[News] Motion for Summary Judgement Against Amiga to be Heard on Nov 21, 2003. | ANN.lu |
Posted on 16-Nov-2003 08:23 GMT by Rich Woods | 263 comments View flat View list |
Motion for Summary Judgement Against Amiga to be Heard on Nov 21, 2003 in Washington Federal District Court.
Motion for Summary Judgement Against Amiga to be Heard on Nov 21, 2003 in Washington Federal District Court.
It also looks like Amiga is again without counsel.
"This matter comes before the Court on "Plantiffs' Motion for Judgement and dismissal of Counter Claims for Lack of Representation." Although corporations must be represented by counsel, defendant's failure to retain new counsel has not yet been given rise to a sanctionable failure to prosecute. Plantiff's motion for judgement and dismissal of the counterclaims is DENIED. Defendant must, however, obtain counsel to defend this litigation if it hopes to avoid an adverse ruling on plaantiff's pending motion for summary judgement.
DATED this 7th day of November,2003.
/s/
robert S. Lasnik
United States District Judge
Get it here .
|
|
List of all comments to this article |
Motion for Summary Judgement Against Amiga to be Heard on Nov 21, 2003. : Comment 152 of 263 | ANN.lu |
Posted by Rich Woods on 18-Nov-2003 06:15 GMT | In reply to Comment 139 (samface): Posted by samface (131.116.254.199) on 17-Nov-2003 19:17:19
In Reply to Comment 135:
>Rich is providing a service bringing to light news which we would otherwise
>not have known about.
It's not so much about what he is doing, it's more about how he is doing it. That's why I chose to not depend on his "services".
-------------------
OK samface - you convientantly forgot to mention you DID have access to the Thendic-Amiga password protected session for many months - you got so out of control and rodiculous I cut off your access.
You whined and cried and then started saying I "left out" pages etc on documents. And you questioned the authenticity of these documents.
There was NO WAY for you to verify anything except for you to get the docs yourself - which I told you to do - it took you 6 months or so but I congratulate you on doing so.
Notwithstanding the fact you have no idea of what the court docs mean.
You still have problems with "left out" and "altered". I guess it depends on how you define "left out" and "altered".
Apparently most here understand the difference. I certainly fdon't expect you too with your hair splitting and mind games.
but then at least we know where you are coming from. |
|
List of all comments to this article (continued) |
|
- User Menu
-
- About ANN archives
- The ANN archives is powered by #AmigaZeux. It was updated daily (news last: 22-Oct-2004; comments last: 18-May-2005).
ANN.lu was created, previously owned and maintained by Christian Kemp, www.ckemp.com.
- Contribute
- Not possible at this time!
- Search ANN archives
- Advanced search
- Hosting
- ANN.lu was hosted by Dreamhost. Sign up through this link, mention "ckemp" as referrer and he will get a 10% commission on any account you purchase.
Please show your appreciation for any past, present and future work on ANN.lu by making a contribution via PayPal.
|