34samface15-Nov-2003 08:44 GMT
Comment 35Lando15-Nov-2003 08:46 GMT
Comment 36Anonymous15-Nov-2003 09:39 GMT
Comment 37IanSRegistered user15-Nov-2003 10:11 GMT
Comment 38SenexRegistered user15-Nov-2003 10:44 GMT
Comment 39Alkis TsapanidisRegistered user15-Nov-2003 10:47 GMT
Comment 40SenexRegistered user15-Nov-2003 11:06 GMT
Comment 41smithy15-Nov-2003 11:09 GMT
Comment 42IanSRegistered user15-Nov-2003 11:18 GMT
Comment 43JoannaK15-Nov-2003 12:16 GMT
Comment 44IanSRegistered user15-Nov-2003 12:19 GMT
Comment 45Anonymous15-Nov-2003 12:40 GMT
Comment 46Stefan Burström15-Nov-2003 13:29 GMT
Comment 47Stefan Burström15-Nov-2003 13:32 GMT
Comment 48Ronald15-Nov-2003 14:25 GMT
Comment 49BrianK15-Nov-2003 14:26 GMT
Comment 50Don CoxRegistered user15-Nov-2003 14:40 GMT
Comment 51Don CoxRegistered user15-Nov-2003 14:49 GMT
Comment 52samface15-Nov-2003 14:52 GMT
Comment 53samface15-Nov-2003 14:59 GMT
Comment 54Darrin15-Nov-2003 15:11 GMT
Comment 55Kronos15-Nov-2003 15:17 GMT
Comment 56-15-Nov-2003 16:06 GMT
Comment 57Darrin15-Nov-2003 16:27 GMT
Comment 58Darrin15-Nov-2003 16:37 GMT
Comment 59MIKE15-Nov-2003 16:45 GMT
Comment 60MIKE15-Nov-2003 16:58 GMT
Comment 61Darrin15-Nov-2003 17:06 GMT
Comment 62-15-Nov-2003 18:01 GMT
Comment 63Darrin15-Nov-2003 18:30 GMT
Comment 64Rich Woods15-Nov-2003 19:00 GMT
Comment 65Rich Woods15-Nov-2003 19:48 GMT
Comment 66BouncingAyatollah15-Nov-2003 22:38 GMT
Comment 67brotheris16-Nov-2003 04:23 GMT
Comment 68Rich Woods16-Nov-2003 06:13 GMT
Comment 69BouncingAyatollah16-Nov-2003 07:02 GMT
Comment 70Jupp316-Nov-2003 07:42 GMT
Comment 71Fabio Alemagna16-Nov-2003 08:39 GMT
Comment 72Fabio Alemagna16-Nov-2003 08:42 GMT
Comment 73Amon_ReRegistered user16-Nov-2003 10:29 GMT
Comment 74cheesegrate16-Nov-2003 11:27 GMT
Comment 75samface16-Nov-2003 17:27 GMT
Comment 76takemehomegrandmaRegistered user16-Nov-2003 21:35 GMT
Comment 77Rich Woods16-Nov-2003 21:43 GMT
Comment 78Rich Woods16-Nov-2003 21:49 GMT
Comment 79Rich Woods16-Nov-2003 22:21 GMT
Comment 80samface17-Nov-2003 04:46 GMT
Comment 81samface17-Nov-2003 04:47 GMT
Comment 82samface17-Nov-2003 04:48 GMT
Comment 83samface17-Nov-2003 04:54 GMT
Comment 84Rich Woods17-Nov-2003 09:06 GMT
Comment 85Rich Woods17-Nov-2003 09:08 GMT
Comment 86Rich Woods17-Nov-2003 09:13 GMT
Comment 87Rich Woods17-Nov-2003 09:30 GMT
Comment 88takemehomegrandmaRegistered user17-Nov-2003 11:16 GMT
Comment 89samface17-Nov-2003 11:28 GMT
Comment 90samface17-Nov-2003 12:53 GMT
Comment 91samface17-Nov-2003 12:55 GMT
Comment 92samface17-Nov-2003 13:32 GMT
Comment 93brotheris17-Nov-2003 16:40 GMT
Comment 94samface17-Nov-2003 17:10 GMT
Comment 95brotheris18-Nov-2003 05:15 GMT
Comment 96samface18-Nov-2003 08:03 GMT
Comment 97brotheris18-Nov-2003 09:02 GMT
Comment 98samface18-Nov-2003 11:10 GMT
Comment 99brotheris18-Nov-2003 14:08 GMT
Back to Top