25-Apr-2024 15:28 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[News] Thendic-FranceANN.lu
Posted on 17-Nov-2003 19:18 GMT by bbrv161 comments
View flat
View list
At today's hearing of the Tribunal of Commerce in Paris a judgment was rendered declaring Pretory, S.A. in bankruptcy and appointing a receiver. The process finally will now begin to transfer Thendic-France's assets to Genesi SARL. Our situation with Pretory S.A. has been a long and difficult one. In all matters we have cooperated with the French Government and agreed to close the Company in a coordinated and proper manner. Time will demonstrate that we have behaved properly and legally in all respects as shareholders and managers. In no way will these matters effect Genesi. Finally, we are personally free to devote the time and resources we want to the Genesi. Sincerely, Raquel and Bill
List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1SenexRegistered user17-Nov-2003 18:44 GMT
Comment 2Anonymous17-Nov-2003 18:51 GMT
Comment 3Ron van HerkRegistered user17-Nov-2003 18:52 GMT
Comment 4Gunne Steen17-Nov-2003 18:57 GMT
Comment 5Anonymous17-Nov-2003 18:59 GMT
Comment 6bbrvRegistered user17-Nov-2003 19:00 GMT
Comment 7Anonymous17-Nov-2003 19:07 GMT
Comment 8DaveP17-Nov-2003 19:08 GMT
Comment 9bbrvRegistered user17-Nov-2003 19:16 GMT
Comment 10samface17-Nov-2003 19:22 GMT
Comment 11Anonymous17-Nov-2003 19:23 GMT
Comment 12Nate DownesRegistered user17-Nov-2003 19:25 GMT
Comment 13Anonymous17-Nov-2003 19:26 GMT
Comment 14Crumb // AATRegistered user17-Nov-2003 19:32 GMT
Comment 15samface17-Nov-2003 19:36 GMT
Comment 16bbrvRegistered user17-Nov-2003 19:47 GMT
Comment 17Anonymous17-Nov-2003 19:47 GMT
Comment 18Darth_X17-Nov-2003 19:53 GMT
Comment 19Anonymous17-Nov-2003 20:17 GMT
Comment 20Christophe DecaniniRegistered user17-Nov-2003 20:21 GMT
Comment 21bbrvRegistered user17-Nov-2003 20:24 GMT
Comment 22Nate DownesRegistered user17-Nov-2003 20:34 GMT
Comment 23Nate DownesRegistered user17-Nov-2003 20:39 GMT
Comment 24bbrvRegistered user17-Nov-2003 20:40 GMT
Comment 25Tipu17-Nov-2003 20:40 GMT
Comment 26stumpy17-Nov-2003 20:52 GMT
Comment 27Anonymous17-Nov-2003 21:32 GMT
Comment 28Nate DownesRegistered user17-Nov-2003 21:41 GMT
Comment 29Christoph Gutjahr17-Nov-2003 22:01 GMT
Comment 30bbrvRegistered user17-Nov-2003 22:38 GMT
Comment 31NekoRegistered user17-Nov-2003 22:40 GMT
Comment 32Anonymous17-Nov-2003 22:41 GMT
Comment 33Mithalas17-Nov-2003 22:55 GMT
Comment 34bbrvRegistered user17-Nov-2003 22:59 GMT
Comment 35Van M.17-Nov-2003 23:58 GMT
Comment 36Oppressor18-Nov-2003 00:09 GMT
Comment 37T_Bone18-Nov-2003 00:47 GMT
Comment 38Anonymous18-Nov-2003 01:00 GMT
Comment 39greenboyRegistered user18-Nov-2003 01:01 GMT
Comment 40T_Bone18-Nov-2003 02:34 GMT
Comment 41T_Bone18-Nov-2003 03:06 GMT
Comment 42Nate DownesRegistered user18-Nov-2003 03:26 GMT
Comment 43John18-Nov-2003 03:32 GMT
Comment 44TarghanRegistered user18-Nov-2003 04:01 GMT
Comment 45DaveP18-Nov-2003 06:23 GMT
Comment 46Anonymous18-Nov-2003 06:56 GMT
Comment 47gary_c18-Nov-2003 06:58 GMT
Comment 48greenboyRegistered user18-Nov-2003 07:03 GMT
Comment 49Anonymous18-Nov-2003 07:06 GMT
Comment 50Anonymous18-Nov-2003 07:12 GMT
Comment 51Anonymous18-Nov-2003 07:13 GMT
Comment 52DaveP18-Nov-2003 07:21 GMT
Comment 53SJ18-Nov-2003 07:24 GMT
Comment 54DaveP18-Nov-2003 07:26 GMT
Comment 55Ben Yoris18-Nov-2003 07:52 GMT
Comment 56SenexRegistered user18-Nov-2003 08:58 GMT
Comment 57samface18-Nov-2003 09:06 GMT
Comment 58Oppressor18-Nov-2003 09:27 GMT
Comment 59Anonymous18-Nov-2003 09:59 GMT
Comment 60Anonymous18-Nov-2003 10:01 GMT
Comment 61Alkis TsapanidisRegistered user18-Nov-2003 10:28 GMT
Comment 62Alkis TsapanidisRegistered user18-Nov-2003 10:32 GMT
Comment 63Bill Hoggett18-Nov-2003 10:35 GMT
Comment 64NekoRegistered user18-Nov-2003 10:36 GMT
Comment 65John18-Nov-2003 10:47 GMT
Comment 66Amon_ReRegistered user18-Nov-2003 10:48 GMT
Comment 67Amon_ReRegistered user18-Nov-2003 10:51 GMT
Comment 68Amon_ReRegistered user18-Nov-2003 10:54 GMT
Comment 69DaveP18-Nov-2003 10:55 GMT
Comment 70JoannaK18-Nov-2003 10:55 GMT
Comment 71Amon_ReRegistered user18-Nov-2003 10:55 GMT
Comment 72Amon_ReRegistered user18-Nov-2003 10:58 GMT
Comment 73Abuse18-Nov-2003 10:59 GMT
Comment 74DaveP18-Nov-2003 11:06 GMT
Comment 75AdmV18-Nov-2003 11:17 GMT
Comment 76Amon_ReRegistered user18-Nov-2003 11:19 GMT
Comment 77Bill Hoggett18-Nov-2003 11:43 GMT
Comment 78Alfie Moon18-Nov-2003 12:03 GMT
Comment 79Oppressor18-Nov-2003 12:07 GMT
Comment 80Christian KempRegistered user18-Nov-2003 12:19 GMT
Comment 81stumpy18-Nov-2003 12:27 GMT
Comment 82SenexRegistered user18-Nov-2003 12:58 GMT
Comment 83bbrvRegistered user18-Nov-2003 12:59 GMT
Comment 84Oppressor18-Nov-2003 13:52 GMT
Comment 85EmpathyLesson18-Nov-2003 13:57 GMT
Comment 86Matt Parsons18-Nov-2003 14:13 GMT
Comment 87samface18-Nov-2003 14:35 GMT
Comment 88Tigger18-Nov-2003 15:39 GMT
Comment 89Darrin18-Nov-2003 17:13 GMT
Comment 90T_Bone18-Nov-2003 18:28 GMT
Comment 91Amon_ReRegistered user18-Nov-2003 20:40 GMT
Comment 92Matt Parsons18-Nov-2003 20:55 GMT
Comment 93Anonymous18-Nov-2003 21:26 GMT
Comment 94T_Bone18-Nov-2003 22:12 GMT
Comment 95greenboyRegistered user18-Nov-2003 22:53 GMT
Comment 96greenboyRegistered user18-Nov-2003 23:33 GMT
Comment 97gary_c18-Nov-2003 23:54 GMT
Comment 98cheesegrate19-Nov-2003 02:11 GMT
Comment 99Anonymous19-Nov-2003 02:59 GMT
Comment 100Ronald19-Nov-2003 04:39 GMT
Comment 101DaveP19-Nov-2003 08:43 GMT
Comment 102DaveP19-Nov-2003 09:33 GMT
Comment 103Amon_ReRegistered user19-Nov-2003 10:34 GMT
Comment 104Anonymous19-Nov-2003 10:42 GMT
Comment 105JoannaK19-Nov-2003 11:15 GMT
Comment 106bbrvRegistered user19-Nov-2003 11:20 GMT
Comment 107DaveP19-Nov-2003 11:21 GMT
Comment 108redrumloa19-Nov-2003 11:25 GMT
Comment 109Oppressor19-Nov-2003 11:31 GMT
Comment 110Paul H19-Nov-2003 11:42 GMT
Comment 111Anonymous19-Nov-2003 11:44 GMT
Comment 112bbrvRegistered user19-Nov-2003 11:55 GMT
Comment 113Oppressor19-Nov-2003 12:06 GMT
Comment 114Christophe DecaniniRegistered user19-Nov-2003 12:22 GMT
Comment 115bbrvRegistered user19-Nov-2003 12:22 GMT
Comment 116bbrvRegistered user19-Nov-2003 12:35 GMT
Thendic-France : Comment 117 of 161ANN.lu
Posted by Damien Naviliat on 19-Nov-2003 12:56 GMT
In reply to Comment 106 (bbrv):
Hello guys

@all
BBRV recieved this reply directly from my personnal email, for spam reasons, I don't want my email to be spread around the net.

Hell Bill,

>Hi Anonymous 195.212.190.98, you are no better than the myterious sources >being quoted for those articles.

How well, having a pseudo isn't usefull too to know who am I, so here is my real name.
The sources of those articles aren't mysterious. Humanité is a newspaper that exists since so many years, liberation too. Those two newspapers are near 75years old. A you say in the end of your reply, those accusations are true and not mysterious (it's you that told this).


>1. Garry Hare did carry a business card that indicated he was the CEO and >Chairman of Amiga Inc. He gave the card to many people. We even spoke to him a >couple of times. He investigated the situation and decided he did not want to >be involved. Did you miss the acknowledgment that finally came from Fleecy?

Well again it's your declaration.

Don't try to change the reality about what Fleecy said, he never stated that this one was the CEO, just told about a guy from their investors that came to evaluate the situation. Have you a link to such a declaration Fleecy?

You can pretend what you like about business cards and so on, I know who is Gary Hare and what it does. I won't talk about this publicly just because there are lawsuits on the run.

>2. Tao has ported Intent to PowerPC. If the decision this week is favorable on >the Summary Judgment against Amiga we will go to Tao and ask them if they are >interested. Frankly, the AmigaDE part seems to exist in name only. But, we >will know for certain soon.

Well, here I go.

When you talk about something that exist or don't exist, you have to know what you are talking about Bill. As A regular DE developer I know what is or isn't AmigaDE. And this is more than you seems to think about (or probably more than you "pretend" to think, because bringing down all that is Amiga Inc is good for you, since this is business). I take, and I'm shure every DE developer too, take this as a personnal attack. We, DE developers, have worked harder and harder to bring chances for this product to have a life. Talking about DE that don't exist is so a sign of deny for all work done by the developers community.

I don't mean here that you are talking specially for DE developers, but talking about a product that don't exist simply alienate all the work done by DE developers. But in real, they (DE developers) have achieved an enormous amount of work for the DE and when you pretend this product don't exists, you pretend every person of this developper community who work hundreds and hundreds of hours are doing nothing.

Since you are bringing a product on the market you know that developing new concepts (when not copying that already exists) is long and hard to do. Don't expect to have the DE finished before it is. I remind you (it seems you're interested by TAO)that intent is just a basic Os, and I wouldn't say it's an Os, it's a minimum Os, really efficiant even on poor hardware.

For comparisons, in times, when pegasos was in development and that no one can see the product, I never heard Amiga (or not me) telling that the pegasos is a product that don't exist ok? We all know you hate Amiga Inc team (I even have real proofs about this, real proofs on how you can be when you hate someone), I don't like you due to your way to do business. I or even Amiga haven't never, never criticized the quality/existance MOS nor Pegasos ok? THIS is the start of real business, it's amazing to act this way. Another point is that it's easy to criticize works done when you sell a product that has started to be developed many years before os4/DE/amigaone.



The DE itslef is more than was pretent on this post. Having such sentences are spreading false informations, false debates, and you don't want that is it, 'cause you're a good and professional business man is it?
If you really reply honnestly don't pretend wrong things, specially when you know their wrong! Act like this, and there will never be another guy like me to pretent you tell lies Bill!


>3. Nearly, all the things mentioned in terms of Pretory SA in the articles are >true, which is why we fired the French manager. Keep in mind that we were >shareholders and had little if anything to do with this day to day business. >The really sad part about all this is that there were MANY employees that were >exceptionally good and hard working people.

I think that when you don't talk about Amiga, you can be honnest. I trust you on this point, even if the French justice is completely corrupted (and I saw in the TV journal your "formidable" machines that will detect every man who smoked a joint in airport, I asked myself if there's a reason why you don't have problems personnaly with justice, maybe because our government "needs" those machines, so it needs you, but enough, I told I trust you on this point, but it's an idea I had before your reply...

>If you can find the courage to reveal your identity and email us personally we >will be happy to continue this discussion directly. In the meanwhile, your >post in light of everything else mentioned and discussed in this thread is >simply another attempt to throw gas on a fire that is not burning -- not here >and not in France. Now into the dryer! You are all washed up!

Easy for you. You like, and you're often there, concilient and friendly, when things are defavorable to Amiga Inc. In the other way, you are accusating every persons who dislikes your point of view of trolling, throwing gaz on fire of things like that. Did you realize this?

Last thing, on the last topic about thendic-amiga, I have posted 3 links that reveal the pletory story (the mamous mysterious sources you told about).
This post has been deleted (or I don't saw him anymore) "due to policy reasons".

The next day, there is a topic about the pletory situation... You are not the admin of this site but this seems strange top me.

Best Regards.
Damien.
Jump...
#118 Damien Naviliat #121 Christian Kemp #145 Nicolas Sallin
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 118Damien Naviliat19-Nov-2003 13:01 GMT
Comment 119Nowee19-Nov-2003 13:05 GMT
Comment 120Damien Naviliat19-Nov-2003 13:07 GMT
Comment 121Christian KempRegistered user19-Nov-2003 13:22 GMT
Comment 122Damien Naviliat19-Nov-2003 13:33 GMT
Comment 123Lennart Fridén19-Nov-2003 14:22 GMT
Comment 124bbrvRegistered user19-Nov-2003 14:58 GMT
Comment 125Matt Parsons19-Nov-2003 15:18 GMT
Comment 126DaveP19-Nov-2003 15:20 GMT
Comment 127Matt Parsons19-Nov-2003 15:24 GMT
Comment 128bbrvRegistered user19-Nov-2003 15:25 GMT
Comment 129Matt Parsons19-Nov-2003 15:35 GMT
Comment 130Damien Naviliat19-Nov-2003 15:43 GMT
Comment 131greenboyRegistered user19-Nov-2003 15:55 GMT
Comment 132bbrvRegistered user19-Nov-2003 15:55 GMT
Comment 133Christophe DecaniniRegistered user19-Nov-2003 16:09 GMT
Comment 134bbrvRegistered user19-Nov-2003 16:26 GMT
Comment 135DaveP19-Nov-2003 16:36 GMT
Comment 136Christophe DecaniniRegistered user19-Nov-2003 16:38 GMT
Comment 137Abuse19-Nov-2003 16:56 GMT
Comment 138Ann19-Nov-2003 21:17 GMT
Comment 139Ann19-Nov-2003 21:28 GMT
Comment 140Amon_ReRegistered user19-Nov-2003 21:33 GMT
Comment 141Ann19-Nov-2003 21:38 GMT
Comment 142Amon_ReRegistered user19-Nov-2003 22:10 GMT
Comment 143Amon_ReRegistered user19-Nov-2003 22:14 GMT
Comment 144greenboyRegistered user19-Nov-2003 22:39 GMT
Comment 145Nicolas Sallin20-Nov-2003 00:39 GMT
Comment 146Anonymous20-Nov-2003 03:59 GMT
Comment 147CleanRoomMyAzz20-Nov-2003 04:03 GMT
Comment 148Nicolas Sallin20-Nov-2003 05:46 GMT
Comment 149DaveP20-Nov-2003 05:56 GMT
Comment 150Anonymous20-Nov-2003 06:03 GMT
Comment 151gary_c20-Nov-2003 06:15 GMT
Comment 152gary_c20-Nov-2003 06:21 GMT
Comment 153Anonymous20-Nov-2003 06:31 GMT
Comment 154Nicolas Sallin20-Nov-2003 07:16 GMT
Comment 155Anonymous20-Nov-2003 07:27 GMT
Comment 156DaveP20-Nov-2003 07:34 GMT
Comment 157BuriedHeads20-Nov-2003 14:40 GMT
Comment 158Stephane Desrosiers20-Nov-2003 14:42 GMT
Comment 159PunditsRock20-Nov-2003 14:43 GMT
Comment 160damien naviliat20-Nov-2003 15:07 GMT
Comment 161Matt Parsons20-Nov-2003 15:10 GMT
Back to Top