20-Apr-2024 10:46 GMT.
UNDER CONSTRUCTION
[News] REQUEST by Defendant Amiga Inc for a delay in any decisionsANN.lu
Posted on 20-Nov-2003 01:47 GMT by Rich Woods115 comments
View flat
View list
11/12/2003 REQUEST by Defendant Amiga Inc for a delay in any decisions. (RS, ) (Entered: 11/18/2003)

Bill McEwen requests delay in the Thendic-Amiga trial (by personal letter on Amiga stationary with the Ravensdale PO Box address) - pro se.

We are in the process of locating new council (sic) for Amiga as well as finishing up our investment round so that we will be able to move foward with proper representation.

While I fully expect Amiga will have the funding and council (sic) located before the requested extension......

Get the file Here

List of all comments to this article
Sorted by date, most recent at bottom
Comment 1Rich Woods20-Nov-2003 00:51 GMT
Comment 2stevey20-Nov-2003 01:54 GMT
Comment 3T_Bone20-Nov-2003 02:11 GMT
Comment 4Atheist220-Nov-2003 02:14 GMT
Comment 5Lando20-Nov-2003 02:20 GMT
Comment 6T_Bone20-Nov-2003 03:22 GMT
Comment 7hooligan/dcsRegistered user20-Nov-2003 03:24 GMT
Comment 8Atheist220-Nov-2003 04:28 GMT
Comment 9hooligan/dcsRegistered user20-Nov-2003 04:36 GMT
Comment 10T_Bone20-Nov-2003 05:06 GMT
Comment 11Ronald20-Nov-2003 05:23 GMT
Comment 12DaveP20-Nov-2003 05:43 GMT
Comment 13Tigger20-Nov-2003 07:19 GMT
Comment 14Anonymous20-Nov-2003 07:21 GMT
Comment 15samface20-Nov-2003 07:28 GMT
Comment 16DaveP20-Nov-2003 07:31 GMT
Comment 17Atheist220-Nov-2003 07:36 GMT
Comment 18Jupp320-Nov-2003 08:05 GMT
Comment 19samface20-Nov-2003 08:24 GMT
REQUEST by Defendant Amiga Inc for a delay in any decisions : Comment 20 of 115ANN.lu
Posted by Daniel Miller on 20-Nov-2003 09:02 GMT
I can't imagine the judge will grant this. It's kindergarten what is going on. Amiga Inc. want 60 days to get ready. Where were they for the *last* 60 days? If the law is that corporations must have legal counsel, it seems to me that the prospect of the judge delaying this because McEwen sent a fax with some promises ('finalizing our latest round of funding') is pretty unlikely.

Today was the deadline wasn't it? The summary judgement is limited to the Amiga Inc. counterclaim IIRC. We'll see how that goes, but after that Amiga Inc. will probably hang on for some more months. They can do that because it doesn't cost much to send a fax now and then. It's bad for the community because people don't get resolution and don't get to move on to the next thing, but Amiga Inc. just uses the community to cash in with periodic T-shirt and coupon scams. I wouldn't be surprised to see another such scam in the near future.

I see where Samface implies in this thread that Rich Woods posted documents that were not authentic, but that is just trolling until Samface gives some proof. I am very much against the surveillance type stuff Rich has done, but he has done a real service to the community by getting hold of the legal documents and making them available, like this one. Bill McEwen and his latest round of funding, yeah right, keep stringing us and the judge along Bill, you can BS your way out of anything right? ;)
Jump...
#27 Rich Woods #43 gabrielh
TopPrevious commentNext commentbottom
List of all comments to this article (continued)
Comment 21Rassilon AKA Lewis Brunton20-Nov-2003 09:05 GMT
Comment 22IanSRegistered user20-Nov-2003 09:09 GMT
Comment 23Daniel Miller20-Nov-2003 09:13 GMT
Comment 24IanSRegistered user20-Nov-2003 09:16 GMT
Comment 25Daniel Miller20-Nov-2003 09:18 GMT
Comment 26Daniel Miller20-Nov-2003 09:26 GMT
Comment 27Rich Woods20-Nov-2003 09:30 GMT
Comment 28Anonymous20-Nov-2003 09:33 GMT
Comment 29Anonymous20-Nov-2003 09:51 GMT
Comment 30Don CoxRegistered user20-Nov-2003 09:58 GMT
Comment 31Rich Woods20-Nov-2003 09:58 GMT
Comment 32Matt Parsons20-Nov-2003 10:13 GMT
Comment 33ikir_spirit20-Nov-2003 10:15 GMT
Comment 34DaveP20-Nov-2003 10:15 GMT
Comment 35Rich Woods20-Nov-2003 10:15 GMT
Comment 36AdmV20-Nov-2003 10:26 GMT
Comment 37Atheist220-Nov-2003 10:41 GMT
Comment 38Alkis TsapanidisRegistered user20-Nov-2003 11:28 GMT
Comment 39Alkis TsapanidisRegistered user20-Nov-2003 11:31 GMT
Comment 40tonya20-Nov-2003 12:16 GMT
Comment 41me20-Nov-2003 13:39 GMT
Comment 42gabrielh20-Nov-2003 13:48 GMT
Comment 43gabrielh20-Nov-2003 13:51 GMT
Comment 44Ronald20-Nov-2003 13:52 GMT
Comment 45gabrielh20-Nov-2003 13:55 GMT
Comment 46ghauberRegistered user20-Nov-2003 14:02 GMT
Comment 47Anonymous20-Nov-2003 14:23 GMT
Comment 48redrumloa20-Nov-2003 15:03 GMT
Comment 49Matt Parsons20-Nov-2003 15:05 GMT
Comment 50Matt Parsons20-Nov-2003 15:16 GMT
Comment 51T_Bone20-Nov-2003 15:50 GMT
Comment 52Don CoxRegistered user20-Nov-2003 15:55 GMT
Comment 53Matt Parsons20-Nov-2003 15:56 GMT
Comment 54Don CoxRegistered user20-Nov-2003 16:29 GMT
Comment 55Tigger20-Nov-2003 16:40 GMT
Comment 56Rich Woods20-Nov-2003 17:39 GMT
Comment 57Rich Woods20-Nov-2003 17:48 GMT
Comment 58Rich Woods20-Nov-2003 17:51 GMT
Comment 59John20-Nov-2003 18:07 GMT
Comment 60samface20-Nov-2003 19:03 GMT
Comment 61Nate DownesRegistered user20-Nov-2003 19:06 GMT
Comment 62samface20-Nov-2003 19:15 GMT
Comment 63smithy20-Nov-2003 19:39 GMT
Comment 64anonymous20-Nov-2003 19:51 GMT
Comment 65Anonymous20-Nov-2003 20:02 GMT
Comment 66Anonymous20-Nov-2003 21:03 GMT
Comment 67John20-Nov-2003 21:21 GMT
Comment 68samface20-Nov-2003 21:46 GMT
Comment 69samface20-Nov-2003 22:03 GMT
Comment 70samface20-Nov-2003 22:06 GMT
Comment 71Atheist220-Nov-2003 22:18 GMT
Comment 72ghauberRegistered user20-Nov-2003 23:00 GMT
Comment 73ghauberRegistered user20-Nov-2003 23:06 GMT
Comment 74Nate DownesRegistered user20-Nov-2003 23:23 GMT
Comment 75Van M.20-Nov-2003 23:43 GMT
Comment 76Rich Woods21-Nov-2003 01:23 GMT
Comment 77Rich Woods21-Nov-2003 01:31 GMT
Comment 78Rich Woods21-Nov-2003 01:36 GMT
Comment 79MarkTime21-Nov-2003 02:20 GMT
Comment 80Anonymous21-Nov-2003 04:43 GMT
Comment 81ghauberRegistered user21-Nov-2003 05:01 GMT
Comment 82Don CoxRegistered user21-Nov-2003 06:56 GMT
Comment 83Fabio Alemagna21-Nov-2003 08:02 GMT
Comment 84Fabio Alemagna21-Nov-2003 08:03 GMT
Comment 85Harry21-Nov-2003 10:49 GMT
Comment 86Rich Woods21-Nov-2003 10:55 GMT
Comment 87Rich Woods21-Nov-2003 10:59 GMT
Comment 88samface21-Nov-2003 11:16 GMT
Comment 89Matt Parsons21-Nov-2003 11:23 GMT
Comment 90samface21-Nov-2003 11:40 GMT
Comment 91Matt Parsons21-Nov-2003 12:05 GMT
Comment 92samface21-Nov-2003 12:18 GMT
Comment 93Matt Parsons21-Nov-2003 12:52 GMT
Comment 94samface21-Nov-2003 13:10 GMT
Comment 95Anonymous21-Nov-2003 13:26 GMT
Comment 96Matt Parsons21-Nov-2003 13:53 GMT
Comment 97Nate DownesRegistered user21-Nov-2003 14:20 GMT
Comment 98Jerry21-Nov-2003 14:26 GMT
Comment 99T_Bone21-Nov-2003 14:44 GMT
Comment 100Eva21-Nov-2003 15:22 GMT
Comment 101Vexar21-Nov-2003 17:49 GMT
Comment 102Nate DownesRegistered user21-Nov-2003 18:31 GMT
Comment 103MarkTime21-Nov-2003 18:36 GMT
Comment 104Matt Parsons21-Nov-2003 18:41 GMT
Comment 105acg21-Nov-2003 19:07 GMT
Comment 106T_Bone21-Nov-2003 22:58 GMT
Comment 107T_Bone21-Nov-2003 23:00 GMT
Comment 108acg21-Nov-2003 23:51 GMT
Comment 109T_Bone22-Nov-2003 00:19 GMT
Comment 110bbrvRegistered user22-Nov-2003 10:49 GMT
Comment 111samface22-Nov-2003 13:36 GMT
Comment 112samface22-Nov-2003 14:21 GMT
Comment 113Rich Woods22-Nov-2003 22:36 GMT
Comment 114hooligan/dcsRegistered user25-Nov-2003 06:17 GMT
Comment 115TheArrogantSarny29-Nov-2003 20:48 GMT
Back to Top