[News] Motion for Summary Judgement Against Amiga to be Heard on Nov 21, 2003. | ANN.lu |
Posted on 16-Nov-2003 08:23 GMT by Rich Woods | 263 comments View flat View list |
Motion for Summary Judgement Against Amiga to be Heard on Nov 21, 2003 in Washington Federal District Court.
Motion for Summary Judgement Against Amiga to be Heard on Nov 21, 2003 in Washington Federal District Court.
It also looks like Amiga is again without counsel.
"This matter comes before the Court on "Plantiffs' Motion for Judgement and dismissal of Counter Claims for Lack of Representation." Although corporations must be represented by counsel, defendant's failure to retain new counsel has not yet been given rise to a sanctionable failure to prosecute. Plantiff's motion for judgement and dismissal of the counterclaims is DENIED. Defendant must, however, obtain counsel to defend this litigation if it hopes to avoid an adverse ruling on plaantiff's pending motion for summary judgement.
DATED this 7th day of November,2003.
/s/
robert S. Lasnik
United States District Judge
Get it here .
|
|
List of all comments to this article |
Motion for Summary Judgement Against Amiga to be Heard on Nov 21, 2003. : Comment 258 of 263 | ANN.lu |
Posted by samface on 26-Nov-2003 00:47 GMT | In reply to Comment 256 (Tigger): BTW:
>1000's of us did with the SDK, as over 700 of us did with the Party Pak and of
>course with the most recent CAM which 1300 invested in
That would be a total of somewhere near $235k. Considering that this is less than 2 months of salaries for Amiga Inc., does it really make sense to endanger their relationship with their customers for such insignificant amount of money? Please, out of all motives possible for selling these offers, ripping their small but loyal customer base off is not one of them.
I've also invested, well aware of that they are a small, foreign startup company and all the risks that comes with it. However, when it comes to your math about their budget, let's just let time tell, shall we? I mean, arguing about it makes no sense when it just means that one of us has to say (if he has not done so already) something he will have to regret. |
|
List of all comments to this article (continued) |
|
- User Menu
-
- About ANN archives
- The ANN archives is powered by #AmigaZeux. It was updated daily (news last: 22-Oct-2004; comments last: 18-May-2005).
ANN.lu was created, previously owned and maintained by Christian Kemp, www.ckemp.com.
- Contribute
- Not possible at this time!
- Search ANN archives
- Advanced search
- Hosting
- ANN.lu was hosted by Dreamhost. Sign up through this link, mention "ckemp" as referrer and he will get a 10% commission on any account you purchase.
Please show your appreciation for any past, present and future work on ANN.lu by making a contribution via PayPal.
|