| [News] Motion for Summary Judgement Against Amiga to be Heard on Nov 21, 2003. | ANN.lu |
| Posted on 16-Nov-2003 08:23 GMT by Rich Woods | 263 comments
View flat
View list | |
Motion for Summary Judgement Against Amiga to be Heard on Nov 21, 2003 in Washington Federal District Court.
Motion for Summary Judgement Against Amiga to be Heard on Nov 21, 2003 in Washington Federal District Court.
It also looks like Amiga is again without counsel.
"This matter comes before the Court on "Plantiffs' Motion for Judgement and dismissal of Counter Claims for Lack of Representation." Although corporations must be represented by counsel, defendant's failure to retain new counsel has not yet been given rise to a sanctionable failure to prosecute. Plantiff's motion for judgement and dismissal of the counterclaims is DENIED. Defendant must, however, obtain counsel to defend this litigation if it hopes to avoid an adverse ruling on plaantiff's pending motion for summary judgement.
DATED this 7th day of November,2003.
/s/
robert S. Lasnik
United States District Judge
Get it here .
|
|
| List of all comments to this article |
| Motion for Summary Judgement Against Amiga to be Heard on Nov 21, 2003. : Comment 196 of 263 | ANN.lu |
| Posted by samface on 19-Nov-2003 13:07 GMT | In reply to Comment 193 (Anonymous):
>Secondly, this isn't "Amiga seems to be focus....". We all know that Amiga Inc
>has nothing to do with OS4.
You know, I'm getting rather fed up with this bullsh*t. Amiga Inc. is just as involved with AmigaOS4 as Genesi is with bPlan's Pegasos and MorphOS. I mean, do you really think Bill Buck or Raquel Velasco ever lifted a finger to create the Pegasos design or programmed a single line of code on MorphOS? The only difference between Amiga Inc. and the former Thendic-France (Genesi) is that Thendic-France and bPlan merged into one company while Amiga Inc. and Hyperion chose to remain as seperate companies. There are just about as much advantages as disadvantages with both strategies but little differences when it comes to what it means for the end user.
>We all also know that they are insolvent, millions of dollars in debt and have
>no employees.
Check your facts, I have court documents prooving they do have employees, atleast according to Bill McEwen's testimony under oath.
>We also know that no new DE products have been announced by Amiga Inc for a
>very long time.
Just like we have yet to see the Pegasos2. You know, I believe Amiga Inc. has actually sold more products than Genesi if you count all AmigaDE products, the AmigaDE SDK, AmigaOS3.9, etc.
>Maybe you were referring to OS5... well do you honestly believe Amiga Inc has
>done any coding on this? (Answer yes or no).
Yes. Amiga2D is already available for the AmigaDE and will be a part of the AmigaOS5. I'm sure there are more examples, I'm just not that much into AmigaDE development.
>Remember that Amiga Inc have no employees, no money, no clue, and no DE
>development for a long time. If there is no development of DE, why do you
>think there is any of OS5?
How come you think you know this as facts when you are only assuming this based on the little information you have? |
|
| List of all comments to this article (continued) |
|
- User Menu
-
- About ANN archives
- The ANN archives is powered by #AmigaZeux. It was updated daily (news last: 22-Oct-2004; comments last: 18-May-2005).
ANN.lu was created, previously owned and maintained by Christian Kemp, www.ckemp.com.
- Contribute
- Not possible at this time!
- Search ANN archives
- Advanced search
- Hosting
- ANN.lu was hosted by Dreamhost. Sign up through this link, mention "ckemp" as referrer and he will get a 10% commission on any account you purchase.
Please show your appreciation for any past, present and future work on ANN.lu by making a contribution via PayPal.
|
