| [News] Motion for Summary Judgement Against Amiga to be Heard on Nov 21, 2003. | ANN.lu |
| Posted on 16-Nov-2003 08:23 GMT by Rich Woods | 263 comments
View flat
View list | |
Motion for Summary Judgement Against Amiga to be Heard on Nov 21, 2003 in Washington Federal District Court.
Motion for Summary Judgement Against Amiga to be Heard on Nov 21, 2003 in Washington Federal District Court.
It also looks like Amiga is again without counsel.
"This matter comes before the Court on "Plantiffs' Motion for Judgement and dismissal of Counter Claims for Lack of Representation." Although corporations must be represented by counsel, defendant's failure to retain new counsel has not yet been given rise to a sanctionable failure to prosecute. Plantiff's motion for judgement and dismissal of the counterclaims is DENIED. Defendant must, however, obtain counsel to defend this litigation if it hopes to avoid an adverse ruling on plaantiff's pending motion for summary judgement.
DATED this 7th day of November,2003.
/s/
robert S. Lasnik
United States District Judge
Get it here .
|
|
| List of all comments to this article |
| Motion for Summary Judgement Against Amiga to be Heard on Nov 21, 2003. : Comment 191 of 263 | ANN.lu |
| Posted by gary_c on 19-Nov-2003 10:50 GMT | In reply to Comment 188 (Anonymous):
> > I guess you've never used or seen a Pegasos board in person. It's actually a
> > very nicely designed and built piece of hardware
> I have a Gameboy Advance that works a lot better than all Pegasos I've been exposed to; I've yet to see it crash and it's very responsive. The GBA is a toy, and yet it works better than a Peg. Hmmm.
The Gameboy Advance is a mature product with lots of development hours and yen behind it, and is a rather specialized, closed system. Yes, I'd expect a Gameboy this far along in the product cycle to work pretty flawlessly. (The fact that it's a "toy" is beside the point, really. The label is arbitrary, but calling a computer motherboard a "toy" suggests that it's somehow substandard -- you'll have to be more specific about that if you want the idea to be taken seriously.) The Pegasos is a new product; more to the point MorphOS is still early in its development. What are you trying to say, that a relatively complex product at an early stage in its life cycle should be as solid as a simpler mature product? Hmm.
-- gary_c |
|
| List of all comments to this article (continued) |
|
- User Menu
-
- About ANN archives
- The ANN archives is powered by #AmigaZeux. It was updated daily (news last: 22-Oct-2004; comments last: 18-May-2005).
ANN.lu was created, previously owned and maintained by Christian Kemp, www.ckemp.com.
- Contribute
- Not possible at this time!
- Search ANN archives
- Advanced search
- Hosting
- ANN.lu was hosted by Dreamhost. Sign up through this link, mention "ckemp" as referrer and he will get a 10% commission on any account you purchase.
Please show your appreciation for any past, present and future work on ANN.lu by making a contribution via PayPal.
|
