19-Apr-2024 06:09 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[News] Thendic-FranceANN.lu
Posted on 17-Nov-2003 19:18 GMT by bbrv161 comments
View flat
View list
At today's hearing of the Tribunal of Commerce in Paris a judgment was rendered declaring Pretory, S.A. in bankruptcy and appointing a receiver. The process finally will now begin to transfer Thendic-France's assets to Genesi SARL. Our situation with Pretory S.A. has been a long and difficult one. In all matters we have cooperated with the French Government and agreed to close the Company in a coordinated and proper manner. Time will demonstrate that we have behaved properly and legally in all respects as shareholders and managers. In no way will these matters effect Genesi. Finally, we are personally free to devote the time and resources we want to the Genesi. Sincerely, Raquel and Bill
List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1SenexRegistered user17-Nov-2003 18:44 GMT
Comment 2Anonymous17-Nov-2003 18:51 GMT
Comment 3Ron van HerkRegistered user17-Nov-2003 18:52 GMT
Comment 4Gunne Steen17-Nov-2003 18:57 GMT
Comment 5Anonymous17-Nov-2003 18:59 GMT
Comment 6bbrvRegistered user17-Nov-2003 19:00 GMT
Comment 7Anonymous17-Nov-2003 19:07 GMT
Comment 8DaveP17-Nov-2003 19:08 GMT
Comment 9bbrvRegistered user17-Nov-2003 19:16 GMT
Comment 10samface17-Nov-2003 19:22 GMT
Comment 11Anonymous17-Nov-2003 19:23 GMT
Comment 12Nate DownesRegistered user17-Nov-2003 19:25 GMT
Comment 13Anonymous17-Nov-2003 19:26 GMT
Comment 14Crumb // AATRegistered user17-Nov-2003 19:32 GMT
Comment 15samface17-Nov-2003 19:36 GMT
Comment 16bbrvRegistered user17-Nov-2003 19:47 GMT
Comment 17Anonymous17-Nov-2003 19:47 GMT
Comment 18Darth_X17-Nov-2003 19:53 GMT
Comment 19Anonymous17-Nov-2003 20:17 GMT
Comment 20Christophe DecaniniRegistered user17-Nov-2003 20:21 GMT
Comment 21bbrvRegistered user17-Nov-2003 20:24 GMT
Comment 22Nate DownesRegistered user17-Nov-2003 20:34 GMT
Comment 23Nate DownesRegistered user17-Nov-2003 20:39 GMT
Comment 24bbrvRegistered user17-Nov-2003 20:40 GMT
Comment 25Tipu17-Nov-2003 20:40 GMT
Comment 26stumpy17-Nov-2003 20:52 GMT
Comment 27Anonymous17-Nov-2003 21:32 GMT
Comment 28Nate DownesRegistered user17-Nov-2003 21:41 GMT
Comment 29Christoph Gutjahr17-Nov-2003 22:01 GMT
Comment 30bbrvRegistered user17-Nov-2003 22:38 GMT
Comment 31NekoRegistered user17-Nov-2003 22:40 GMT
Comment 32Anonymous17-Nov-2003 22:41 GMT
Comment 33Mithalas17-Nov-2003 22:55 GMT
Comment 34bbrvRegistered user17-Nov-2003 22:59 GMT
Comment 35Van M.17-Nov-2003 23:58 GMT
Comment 36Oppressor18-Nov-2003 00:09 GMT
Comment 37T_Bone18-Nov-2003 00:47 GMT
Comment 38Anonymous18-Nov-2003 01:00 GMT
Comment 39greenboyRegistered user18-Nov-2003 01:01 GMT
Comment 40T_Bone18-Nov-2003 02:34 GMT
Comment 41T_Bone18-Nov-2003 03:06 GMT
Comment 42Nate DownesRegistered user18-Nov-2003 03:26 GMT
Comment 43John18-Nov-2003 03:32 GMT
Comment 44TarghanRegistered user18-Nov-2003 04:01 GMT
Comment 45DaveP18-Nov-2003 06:23 GMT
Comment 46Anonymous18-Nov-2003 06:56 GMT
Thendic-France : Comment 47 of 161ANN.lu
Posted by gary_c on 18-Nov-2003 06:58 GMT
In reply to Comment 45 (DaveP):
DaveP wrote:
> RVBB coming on here and informing everyone of what had gone on was a good move, it allowed them, if they wanted, to set the spin on the story from the very start.

It's an accepted practice in business and politics, etc., if there's potentially controversial news or something that's apt to be misunderstood or misportrayed, to deliver the news yourself rather than go into quiet mode and let everyone else interpret the news to themselves and each other. From a cynical view this is putting the first spin on the story; but it's also being upfront about things.

> The subjective part, played by the usual suspects, is what makes this guy suspect that it might not all be a bed of roses.

I don't know why the fact that Genesi staff or Pegasos users or whoever chimed in would make the initial post any less credible. As far as I know they're just speaking based on what they know, or giving a personal opinion. There's no prearranged PR effort here as far as I know. Is it conspiracy theory time once again? ;-)

> Flip the coin over, put the cast of characters that you clearly despise in the
same position. What do you think now?

It's pretty much impossible to simply slip those characters into this position because the contexts (both external circumstances and the self-created situations/dilemmas) are so different. *If* that "cast of characters" *didn't* have a history of deception and obfuscation, and released information like bbrv's post here, then I'd be inclined to take it at face value, too.

-- gary_c
Jump...
#52 DaveP
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 48greenboyRegistered user18-Nov-2003 07:03 GMT
Comment 49Anonymous18-Nov-2003 07:06 GMT
Comment 50Anonymous18-Nov-2003 07:12 GMT
Comment 51Anonymous18-Nov-2003 07:13 GMT
Comment 52DaveP18-Nov-2003 07:21 GMT
Comment 53SJ18-Nov-2003 07:24 GMT
Comment 54DaveP18-Nov-2003 07:26 GMT
Comment 55Ben Yoris18-Nov-2003 07:52 GMT
Comment 56SenexRegistered user18-Nov-2003 08:58 GMT
Comment 57samface18-Nov-2003 09:06 GMT
Comment 58Oppressor18-Nov-2003 09:27 GMT
Comment 59Anonymous18-Nov-2003 09:59 GMT
Comment 60Anonymous18-Nov-2003 10:01 GMT
Comment 61Alkis TsapanidisRegistered user18-Nov-2003 10:28 GMT
Comment 62Alkis TsapanidisRegistered user18-Nov-2003 10:32 GMT
Comment 63Bill Hoggett18-Nov-2003 10:35 GMT
Comment 64NekoRegistered user18-Nov-2003 10:36 GMT
Comment 65John18-Nov-2003 10:47 GMT
Comment 66Amon_ReRegistered user18-Nov-2003 10:48 GMT
Comment 67Amon_ReRegistered user18-Nov-2003 10:51 GMT
Comment 68Amon_ReRegistered user18-Nov-2003 10:54 GMT
Comment 69DaveP18-Nov-2003 10:55 GMT
Comment 70JoannaK18-Nov-2003 10:55 GMT
Comment 71Amon_ReRegistered user18-Nov-2003 10:55 GMT
Comment 72Amon_ReRegistered user18-Nov-2003 10:58 GMT
Comment 73Abuse18-Nov-2003 10:59 GMT
Comment 74DaveP18-Nov-2003 11:06 GMT
Comment 75AdmV18-Nov-2003 11:17 GMT
Comment 76Amon_ReRegistered user18-Nov-2003 11:19 GMT
Comment 77Bill Hoggett18-Nov-2003 11:43 GMT
Comment 78Alfie Moon18-Nov-2003 12:03 GMT
Comment 79Oppressor18-Nov-2003 12:07 GMT
Comment 80Christian KempRegistered user18-Nov-2003 12:19 GMT
Comment 81stumpy18-Nov-2003 12:27 GMT
Comment 82SenexRegistered user18-Nov-2003 12:58 GMT
Comment 83bbrvRegistered user18-Nov-2003 12:59 GMT
Comment 84Oppressor18-Nov-2003 13:52 GMT
Comment 85EmpathyLesson18-Nov-2003 13:57 GMT
Comment 86Matt Parsons18-Nov-2003 14:13 GMT
Comment 87samface18-Nov-2003 14:35 GMT
Comment 88Tigger18-Nov-2003 15:39 GMT
Comment 89Darrin18-Nov-2003 17:13 GMT
Comment 90T_Bone18-Nov-2003 18:28 GMT
Comment 91Amon_ReRegistered user18-Nov-2003 20:40 GMT
Comment 92Matt Parsons18-Nov-2003 20:55 GMT
Comment 93Anonymous18-Nov-2003 21:26 GMT
Comment 94T_Bone18-Nov-2003 22:12 GMT
Comment 95greenboyRegistered user18-Nov-2003 22:53 GMT
Comment 96greenboyRegistered user18-Nov-2003 23:33 GMT
Comment 97gary_c18-Nov-2003 23:54 GMT
Comment 98cheesegrate19-Nov-2003 02:11 GMT
Comment 99Anonymous19-Nov-2003 02:59 GMT
Comment 100Ronald19-Nov-2003 04:39 GMT
Comment 101DaveP19-Nov-2003 08:43 GMT
Comment 102DaveP19-Nov-2003 09:33 GMT
Comment 103Amon_ReRegistered user19-Nov-2003 10:34 GMT
Comment 104Anonymous19-Nov-2003 10:42 GMT
Comment 105JoannaK19-Nov-2003 11:15 GMT
Comment 106bbrvRegistered user19-Nov-2003 11:20 GMT
Comment 107DaveP19-Nov-2003 11:21 GMT
Comment 108redrumloa19-Nov-2003 11:25 GMT
Comment 109Oppressor19-Nov-2003 11:31 GMT
Comment 110Paul H19-Nov-2003 11:42 GMT
Comment 111Anonymous19-Nov-2003 11:44 GMT
Comment 112bbrvRegistered user19-Nov-2003 11:55 GMT
Comment 113Oppressor19-Nov-2003 12:06 GMT
Comment 114Christophe DecaniniRegistered user19-Nov-2003 12:22 GMT
Comment 115bbrvRegistered user19-Nov-2003 12:22 GMT
Comment 116bbrvRegistered user19-Nov-2003 12:35 GMT
Comment 117Damien Naviliat19-Nov-2003 12:56 GMT
Comment 118Damien Naviliat19-Nov-2003 13:01 GMT
Comment 119Nowee19-Nov-2003 13:05 GMT
Comment 120Damien Naviliat19-Nov-2003 13:07 GMT
Comment 121Christian KempRegistered user19-Nov-2003 13:22 GMT
Comment 122Damien Naviliat19-Nov-2003 13:33 GMT
Comment 123Lennart Fridén19-Nov-2003 14:22 GMT
Comment 124bbrvRegistered user19-Nov-2003 14:58 GMT
Comment 125Matt Parsons19-Nov-2003 15:18 GMT
Comment 126DaveP19-Nov-2003 15:20 GMT
Comment 127Matt Parsons19-Nov-2003 15:24 GMT
Comment 128bbrvRegistered user19-Nov-2003 15:25 GMT
Comment 129Matt Parsons19-Nov-2003 15:35 GMT
Comment 130Damien Naviliat19-Nov-2003 15:43 GMT
Comment 131greenboyRegistered user19-Nov-2003 15:55 GMT
Comment 132bbrvRegistered user19-Nov-2003 15:55 GMT
Comment 133Christophe DecaniniRegistered user19-Nov-2003 16:09 GMT
Comment 134bbrvRegistered user19-Nov-2003 16:26 GMT
Comment 135DaveP19-Nov-2003 16:36 GMT
Comment 136Christophe DecaniniRegistered user19-Nov-2003 16:38 GMT
Comment 137Abuse19-Nov-2003 16:56 GMT
Comment 138Ann19-Nov-2003 21:17 GMT
Comment 139Ann19-Nov-2003 21:28 GMT
Comment 140Amon_ReRegistered user19-Nov-2003 21:33 GMT
Comment 141Ann19-Nov-2003 21:38 GMT
Comment 142Amon_ReRegistered user19-Nov-2003 22:10 GMT
Comment 143Amon_ReRegistered user19-Nov-2003 22:14 GMT
Comment 144greenboyRegistered user19-Nov-2003 22:39 GMT
Comment 145Nicolas Sallin20-Nov-2003 00:39 GMT
Comment 146Anonymous20-Nov-2003 03:59 GMT
Comment 147CleanRoomMyAzz20-Nov-2003 04:03 GMT
Comment 148Nicolas Sallin20-Nov-2003 05:46 GMT
Comment 149DaveP20-Nov-2003 05:56 GMT
Comment 150Anonymous20-Nov-2003 06:03 GMT
Comment 151gary_c20-Nov-2003 06:15 GMT
Comment 152gary_c20-Nov-2003 06:21 GMT
Comment 153Anonymous20-Nov-2003 06:31 GMT
Comment 154Nicolas Sallin20-Nov-2003 07:16 GMT
Comment 155Anonymous20-Nov-2003 07:27 GMT
Comment 156DaveP20-Nov-2003 07:34 GMT
Comment 157BuriedHeads20-Nov-2003 14:40 GMT
Comment 158Stephane Desrosiers20-Nov-2003 14:42 GMT
Comment 159PunditsRock20-Nov-2003 14:43 GMT
Comment 160damien naviliat20-Nov-2003 15:07 GMT
Comment 161Matt Parsons20-Nov-2003 15:10 GMT
Back to Top