| [News] Motion for Summary Judgement Against Amiga to be Heard on Nov 21, 2003. | ANN.lu |
| Posted on 16-Nov-2003 08:23 GMT by Rich Woods | 263 comments
View flat
View list | |
Motion for Summary Judgement Against Amiga to be Heard on Nov 21, 2003 in Washington Federal District Court.
Motion for Summary Judgement Against Amiga to be Heard on Nov 21, 2003 in Washington Federal District Court.
It also looks like Amiga is again without counsel.
"This matter comes before the Court on "Plantiffs' Motion for Judgement and dismissal of Counter Claims for Lack of Representation." Although corporations must be represented by counsel, defendant's failure to retain new counsel has not yet been given rise to a sanctionable failure to prosecute. Plantiff's motion for judgement and dismissal of the counterclaims is DENIED. Defendant must, however, obtain counsel to defend this litigation if it hopes to avoid an adverse ruling on plaantiff's pending motion for summary judgement.
DATED this 7th day of November,2003.
/s/
robert S. Lasnik
United States District Judge
Get it here .
|
|
| List of all comments to this article |
| Motion for Summary Judgement Against Amiga to be Heard on Nov 21, 2003. : Comment 167 of 263 | ANN.lu |
| Posted by Rich Woods on 18-Nov-2003 17:29 GMT | In reply to Comment 165 (samface):
Posted by samface (131.116.254.198) on 18-Nov-2003 16:38:49
In Reply to Comment 164:
I don't know what they teach the kids in shools of other nationalities, but I know that atleast they teach swedish kids at the age of somewhere between 13-15 the practise of always providing a reference to your source when publishing. To
-----------
Hurrah - so you say my documents are not verifiable but since I won't give you continued access you cannot verify the documents?
You had access for MANY months, you had the court clerk stamp on the documents, you had the court info on the documents, you had the lawyers contact info on the documents, you had the court clerk's phone number on the documents.
and now you whine that I didn't give you continued access to verify documents that you said I left out info.
More samface logic - point is you were too lazy to do anything yourself except after 6 months or so. Finally you were able to verify the documents (as others did) and now have admitted (in a round about way) my documents were correct and true - I can at least thank you for that.
The password protected directory contained other documents not related to the Thenid case - only TRUSTED individuals were given access - THAT is the reason I cut off your access. Your logic and unrational thinking did not want me to let you have access to Amiga's D&B report, Gary peake's bankruptcy filings and other sensitive documents.
Thendic docs were placed in the amigabk directory which is/was open to all.
me, it's perfectly natural to turn to the publisher when wanting to verify the source of something published. That's what I did but all I got was a "get it
Samface - if my documents were verifiable to your liking then you go to the SOURCE the courts - which you finally did after 6+ months.
yourself" without any help what so ever of how and where to look. It was pure luck that I found the PACER system which gave me this ability, but it took me more than a month, almost two before I finally got what I wanted (I didn't even know the case number and searching the online archives costs 7 cents per try)
Congratulations. We'll put a gold star next to your name.
.
You know, I find it difficult to understand that some people actually have the insolence to complain at me for not doing this sooner instead of turning to Rich Woods for a simple reference to his sources. It's not very polite, nor rational behaviour, I'm afraid.
You had a reference to my sources - the actual COURT DOCS itself which you had for 6+ months - verifiable contact info was on EVERY page of the court documents.
This hair-splitting and obvious falsified thinking shows that my decision to NOT allow you access to sensitive NON-Thendic documentation was correct.
You have "VERIFIED" my actions as correct - and you thankfully continue to do so in each and every post. |
|
| List of all comments to this article (continued) |
|
- User Menu
-
- About ANN archives
- The ANN archives is powered by #AmigaZeux. It was updated daily (news last: 22-Oct-2004; comments last: 18-May-2005).
ANN.lu was created, previously owned and maintained by Christian Kemp, www.ckemp.com.
- Contribute
- Not possible at this time!
- Search ANN archives
- Advanced search
- Hosting
- ANN.lu was hosted by Dreamhost. Sign up through this link, mention "ckemp" as referrer and he will get a 10% commission on any account you purchase.
Please show your appreciation for any past, present and future work on ANN.lu by making a contribution via PayPal.
|
