| [News] Motion for Summary Judgement Against Amiga to be Heard on Nov 21, 2003. | ANN.lu |
| Posted on 16-Nov-2003 08:23 GMT by Rich Woods | 263 comments
View flat
View list | |
Motion for Summary Judgement Against Amiga to be Heard on Nov 21, 2003 in Washington Federal District Court.
Motion for Summary Judgement Against Amiga to be Heard on Nov 21, 2003 in Washington Federal District Court.
It also looks like Amiga is again without counsel.
"This matter comes before the Court on "Plantiffs' Motion for Judgement and dismissal of Counter Claims for Lack of Representation." Although corporations must be represented by counsel, defendant's failure to retain new counsel has not yet been given rise to a sanctionable failure to prosecute. Plantiff's motion for judgement and dismissal of the counterclaims is DENIED. Defendant must, however, obtain counsel to defend this litigation if it hopes to avoid an adverse ruling on plaantiff's pending motion for summary judgement.
DATED this 7th day of November,2003.
/s/
robert S. Lasnik
United States District Judge
Get it here .
|
|
| List of all comments to this article |
| Motion for Summary Judgement Against Amiga to be Heard on Nov 21, 2003. : Comment 131 of 263 | ANN.lu |
| Posted by samface on 17-Nov-2003 16:39 GMT | In reply to Comment 128 (Matt Parsons):
It's perfectly normal practice, especially when it comes to the law, to verify the authenticity of everything used as evidence. Rich Woods has never given us anything else besides his word that his documents are for real. Add to that, he never made it a secret that some parts are not available to everyone and kept password protected on his website.
You're of course fully entitled to question my sources just as I'm entitled to question his. Sign up for a PACER account (free and available for all) at https://pacer.psc.uscourts.gov/regform.html, then login with your username and password in the Western District of Washington's CM/ECF at https://ecf.wawd.uscourts.gov/. The case number is 2:03-cv-00003-RSL. There you will find everything I have on my website and there you have your verification wether they are modified or not.
Now tell me if you notice any differences in Rich Wood's and my way of handling people's request for verification of the documents authenticity. |
|
| List of all comments to this article (continued) |
|
- User Menu
-
- About ANN archives
- The ANN archives is powered by #AmigaZeux. It was updated daily (news last: 22-Oct-2004; comments last: 18-May-2005).
ANN.lu was created, previously owned and maintained by Christian Kemp, www.ckemp.com.
- Contribute
- Not possible at this time!
- Search ANN archives
- Advanced search
- Hosting
- ANN.lu was hosted by Dreamhost. Sign up through this link, mention "ckemp" as referrer and he will get a 10% commission on any account you purchase.
Please show your appreciation for any past, present and future work on ANN.lu by making a contribution via PayPal.
|
