[News] Motion for Summary Judgement Against Amiga to be Heard on Nov 21, 2003. | ANN.lu |
Posted on 16-Nov-2003 08:23 GMT by Rich Woods | 263 comments View flat View list |
Motion for Summary Judgement Against Amiga to be Heard on Nov 21, 2003 in Washington Federal District Court.
Motion for Summary Judgement Against Amiga to be Heard on Nov 21, 2003 in Washington Federal District Court.
It also looks like Amiga is again without counsel.
"This matter comes before the Court on "Plantiffs' Motion for Judgement and dismissal of Counter Claims for Lack of Representation." Although corporations must be represented by counsel, defendant's failure to retain new counsel has not yet been given rise to a sanctionable failure to prosecute. Plantiff's motion for judgement and dismissal of the counterclaims is DENIED. Defendant must, however, obtain counsel to defend this litigation if it hopes to avoid an adverse ruling on plaantiff's pending motion for summary judgement.
DATED this 7th day of November,2003.
/s/
robert S. Lasnik
United States District Judge
Get it here .
|
|
List of all comments to this article |
Motion for Summary Judgement Against Amiga to be Heard on Nov 21, 2003. : Comment 155 of 263 | ANN.lu |
Posted by greenboy on 18-Nov-2003 07:22 GMT | In reply to Comment 131 (samface): >Now tell me if you notice any differences in Rich Wood's and my way of handling people's request for verification of the documents authenticity.
Yeah. You spent many months in denial. Meanwhile Rich got the news out and people were free to verify it for themselves or use their common sense. And those who thought these documents were real took the heat from people like you, who just wouldn't believe that court documents are court documents ; }
When people urged you time and again to FIND OUT FOR YOURSELF, first-hand - since you seemed to believe everything BUT what was most likely, you vacillated, prevaricated, ran crazy scenarios, and continued to speculate on authenticity, and on the meaning of the content (which kind of shows a funny irony).
Meanwhile, because Rich Woods made it easier for many, the documents were read by just about anybody who had any interest the matter.
But WOW - it finally appears like some simple advice to you was heeded. you actually LOOKED for yourself after all your bluster about PROOF and PROVING. But it looks like you are many months late ; } |
|
List of all comments to this article (continued) |
|
- User Menu
-
- About ANN archives
- The ANN archives is powered by #AmigaZeux. It was updated daily (news last: 22-Oct-2004; comments last: 18-May-2005).
ANN.lu was created, previously owned and maintained by Christian Kemp, www.ckemp.com.
- Contribute
- Not possible at this time!
- Search ANN archives
- Advanced search
- Hosting
- ANN.lu was hosted by Dreamhost. Sign up through this link, mention "ckemp" as referrer and he will get a 10% commission on any account you purchase.
Please show your appreciation for any past, present and future work on ANN.lu by making a contribution via PayPal.
|