| [News] Motion for Summary Judgement Against Amiga to be Heard on Nov 21, 2003. | ANN.lu |
| Posted on 16-Nov-2003 08:23 GMT by Rich Woods | 263 comments
View flat
View list | |
Motion for Summary Judgement Against Amiga to be Heard on Nov 21, 2003 in Washington Federal District Court.
Motion for Summary Judgement Against Amiga to be Heard on Nov 21, 2003 in Washington Federal District Court.
It also looks like Amiga is again without counsel.
"This matter comes before the Court on "Plantiffs' Motion for Judgement and dismissal of Counter Claims for Lack of Representation." Although corporations must be represented by counsel, defendant's failure to retain new counsel has not yet been given rise to a sanctionable failure to prosecute. Plantiff's motion for judgement and dismissal of the counterclaims is DENIED. Defendant must, however, obtain counsel to defend this litigation if it hopes to avoid an adverse ruling on plaantiff's pending motion for summary judgement.
DATED this 7th day of November,2003.
/s/
robert S. Lasnik
United States District Judge
Get it here .
|
|
| List of all comments to this article |
| Motion for Summary Judgement Against Amiga to be Heard on Nov 21, 2003. : Comment 181 of 263 | ANN.lu |
| Posted by acg on 19-Nov-2003 04:53 GMT | I'm not a lawyer, but somethings sounds fishy.....I mean if you sue someone in a federal court who has no money, and they cannot get "official" counsel....then
they lose? This sounds like a recipe for bigger companies who have larger
resources picking on a smaller company and sue them till they go bankrupt.
It could be corporation takeoever without buying it out...you just sue it out
of existence....a really smart guy could try and make contracts a with small
struggling company, and go for the throat if that small company did something
that could be construed as a breach of contract buy suing them until they went
bankrupt. Then the smart guy could get assets in return for payment.
In a criminal court of law, one can get a "public" defender for free.. Are there any "public" defenders in a federal court of law?
The whole thing is a terrible affair. |
|
| List of all comments to this article (continued) |
|
- User Menu
-
- About ANN archives
- The ANN archives is powered by #AmigaZeux. It was updated daily (news last: 22-Oct-2004; comments last: 18-May-2005).
ANN.lu was created, previously owned and maintained by Christian Kemp, www.ckemp.com.
- Contribute
- Not possible at this time!
- Search ANN archives
- Advanced search
- Hosting
- ANN.lu was hosted by Dreamhost. Sign up through this link, mention "ckemp" as referrer and he will get a 10% commission on any account you purchase.
Please show your appreciation for any past, present and future work on ANN.lu by making a contribution via PayPal.
|
